Drucken
Artikel, Notizen und Markierungen werden geladen... Bitte um etwas Geduld.

Swiss Criminal Procedure Code
(Criminal Procedure Code, CrimPC)

English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is provided for information purposes only and has no legal force.

of 5 October 2007 (Status as of 1 July 2021)

The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation,

on the basis of Article 123 paragraph 1 of the Federal Constitution1,
and having considered the Federal Council Dispatch dated 21 December 20052,

decrees:

Title 1 Scope of Application and Principles

Chapter 1 Scope of Application and the Administration of Criminal Justice

Art. 1 Scope of application

1 This Code reg­u­lates the pro­sec­u­tion and ad­ju­dic­a­tion by the fed­er­al and can­ton­al crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies of of­fences un­der fed­er­al law.

2 The pro­ced­ur­al reg­u­la­tions con­tained in oth­er fed­er­al acts are re­served.

Art. 2 Administration of criminal justice

1 The ad­min­is­tra­tion of crim­in­al justice is the re­spons­ib­il­ity solely of the au­thor­it­ies spe­cified by law.

2 Crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings may be con­duc­ted and con­cluded only in the forms provided for by law.

Chapter 2 Principles of Criminal Procedure Law

Art. 3 Respect for human dignity and requirement of fairness

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall re­spect the dig­nity of the per­sons af­fected by the pro­ceed­ings at all stages of the pro­ceed­ings.

2 They shall in par­tic­u­lar com­ply with:

a.
the prin­ciple of good faith;
b.
the re­quire­ment not to ab­use the rights of oth­ers;
c.
the re­quire­ment to treat all per­sons in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings equally and fairly and to grant them the right to be heard;
d.
the pro­hib­i­tion, when tak­ing evid­ence, of us­ing meth­ods that vi­ol­ate hu­man dig­nity.

Art. 4 Independence

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies are in­de­pend­ent in ap­ply­ing the law and bound solely by the law.

2 Stat­utory powers to is­sue dir­ect­ives to the pro­sec­u­tion au­thor­it­ies un­der Art­icle 14 are re­served.

Art. 5 Principle of expeditiousness

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall com­mence crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings im­me­di­ately and con­clude them without un­jus­ti­fied delay.

2 Where an ac­cused is in de­ten­tion, the pro­ceed­ings shall be con­duc­ted as a mat­ter of ur­gency.

Art. 6 Principle of substantive truth

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall in­vest­ig­ate ex of­fi­cio all the cir­cum­stances rel­ev­ant to the as­sess­ment of the crim­in­al act and the ac­cused.

2 They shall in­vest­ig­ate in­crim­in­at­ing and ex­culp­at­ing cir­cum­stances with equal care.

Art. 7 Obligation to prosecute

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies are ob­liged to com­mence and con­duct pro­ceed­ings that fall with­in their jur­is­dic­tion where they are aware of or have grounds for sus­pect­ing that an of­fence has been com­mit­ted.

2 The can­tons may provide:

a.
for the ex­clu­sion or lim­it­a­tion of crim­in­al li­ab­il­ity for state­ments made in the can­ton­al par­lia­ment by the mem­bers of their le­gis­lat­ive and ju­di­cial au­thor­it­ies and of their gov­ern­ments;
b.
that the pro­sec­u­tion of mem­bers of their au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for the ex­e­cu­tion of sen­tences and meas­ures and ju­di­cial au­thor­it­ies for felon­ies or mis­de­mean­ours com­mit­ted while in of­fice be made sub­ject to the au­thor­isa­tion of a non-ju­di­cial au­thor­ity.

Art. 8 Waiving prosecution

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor and courts shall waive pro­sec­u­tion if the fed­er­al law so per­mits, in par­tic­u­lar sub­ject to the re­quire­ments of Art­icles 52, 53 and 54 of the Swiss Crim­in­al Code3 (SCC).

2 Un­less it is con­trary to the private claimant's over­rid­ing in­terests, they shall also waive pro­sec­u­tion if:

a.
the of­fence is of neg­li­gible im­port­ance in com­par­is­on with the oth­er of­fences with which the ac­cused is charged as re­gards the ex­pec­ted sen­tence or meas­ure;
b.
any ad­di­tion­al pen­alty im­posed in com­bin­a­tion with the sen­tence in the fi­nal judg­ment would be neg­li­gible;
c.
an equi­val­ent sen­tence im­posed abroad would have to be taken in­to ac­count when im­pos­ing a sen­tence for the of­fence pro­sec­uted.

3 Un­less it is con­trary to the private claimant's over­rid­ing in­terests, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and courts may waive the pro­sec­u­tion if the of­fence is already be­ing pro­sec­uted by a for­eign au­thor­ity or the pro­sec­u­tion has been as­signed to such an au­thor­ity.

4 In such cases, they shall is­sue an or­der stat­ing that no pro­ceed­ings are be­ing tak­ing or that the on­go­ing pro­ceed­ings have been aban­doned.

Art. 9 Principle of no judgment without a charge

1 An of­fence may only be ju­di­cially as­sessed if the pub­lic pro­sec­utor has brought a re­lated charge against a spe­cif­ic per­son in the com­pet­ent court based on pre­cisely de­scribed cir­cum­stances.

2 The fore­go­ing para­graph does not ap­ply to pro­ceed­ings re­lat­ing to sum­mary pen­alty or­ders and con­tra­ven­tions.

Art. 10 Presumption of innocence and assessment of evidence

1 Every per­son is pre­sumed to be in­no­cent un­til they have been con­victed in a judg­ment that is fi­nal and leg­ally bind­ing.

2 The court shall be free to in­ter­pret the evid­ence in ac­cord­ance with the views that it forms over the en­tire pro­ceed­ings.

3 Where there is in­sur­mount­able doubt as to wheth­er the fac­tu­al re­quire­ments of al­leged of­fence have been ful­filled, the court shall pro­ceed on the as­sump­tion that the cir­cum­stances more fa­vour­able to the ac­cused oc­curred.

Art. 11 Prohibition of double jeopardy

1 No per­son who has been con­victed or ac­quit­ted in Switzer­land by a fi­nal leg­ally bind­ing judg­ment may be pro­sec­uted again for the same of­fence.

2 The fore­go­ing para­graph does not ap­ply to pro­ceed­ings that have been waived or aban­doned and to the re­view of a case.

Title 2 Criminal Justice Authorities

Chapter 1 Powers

Section 1 General Provisions

Art. 12 Prosecution authorities

The pro­sec­u­tion au­thor­it­ies are:

a.
the po­lice;
b.
the pub­lic pro­sec­utor;
c.
the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions.

Art. 13 Courts

The fol­low­ing bod­ies have ju­di­cial powers in crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings:

a.
the com­puls­ory meas­ures court;
b.
the court of first in­stance;
c.
the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity;
d.
the court of ap­peal.

Art. 14 Titles and organisation of the criminal justice authorities

1 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall de­term­ine their own crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies and the titles that they use.

2 They shall reg­u­late the com­pos­i­tion, or­gan­isa­tion and powers of the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies and the ap­point­ment of their mem­bers, un­less this Code or oth­er fed­er­al acts reg­u­late the same in full.

3 They may es­tab­lish the of­fices of a chief pub­lic pro­sec­utor or at­tor­ney gen­er­al.

4 They may es­tab­lish two or more sim­il­ar crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies and spe­cify the loc­al or ma­ter­i­al jur­is­dic­tion of each; ex­emp­ted there­from are the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity and the court of ap­peal.

5 They shall reg­u­late the su­per­vi­sion of their crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies.

Section 2 Prosecution Authorities

Art. 15 Police

1 The activ­it­ies of the fed­er­al, can­ton­al and com­mun­al po­lice in pro­sec­u­tion mat­ters are gov­erned by this Code.

2 The po­lice in­vest­ig­ate of­fences on their own ini­ti­at­ive, in re­sponse to re­ports from mem­bers of the pub­lic and from au­thor­it­ies, and on the in­struc­tions of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor; in do­ing so, they are sub­ject to the su­per­vi­sion and the dir­ect­ives of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

3 Where crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings are pending be­fore a court, the court may is­sue the po­lice with in­struc­tions and as­sign­ments.

Art. 16 Public prosecutor

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor is re­spons­ible for the uni­form ex­er­cise of the state's right to pun­ish crim­in­al con­duct.

2 It con­ducts pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings, pur­sues of­fences with­in the scope of the in­vest­ig­a­tion, and where ap­plic­able brings charges and acts as pro­sec­utor.

Art. 17 Authorities responsible for prosecuting contraventions

1 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may del­eg­ate the pro­sec­u­tion and ad­ju­dic­a­tion of con­tra­ven­tions to ad­min­is­trat­ive au­thor­it­ies.

2 Where con­tra­ven­tions are com­mit­ted in con­nec­tion with a felony or mis­de­mean­our, they shall be pro­sec­uted by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and judged by the courts at the same time as the more ser­i­ous of­fence.

Section 3 Courts

Art. 18 Compulsory measures court

1 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court is re­spons­ible for or­der­ing the ac­cused's re­mand or pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion and, where this Code so provides, for or­der­ing or ap­prov­ing ad­di­tion­al com­puls­ory meas­ures.

2 Mem­bers of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court may not sit as judge in the main hear­ing in the same case.

Art. 19 Court of first instance

1 The court of first in­stance as­sesses, as the first in­stance, all of­fences that do not fall with­in the jur­is­dic­tion of oth­er au­thor­it­ies.

2 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may provide that the court of first in­stance com­prise one judge sit­ting alone to as­sess:

a.
con­tra­ven­tions;
b.
felon­ies and mis­de­mean­ours, with ex­cep­tion of those for which the pub­lic pro­sec­utor de­mands a cus­todi­al sen­tence of more than two years, in­def­in­ite in­car­cer­a­tion in terms of Art­icle 64 SCC4, treat­ment in terms of Art­icle 59 para­graph 3 SCC or, in the case of sus­pen­ded sanc­tions to be re­voked sim­ul­tan­eously, a depriva­tion of liberty of more than two years.

Art. 20 Objections authority

1 The ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity rules on ob­jec­tions against the pro­ced­ur­al acts and de­cisions not sub­ject to form­al ap­peal:

a.
of the courts of first in­stance;
b.
of the po­lice, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions;
c.
of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court in the cases provided for by this Code.

2 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may as­sign the powers of the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity to the court of ap­peal.

Art. 21 Court of appeal

1 The court of ap­peal de­cides on:

a.
ap­peals against judg­ments of the courts of first in­stance;
b.
ap­plic­a­tions for the re­view of a case.

2 Any per­son who has ac­ted as a mem­ber of the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity may not sit as a mem­ber of the court of ap­peal in the same case.

3 Any per­son who has ac­ted as a mem­ber of the court of ap­peal in a spe­cif­ic case may not act as a judge re­view­ing the same case.

Chapter 2 Material Jurisdiction

Section 1 Extent of Federal and Cantonal Jurisdiction

Art. 22 Cantonal jurisdiction

The can­ton­al crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall pro­sec­ute and judge of­fences un­der fed­er­al law, sub­ject to the stat­utory ex­cep­tions.

Art. 23 Federal jurisdiction in general

1 The fol­low­ing of­fences in the SCC5 are sub­ject to fed­er­al jur­is­dic­tion:

a.6
the of­fences in Titles One and Four and Art­icles 140, 156, 189 and 190 in­so­far as they are com­mit­ted against per­sons pro­tec­ted by in­ter­na­tion­al law, mem­bers of the Fed­er­al Coun­cil, the Fed­er­al Chan­cel­lor or judges of the Fed­er­al Courts, mem­bers the Fed­er­al As­sembly, the Fed­er­al At­tor­ney Gen­er­al or the Deputy At­tor­neys Gen­er­al;
b.
the of­fences in Art­icles 137–141, 144, 160 and 172terin­so­far as they re­late to premises, archives or doc­u­ments of dip­lo­mat­ic mis­sions and con­su­lates;
c.
the tak­ing of host­ages in terms of Art­icle 185 in or­der to ex­ert duress on fed­er­al or for­eign au­thor­it­ies;
d.
felon­ies and mis­de­mean­ours un­der Art­icle 224–226ter;
e.7
the felon­ies and mis­de­mean­ours in Title Ten re­lat­ing to coin­age, pa­per money and bank­notes, of­fi­cial stamps and oth­er fed­er­al marks, weights and meas­ures;
f.
the felon­ies and mis­de­mean­ours in Title El­ev­en in­so­far as they re­late to of­fi­cial fed­er­al doc­u­ments, with the ex­cep­tion of driv­ing li­cences and re­ceipts for postal money trans­fers; not in­cluded are vign­ettes for us­ing first and second class na­tion­al high­ways;
g.8
the of­fences in Title Twelvebis and Twelveter as well as Art­icle 264k;
h.
the of­fences in Art­icle 260bis and in Titles Thir­teen to Fif­teen and in Title Sev­en­teen, provided they are dir­ec­ted against the Con­fed­er­a­tion, the au­thor­it­ies of the Con­fed­er­a­tion, the will of the People in fed­er­al elec­tions, pop­u­lar votes, re­quests for a ref­er­en­dum or ini­ti­at­ives, against fed­er­al powers or against the ad­min­is­tra­tion of fed­er­al justice;
i.
the felon­ies and mis­de­mean­ours in Title Six­teen;
j.
the of­fences in Titles Eight­een and Nine­teen in­so­far as they are com­mit­ted by a mem­ber of an au­thor­ity or an em­ploy­ee of the Con­fed­er­a­tion or against the Con­fed­er­a­tion;
k.
the con­tra­ven­tions in Art­icles 329–331;
l.
polit­ic­al felon­ies and mis­de­mean­ours that are the cause or con­sequence of un­rest that gives rise to armed fed­er­al in­ter­ven­tion.

2 The reg­u­la­tions con­tained in spe­cial fed­er­al acts on the jur­is­dic­tion of the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Court are re­served.

5 SR 311.0

6 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125).

7 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the Fixed Pen­al­ties Act of 18 March 2016, in force since 1 Jan. 2018 (AS 2017 6559; BBl 2015 959).

8 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 18 June 2010 on the Amend­ment of Fed­er­al Le­gis­la­tion in Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Rome Stat­ute of the In­ter­na­tion­al Crim­in­al Court, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 4963; BBl 2008 3863).

Art. 24 Federal jurisdiction in the case of organised crime, terrorist offences and white-collar crime 9

1 Fed­er­al jur­is­dic­tion fur­ther ap­plies to the of­fences in Art­icles 260ter, 260quin­quies, 260sex­ies, 305bis, 305ter and 322ter–322sep­ties SCC10 as well as the felon­ies as­so­ci­ated with a crim­in­al or ter­ror­ist or­gan­isa­tion as defined in Art­icle 260ter SCC, if the of­fences:11

a.
have to sub­stan­tial ex­tent been com­mit­ted abroad;
b.
have been com­mit­ted in two or more can­tons with no single can­ton be­ing the clear fo­cus of the crim­in­al activ­ity.

2 In the case of felon­ies un­der Titles Two and El­ev­en of the SCC, the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al of Switzer­land may open an in­vest­ig­a­tion if:

a.
the re­quire­ments of para­graph 1 are ful­filled; and
b.
no can­ton­al crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity is deal­ing with the case or if the com­pet­ent can­ton­al crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity re­quests the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al of Switzer­land to take over the case.

3 The open­ing of an in­vest­ig­a­tion in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 2 es­tab­lishes fed­er­al jur­is­dic­tion.

9 Amended by An­nex No II 3 of the FedD of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ap­prov­al and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Coun­cil of Europe Con­ven­tion on the Pre­ven­tion of Ter­ror­ism and its Ad­di­tion­al Pro­tocol and the Strength­en­ing of Crim­in­al Justice In­stru­ments for com­bat­ing Ter­ror­ism and Or­gan­ised Crime, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2021 (AS 2021 360; BBl 2018 6427).

10 SR 311.0

11 Amended by An­nex No II 3 of the FedD of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ap­prov­al and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Coun­cil of Europe Con­ven­tion on the Pre­ven­tion of Ter­ror­ism and its Ad­di­tion­al Pro­tocol and the Strength­en­ing of Crim­in­al Justice In­stru­ments for com­bat­ing Ter­ror­ism and Or­gan­ised Crime, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2021 (AS 2021 360; BBl 2018 6427).

Art. 25 Delegation to the cantons

1 The Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al of Switzer­land may as­sign a crim­in­al case sub­ject to fed­er­al jur­is­dic­tion in terms of Art­icle 23 to the can­ton­al au­thor­it­ies for in­vest­ig­a­tion and ad­ju­dic­a­tion or, by way of ex­cep­tion, for as­sess­ment only. Ex­emp­ted there­from are crim­in­al cases in terms of Art­icle 23 para­graph 1 let­ter g.

2 In minor cases, it may also as­sign a crim­in­al case sub­ject to fed­er­al jur­is­dic­tion in terms of Art­icle 24 to the can­ton­al au­thor­it­ies for in­vest­ig­a­tion and ad­ju­dic­a­tion.

Art. 26 Multiple jurisdiction

1 If the of­fence was com­mit­ted in two or more can­tons or abroad or if of­fend­ers, co-of­fend­ers, or par­ti­cipants are dom­i­ciled or ha­bitu­ally res­id­ent in dif­fer­ent can­tons, the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al of Switzer­land shall de­cide which can­ton in­vest­ig­ates and ad­ju­dic­ates the case.

2 If a crim­in­al case is sub­ject to both fed­er­al and can­ton­al jur­is­dic­tion, the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al of Switzer­land may in­struct the pro­ceed­ings to be com­bined and dealt with by the fed­er­al au­thor­it­ies or the can­ton­al au­thor­it­ies.

3 Jur­is­dic­tion es­tab­lished in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 2 con­tin­ues to ap­ply even if that part of the pro­ceed­ings that es­tab­lished jur­is­dic­tion has been aban­doned.

4 Where del­eg­a­tion in ac­cord­ance with this Chapter is an op­tion, the pub­lic pro­sec­utors of the Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall provide each oth­er with their re­spect­ive files. Once the de­cision is made, the files shall be passed to the au­thor­ity that must in­vest­ig­ate and ad­ju­dic­ate the case.

Art. 27 Jurisdiction over the initial enquiries

1 Where a case is sub­ject to fed­er­al jur­is­dic­tion, the mat­ter is ur­gent and the fed­er­al crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies are not yet in­volved, the po­lice en­quir­ies and the in­vest­ig­a­tion may also be con­duc­ted by the can­ton­al au­thor­it­ies that have loc­al jur­is­dic­tion un­der the rules on place of jur­is­dic­tion. The Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al of Switzer­land must be no­ti­fied im­me­di­ately; the case must be trans­ferred to the OAG or re­ferred for a de­cision in terms of Art­icles 25 or 26 as soon as pos­sible.

2 In the case of of­fences that have been com­mit­ted wholly or partly in two or more can­tons or abroad and for which fed­er­al or can­ton­al jur­is­dic­tion has not yet been es­tab­lished, the fed­er­al crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies may con­duct the ini­tial en­quir­ies.

Art. 28 Conflicts

In the event of con­flicts between the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al of Switzer­land and can­ton­al crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies, the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Court shall de­cide.

Section 2 Jurisdiction where two or more Offences coincide

Art. 29 Principle of unity of proceedings

1 Of­fences shall be pro­sec­uted and ad­ju­dic­ated to­geth­er where:

a.
one per­son is ac­cused of two or more of­fences; or
b.
the case in­volves co-of­fend­ing or par­ti­cip­a­tion.

2 Where one or more of mul­tiple of­fences are sub­ject to fed­er­al jur­is­dic­tion or mul­tiple of­fences have been com­mit­ted in dif­fer­ent can­tons and by two or more per­sons, Art­icles 25 and 33–38 take pre­ced­ence.

Art. 30 Exceptions

The pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the courts may sep­ar­ate or com­bine crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings for prac­tic­al reas­ons.

Chapter 3 Place of Jurisdiction

Section 1 Principles

Art. 31 Place of jurisdiction of the place of commission

1 The au­thor­it­ies of the locus of crim­in­al act was com­mit­ted have jur­is­dic­tion to pro­sec­ute and ad­ju­dic­ate the of­fence. If it is only the out­come of the of­fence that oc­curs in Switzer­land, the au­thor­it­ies at the place where it oc­curs have jur­is­dic­tion.

2 Where the of­fence is com­mit­ted in two or more places or if the out­come oc­curs in two or more places, the au­thor­it­ies in the place where the ini­tial pro­sec­u­tion pro­ced­ures are car­ried out have jur­is­dic­tion.

3 Where an ac­cused has com­mit­ted two or more felon­ies, mis­de­mean­ours or con­tra­ven­tions in the same locus, the vari­ous pro­ceed­ings shall be com­bined.

Art. 32 Place of jurisdiction for offences committed abroad or at an unknown location

1 Where an of­fence was com­mit­ted abroad or if the place of com­mis­sion can­not be es­tab­lished, the au­thor­it­ies of the place where the ac­cused is dom­i­ciled or ha­bitu­ally res­id­ent has jur­is­dic­tion to pro­sec­ute and ad­ju­dic­ate the of­fence.

2 If the ac­cused is neither dom­i­ciled nor ha­bitu­ally res­id­ent in Switzer­land, the au­thor­it­ies at his or her place of ori­gin have jur­is­dic­tion; in the ab­sence of a place of ori­gin, the au­thor­it­ies of the place where the ac­cused was found have jur­is­dic­tion.

3 In the ab­sence of a place of jur­is­dic­tion in ac­cord­ance with para­graphs 1 and 2, au­thor­it­ies of the Can­ton re­quest­ing ex­tra­di­tion have jur­is­dic­tion.

Section 2 Special Jurisdiction

Art. 33 Place of jurisdiction in the case of two or more participants

1 The par­ti­cipants in an of­fence shall be pro­sec­uted and ad­ju­dic­ated by the same au­thor­it­ies as the prin­cip­al of­fend­er.

2 If an of­fence has been com­mit­ted by two or more co-of­fend­ers, the au­thor­it­ies of the place where the ini­tial pro­sec­u­tion pro­ced­ures were car­ried out have jur­is­dic­tion.

Art. 34 Place of jurisdiction where two or more offences are committed at different loci

1 Where an ac­cused has com­mit­ted two or more of­fences at dif­fer­ent loci, the au­thor­it­ies of the place where the of­fence that car­ries the most severe pen­alty was com­mit­ted have jur­is­dic­tion to pro­sec­ute and ad­ju­dic­ate all of­fences. Where two or more of­fences carry the same pen­alty, the au­thor­it­ies of the place where the ini­tial pro­sec­u­tion pro­ced­ures were car­ried out have jur­is­dic­tion.

2 Where charges have already been brought in a par­ti­cipant can­ton in re­spect of one of the of­fences at the time of the pro­ced­ure to es­tab­lish jur­is­dic­tion in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 39–42, the pro­ceed­ings shall be con­duc­ted sep­ar­ately.

3 Where a per­son is sen­tenced by dif­fer­ent courts to two or more sim­il­ar pen­al­ties, the court that has im­posed the most severe pen­alty shall on ap­plic­a­tion im­pose a cu­mu­lat­ive sen­tence on the con­victed per­son.

Art. 35 Place of jurisdiction for offences via the media

1 In the case of an of­fence un­der Art­icle 28 SCC12 com­mit­ted in Switzer­land, the au­thor­it­ies of the place where the me­dia un­der­tak­ing has its re­gistered of­fice have jur­is­dic­tion.

2 If the au­thor is known and if he or she is dom­i­ciled or ha­bitu­ally res­id­ent in Switzer­land, the au­thor­it­ies at the dom­i­cile or the place of ha­bitu­al res­id­ence have jur­is­dic­tion. In such a case, the pro­ceed­ings shall be con­duc­ted where the ini­tial pro­sec­u­tion pro­ced­ures were car­ried out. In the case of of­fences pro­sec­uted only on com­plaint, the com­plain­ant may choose between the two places of jur­is­dic­tion.

3 Where no place of jur­is­dic­tion is es­tab­lished by para­graphs 1 or 2, the au­thor­it­ies of the place where the me­dia product is broad­cast have jur­is­dic­tion. If broad­cast­ing takes place in two or more places, the au­thor­it­ies of the place where the ini­tial pro­sec­u­tion pro­ced­ures were car­ried out have jur­is­dic­tion.

Art. 36 Place of jurisdiction in the case of Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy offences and criminal proceedings against corporate undertakings

1 In the case of of­fences in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 163–171bis SCC13, the au­thor­it­ies at the dom­i­cile, place of ha­bitu­al res­id­ence or re­gistered of­fice of the debt­or have jur­is­dic­tion re­spons­ible.

2 For crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings against a cor­por­ate un­der­tak­ing in terms of Art­icle 102 SCC, the au­thor­it­ies at the re­gistered of­fice of the un­der­tak­ing have jur­is­dic­tion. The fore­go­ing also ap­plies if a per­son act­ing for the un­der­tak­ing is also be­ing pro­sec­uted for the same of­fence.

3 In the ab­sence of a place of jur­is­dic­tion in ac­cord­ance with para­graphs 1 and 2, jur­is­dic­tion is es­tab­lished in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 31–35.

Art. 37 Place of jurisdiction for separate forfeiture proceedings

1 Sep­ar­ate for­feit­ure pro­ceed­ings (Art. 376–378) must be car­ried out in the place where the items or as­sets to be for­feited are loc­ated.

2 If the items or as­sets to be for­feited are loc­ated in two or more can­tons and if they are con­nec­ted to the same of­fence or of­fend­er, the au­thor­it­ies of the place where the for­feit­ure pro­ceed­ings were ini­ti­ated has jur­is­dic­tion.

Art. 38 Establishing an alternative place of jurisdiction

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utors may by mu­tu­al agree­ment es­tab­lish a place of jur­is­dic­tion oth­er than that provided for in Art­icles 31–37 if this is jus­ti­fied by the fo­cus of the crim­in­al activ­ity, the per­son­al cir­cum­stances of the ac­cused or oth­er just cause.

2 In or­der to safe­guard the pro­ced­ur­al rights of a party, after charges have been filed, the can­ton­al ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity may on ap­plic­a­tion from that party or ex of­fi­cio trans­fer the ad­ju­dic­a­tion to an­oth­er court of first in­stance in the same can­ton with ma­ter­i­al jur­is­dic­tion in derog­a­tion from the rules on place of jur­is­dic­tion in this Chapter.

Section 3 Procedure for Establishing Jurisdiction

Art. 39 Verification of and agreement on jurisdiction

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall veri­fy their jur­is­dic­tion ex of­fi­cio and if ne­ces­sary trans­fer the case to the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity.

2 Where two or more crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies have loc­al jur­is­dic­tion, the pub­lic pro­sec­utors con­cerned shall no­ti­fy each oth­er im­me­di­ately of the es­sen­tial ele­ments of the case and en­deav­our to reach agree­ment as soon as pos­sible.

Art. 40 Conflicts of jurisdiction

1 In the event of a dis­pute over jur­is­dic­tion between crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies in the same can­ton, the Of­fice of the Chief Can­ton­al Pro­sec­utor or Can­ton­al At­tor­ney Gen­er­al shall make the fi­nal de­cision or, if there is no such of­fice, the can­ton­al ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity.

2 In the event of a dis­pute over jur­is­dic­tion between crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies in dif­fer­ent can­tons, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor of the can­ton that was first to deal with the mat­ter shall sub­mit the is­sue im­me­di­ately, and in every case be­fore bring­ing charges, to the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Court for de­cision.

3 The au­thor­ity com­pet­ent to de­cide on the place of jur­is­dic­tion may spe­cify a place of jur­is­dic­tion oth­er than that provided for in Art­icles 31–37 if this is re­quired due to the fo­cus of the crim­in­al activ­ity or the per­son­al cir­cum­stances of the ac­cused or if there is oth­er just cause.

Art. 41 Contesting the place of jurisdiction

1 If a party wishes to con­test the jur­is­dic­tion of the au­thor­ity con­duct­ing the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings, he or she must im­me­di­ately re­quest the au­thor­ity to trans­fer the case to the com­pet­ent crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity.

2 The parties may file an ob­jec­tion with­in 10 days with the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for the de­cision on the place of jur­is­dic­tion in terms of Art­icle 40 against the de­cision on the place of jur­is­dic­tion (Art. 39 para. 2) made by the pub­lic pro­sec­utors con­cerned. If the pub­lic pro­sec­utors have agreed on an al­tern­at­ive place of jur­is­dic­tion (Art. 38 para. 1), only the party whose re­quest un­der para­graph 1 is re­jec­ted has the right to file an ob­jec­tion.

Art. 42 Common provisions

1 Un­til a bind­ing de­cision is made on the place of jur­is­dic­tion, the first au­thor­ity to deal with the case shall carry out any meas­ures that can­not be delayed. If ne­ces­sary the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for the de­cision on the place of jur­is­dic­tion shall des­ig­nate the au­thor­ity that must pro­vi­sion­ally deal with the mat­ter.

2 Per­sons who have been ar­res­ted shall only be trans­ferred to the au­thor­it­ies of oth­er can­tons when a bind­ing de­cision on jur­is­dic­tion has been made.

3 A place of jur­is­dic­tion es­tab­lished in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 38–41 may be changed only if good cause has sub­sequently aris­en be­fore charges have been brought.

Chapter 4 Domestic Mutual Assistance

Section 1 General Provisions

Art. 43 Scope of application and definition

1 The pro­vi­sions this Chapter reg­u­late mu­tu­al as­sist­ance in crim­in­al mat­ters provided by fed­er­al and can­ton­al au­thor­it­ies to pub­lic pro­sec­utors, au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions and fed­er­al and can­ton­al courts.

2 In re­la­tion to the po­lice, these pro­vi­sions ap­ply to the ex­tent that the po­lice are act­ing on in­struc­tions from pub­lic pro­sec­utors, au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions and courts.

3 Dir­ect mu­tu­al as­sist­ance between po­lice au­thor­it­ies at fed­er­al and can­ton­al levels and between two or more can­ton­al po­lice au­thor­it­ies is per­mit­ted provided it does not re­late to com­puls­ory meas­ures that fall with­in the ex­clus­ive com­pet­ence of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court.

4 Mu­tu­al as­sist­ance is deemed to be any meas­ure re­ques­ted by an au­thor­ity with­in the scope of their com­pet­ence in on­go­ing crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 44 Obligation to provide mutual assistance 14

The fed­er­al and can­ton­al au­thor­it­ies are ob­liged to provide mu­tu­al as­sist­ance in re­spect of of­fences be­ing pro­sec­uted and ad­ju­dic­ated un­der fed­er­al law in ap­plic­a­tion of this Code.

14 The cor­rec­tion by the Fed­er­al As­sembly Draft­ing Com­mit­tee dated 10 Nov. 2014, pub­lished on 25 Nov. 2014 relates only to the French text (AS 2014 4071).

Art. 45 Support

1 The can­tons shall, to the ex­tent that it is re­quired and pos­sible, provide the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies of the Con­fed­er­a­tion and oth­er can­tons with rooms in which to carry out their of­fi­cial du­ties and for the ac­com­mod­a­tion of per­sons de­tained pending the main hear­ing.

2 At the re­quest of the fed­er­al crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies, the can­tons shall take the meas­ures re­quired to guar­an­tee the se­cur­ity of the of­fi­cial du­ties of these au­thor­it­ies.

Art. 46 Direct communication

1 The au­thor­it­ies shall com­mu­nic­ate dir­ectly with each oth­er15.

2 Re­quests for mu­tu­al as­sist­ance may be filed in the lan­guage of the re­quest­ing or the re­ques­ted au­thor­ity.

3 If there is any un­cer­tainty as to which au­thor­ity has jur­is­dic­tion, the re­quest­ing au­thor­ity shall file the re­quest for mu­tu­al as­sist­ance with the highest pub­lic pro­sec­utor of the re­ques­ted Can­ton or of the Con­fed­er­a­tion. This ser­vice shall pass the re­quest on to the rel­ev­ant of­fice.

15 De­tails of the com­pet­ent loc­al Swiss justice au­thor­ity for mu­tu­al as­sist­ance re­quests may be ob­tained from the fol­low­ing web­site: www.elorge.ad­min.ch

Art. 47 Costs

1 Mu­tu­al as­sist­ance is provided free of charge.

2 The Con­fed­er­a­tion shall re­im­burse the can­tons the costs of sup­port as defined in Art­icle 45 that it has caused them to in­cur.

3 No­tice shall be giv­en to the re­quest­ing can­ton or the Con­fed­er­a­tion of any costs that have aris­en in or­der that they may be charged to the parties li­able to pay costs.

4 The re­quest­ing can­ton or the Con­fed­er­a­tion shall bear any ob­lig­a­tions to pay dam­ages arising from mu­tu­al as­sist­ance meas­ures.

Art. 48 Disputes

1 The ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity in the rel­ev­ant can­ton shall make a fi­nal de­cision on any dis­pute over mu­tu­al as­sist­ance between au­thor­it­ies of the same can­ton.

2 The Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Court de­cides on con­flicts between fed­er­al and can­ton­al au­thor­it­ies as well as between au­thor­it­ies of dif­fer­ent can­tons.

Section 2 Procedural Acts at the Request of the Confederation or of another Canton

Art. 49 Principles

1 The fed­er­al and can­ton­al pub­lic pro­sec­utors and courts may re­quest the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies of oth­er can­tons or of the Con­fed­er­a­tion to carry out pro­ced­ur­al acts. The re­ques­ted au­thor­ity shall not ex­am­ine wheth­er the re­ques­ted pro­ced­ur­al acts are ad­miss­ible or equit­able.

2 The au­thor­it­ies of the re­quest­ing Can­ton or of the Con­fed­er­a­tion have jur­is­dic­tion to hear ap­peals against mu­tu­al as­sist­ance meas­ures. Only the im­ple­ment­a­tion of the mu­tu­al as­sist­ance meas­ures may be con­tested be­fore the au­thor­it­ies of the re­ques­ted Can­ton or of the Con­fed­er­a­tion.

Art. 50 Request for compulsory measures

1 The re­quest­ing au­thor­ity shall re­quest that a per­son be ar­res­ted with a writ­ten war­rant for an en­forced ap­pear­ance (Art. 208).

2 If pos­sible, the re­ques­ted au­thor­ity shall hand over the ar­res­ted per­sons with­in 24 hours.

3 Ap­plic­a­tions for oth­er com­puls­ory meas­ures must in­clude a brief no­tice of the grounds. In cases of ur­gency, no­tice of the grounds may be provided later.

Art. 51 Right to participate

1 The parties, their leg­al agents and the re­quest­ing au­thor­ity may par­ti­cip­ate in the re­ques­ted pro­ced­ur­al acts, in­so­far as this Code provides there­for.

2 If par­ti­cip­a­tion is pos­sible, the re­ques­ted au­thor­ity shall no­ti­fy the re­quest­ing au­thor­ity, the parties and their leg­al agents as to where and when the pro­ced­ur­al act will be car­ried out.

Section 3 Procedural Acts in another Canton

Art. 52 Principles

1 Fed­er­al and can­ton­al pub­lic pro­sec­utors, au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions and courts are en­titled to or­der and carry out any of the pro­ced­ur­al acts spe­cified in this Code dir­ectly in an­oth­er can­ton.

2 Pri­or no­tice shall be giv­en to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor of the can­ton in which the pro­ced­ur­al act is to be car­ried out. In cases of ur­gency, sub­sequent no­tice is pos­sible. No no­tice is re­quired for ob­tain­ing in­form­a­tion and for re­quest­ing the han­dover of files.

3 The costs of the pro­ced­ur­al acts and any re­lated ob­lig­a­tions to pay dam­ages shall be borne by the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton car­ry­ing out the act; it may charge the costs to the parties in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 426 and 427.

Art. 53 Using the services of the police

If the re­quest­ing au­thor­ity re­quires the sup­port of the po­lice in or­der to carry out a pro­ced­ur­al act, it shall make the rel­ev­ant re­quest to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor of the re­ques­ted Can­ton, which shall is­sue the ne­ces­sary in­struc­tions to the loc­al po­lice.

Chapter 5 International Mutual Assistance

Art. 54 Scope of Application of this Code

The pro­vi­sion of in­ter­na­tion­al mu­tu­al as­sist­ance and the mu­tu­al as­sist­ance pro­ceed­ings are gov­erned by this Code only to the ex­tent that oth­er fed­er­al acts and in­ter­na­tion­al agree­ments make no pro­vi­sion there­for.

Art. 55 Jurisdiction

1 Where a can­ton is in­volved in a case of in­ter­na­tion­al mu­tu­al as­sist­ance, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor has jur­is­dic­tion.

2 Dur­ing the main hear­ing, the courts may them­selves sub­mit re­quests for mu­tu­al as­sist­ance.

3 The powers of the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for the ex­e­cu­tion of sen­tences and meas­ures are re­served.

4 Where fed­er­al law as­signs mu­tu­al as­sist­ance du­ties to a ju­di­cial au­thor­ity, the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity has jur­is­dic­tion.

5 Where a can­ton deal­ing with a re­quest for mu­tu­al as­sist­ance from abroad car­ries out pro­ced­ur­al acts in oth­er can­tons, the pro­vi­sions on do­mest­ic mu­tu­al as­sist­ance ap­ply.

6 The can­tons shall reg­u­late any ad­di­tion­al pro­ced­ures.

Chapter 6 Recusal

Art. 56 Grounds for recusal

A per­son act­ing for a crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall re­cuse him- or her­self if he or she:

a.
has a per­son­al in­terest in the case;
b.
has ac­ted in an­oth­er ca­pa­city in the same case, and in par­tic­u­lar as a mem­ber of an au­thor­ity, as the leg­al agent for a party, as an ex­pert wit­ness, or as a wit­ness;
c.
is mar­ried to, or liv­ing in a re­gistered part­ner­ship or co­hab­it­ing with a party, his or her leg­al agent or a per­son who has ac­ted as a mem­ber of the lower court;
d.
is re­lated to a party by birth or by mar­riage dir­ectly or col­lat­er­ally up to and in­clud­ing the third de­gree;
e.
is re­lated to the leg­al agent of a party or of a per­son who ac­ted in the same case as a mem­ber of the lower court dir­ectly or col­lat­er­ally up to and in­clud­ing the second de­gree;
f.
may not be im­par­tial for oth­er reas­ons, in par­tic­u­lar due to friend­ship or enmity with a party or his or her leg­al agent.

Art. 57 Duty to notify

Where a per­son act­ing for a crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity has grounds for re­cus­al, that per­son shall no­ti­fy the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings in good time.

Art. 58 Recusal request by a party

1 If a party re­quests that a per­son act­ing for a crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity be re­cuse him- or her­self, the party must sub­mit the rel­ev­ant ap­plic­a­tion to the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings as soon as he or she be­comes aware of the grounds for re­cus­al; the cir­cum­stances jus­ti­fy­ing re­cus­al must be cred­ibly sub­stan­ti­ated.

2 The per­son con­cerned shall re­spond to the ap­plic­a­tion.

Art. 59 Decision

1 If grounds for re­cus­al in terms of Art­icle 56 let­ter a or f are claimed or if a per­son act­ing for a crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity op­poses a party ap­plic­a­tion for re­cus­al based on Art­icle 56 let­ters b–e, the fol­low­ing au­thor­it­ies shall is­sue a fi­nal de­cision without tak­ing ad­di­tion­al evid­ence:

a.
the pub­lic pro­sec­utor if mat­ter relates to the po­lice;
b.
the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity if the mat­ter relates to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions or the courts of first in­stance;
c.
the court of ap­peal if the mat­ter relates to the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity or in­di­vidu­al mem­bers of the court of ap­peal;
d.16
the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Court if the mat­ter relates to an en­tire can­ton­al court of ap­peal.

2 The de­cision shall be is­sued in writ­ing and with a state­ment of reas­ons.

3 Un­til the de­cision is is­sued, the per­son con­cerned shall con­tin­ue to ex­er­cise his of­fice.

4 If the ap­plic­a­tion is ap­proved, the pro­ced­ur­al costs are borne by the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton. If it is re­jec­ted or was clearly sub­mit­ted too late or vex­a­tious, the costs are borne by the ap­plic­ant.

16 Amended by No II 3 of the FA of 17 March 2017 (Cre­ation of an Ap­peals Cham­ber in the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Court), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2017 5769; BBl 2013 7109, 2016 6199).

Art. 60 Consequences of violating the recusal regulations

1 Where a per­son sub­ject to re­cus­al has par­ti­cip­ated in of­fi­cial acts, these acts must be an­nulled and re­peated if so re­ques­ted by a party with­in 5 days of be­com­ing aware of the de­cision on re­cus­al.

2 Evid­ence that can­not be taken again may be taken in­to con­sid­er­a­tion by the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity.

3 If the ground for re­cus­al comes to light only after con­clu­sion of the pro­ceed­ings, the pro­vi­sions on the re­view of cases ap­ply.

Chapter 7 Director of Proceedings 17

17 Revised by the Federal Assembly Drafting Committee (Art. 58 para. 1 ParlA; SR 171.10).

Art. 61 Jurisdiction

The per­sons re­spons­ible for dir­ect­ing the pro­ceed­ings are:

a.
un­til pro­ceed­ings are aban­doned or charges are brought: the pub­lic pro­sec­utor;
b.
in con­tra­ven­tion pro­ceed­ings: the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions;
c.
in court pro­ceed­ings be­fore two or more judges: the pres­id­ent of the court con­cerned;
d.
in court pro­ceed­ings be­fore one judge sit­ting alone: the judge.

Art. 62 General duties

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings makes the ar­range­ments re­quired to guar­an­tee the law­ful and or­derly con­duct of the pro­ceed­ings.

2 In court pro­ceed­ings be­fore two or more judges, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings holds all the powers that are not re­served to the court.

Art. 63 Measures to ensure order in court

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall en­sure se­cur­ity, quiet and or­der dur­ing the hear­ings.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may warn any per­son who dis­rupts the hear­ings or breaches the rules of re­spect­able be­ha­viour. In the event of any re­pe­ti­tion, he or she may deny them the right to speak, or­der them to leave the court and if ne­ces­sary have them held in po­lice cus­tody un­til the con­clu­sion of the hear­ing. He or she may or­der that the court be cleared.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may re­quest the as­sist­ance of the po­lice at the place where the pro­ceed­ings are be­ing held.

4 If a party is ex­cluded from the court, the pro­ceed­ings shall nev­er­the­less be con­tin­ued.

Art. 64 Disciplinary measures

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may or­der a per­son who dis­rupts the hear­ings, breaches the rules of re­spect­able be­ha­viour or dis­reg­ards pro­ced­ur­al or­ders to pay a fixed pen­alty fine of up to 1000 francs.

2 Fixed pen­alty fines im­posed by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the courts of first in­stance may be chal­lenged be­fore the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity with­in 10 days. Its de­cision is fi­nal.

Art. 65 Right of appeal against procedural orders issued by the court

1 Pro­ced­ur­al or­ders is­sued by the court may only be chal­lenged when the fi­nal judg­ment is is­sued.

2 If the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings in a court with two or more judges has is­sued pro­ced­ur­al or­ders be­fore the main hear­ing, the court may amend or re­voke such or­ders ex of­fi­cio or on re­quest.

Chapter 8 General Procedural Regulations

Section 1 Requirement of Oral Proceedings; Language

Art. 66 Requirement of oral proceedings

Pro­ceed­ings be­fore the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall be con­duc­ted or­ally un­less this Code provides for writ­ten pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 67 Language of the proceedings

1 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall de­term­ine the lan­guages to be used by their crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies in pro­ceed­ings.

2 The can­ton­al crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall carry out all pro­ced­ur­al acts in the lan­guages that they use in pro­ceed­ings; the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may per­mit ex­cep­tions.

Art. 68 Translation and interpretation

1 Where a party to the pro­ceed­ings does not un­der­stand the lan­guage of the pro­ceed­ings or is un­able to ex­press him- or her­self ad­equately, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall ap­point an in­ter­pret­er. In minor or ur­gent cases, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may, if the per­son con­cerned con­sents, dis­pense with ap­point­ing an in­ter­pret­er provided the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings and the clerk of court have an ad­equate com­mand of the for­eign lan­guage con­cerned.

2 Even if he or she has a de­fence law­yer, the ac­cused shall be no­ti­fied in a lan­guage that he or she un­der­stands, either or­ally or in writ­ing, of at least the es­sen­tial con­tent of the most im­port­ant pro­ced­ur­al acts. There is no right to have all pro­ced­ur­al acts and files trans­lated in full.

3 Files that are not sub­mis­sions made by parties shall, if re­quired, be trans­lated in writ­ing or or­ally trans­lated for the re­cord of pro­ceed­ings.

4 A per­son of the same sex must be ap­poin­ted to trans­late ques­tions to be put to the vic­tim of a sexu­al of­fence where the vic­tim so re­quests and it is pos­sible without caus­ing an un­reas­on­able delay to the pro­ceed­ings.

5 The pro­vi­sions on ex­pert wit­nesses (Art. 73, 105, 182–191) ap­ply mu­tatis mutandis to trans­lat­ors and in­ter­pret­ers.

Section 2 Public Proceedings

Art. 69 Principles

1 Pro­ceed­ings be­fore the court of first in­stance and the court of ap­peal, to­geth­er with the or­al passing of judg­ments and de­crees of these courts shall, with the ex­cep­tion of the judges' de­lib­er­a­tions, be con­duc­ted in pub­lic.

2 If the parties to such cases have waived their right to the pub­lic passing of judg­ment, or if a sum­mary pen­alty or­der is is­sued, in­ter­ested per­sons may in­spect the judg­ments and sum­mary pen­alty or­ders.

3 The fol­low­ing pro­ceed­ings are not con­duc­ted in pub­lic:

a.
pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings, with the ex­cep­tion of pub­lic an­nounce­ments made by the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies;
b.
pro­ceed­ings be­fore the com­puls­ory meas­ures court;
c.
pro­ceed­ings be­fore the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity and, in cases where they are con­duc­ted in writ­ing, be­fore the court of ap­peal;
d.
sum­mary pen­alty or­der pro­ceed­ings.

4 Pub­lic hear­ings are open to all mem­bers of the pub­lic; however, per­sons un­der 16 years of age shall only be ad­mit­ted with the per­mis­sion of the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 70 Restrictions on and exclusion of public access

1 The court may com­pletely or partly ex­clude mem­bers of the pub­lic from court hear­ings if:

a.
pub­lic safety or or­der or the le­git­im­ate in­terests of a per­son in­volved, and in par­tic­u­lar the vic­tim, so re­quire;
b.
too many mem­bers of the pub­lic wish ac­cess to the court.

2 If mem­bers of the pub­lic are ex­cluded, the ac­cused, the vic­tim and private claimants may each be ac­com­pan­ied by a max­im­um of three con­fid­ants.

3 Sub­ject to spe­cif­ic re­quire­ments, the court may al­low court re­port­ers and ad­di­tion­al per­sons with a le­git­im­ate in­terest ac­cess to pro­ceed­ings that are private in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 1.

4 If mem­bers of the pub­lic are ex­cluded, the court shall pass judge­ment at a pub­lic hear­ing or shall if re­quired in­form the pub­lic of the out­come of the pro­ceed­ings in an­oth­er suit­able man­ner.

Art. 71 Video and audio recordings

1 It is not per­mit­ted to make video or au­dio re­cord­ings with­in the court build­ing or to make such re­cord­ings of pro­ced­ur­al acts car­ried out out­side the court build­ing.

2 Per­sons in­fringing the fore­go­ing para­graph may be li­able to a fixed pen­alty fine in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 64 para­graph 1. Un­au­thor­ised re­cord­ings may be con­fis­cated.

Art. 72 Court reporting

The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may reg­u­late the ac­cred­it­a­tion and rights and ob­lig­a­tions of court re­port­ers.

Section 3 Confidentiality, Information to the Public, Communications to Authorities

Art. 73 Duty of confidentiality

1 Mem­bers of crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies, their em­ploy­ees and ex­perts ap­poin­ted by crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall treat as con­fid­en­tial in­form­a­tion that comes to their know­ledge in the ex­er­cise of their of­fi­cial du­ties.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may re­quire private claimants and oth­er per­sons in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings and their leg­al agents, un­der cau­tion as to Art­icle 292 SCC18, to main­tain con­fid­en­ti­al­ity with re­gard to the pro­ceed­ings and the per­sons con­cerned if the ob­ject of the pro­ceed­ings or a private in­terest so re­quires. A time lim­it must be placed on this ob­lig­a­tion.

Art. 74 Information to the public

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the courts and, with the con­sent of the courts, the po­lice may provide the pub­lic with in­form­a­tion on pending pro­ceed­ings where this is re­quired:

a.
so that the pub­lic may as­sist in en­quir­ies in­to of­fences or in loc­at­ing sus­pects;
b.
to warn or re­as­sure the pub­lic;
c.
to cor­rect in­ac­cur­ate re­ports or ru­mours;
d.
due to the spe­cial im­port­ance of a case.

2 The po­lice may also in­form the pub­lic on their own ini­ti­at­ive about ac­ci­dents and of­fences without nam­ing the per­sons in­volved.

3 When provid­ing in­form­a­tion to the pub­lic, the pre­sump­tion of in­no­cence and the per­son­al pri­vacy of the per­sons con­cerned must be ob­served.

4 In cases in­volving a vic­tim, au­thor­it­ies and private in­di­vidu­als may only identi­fy the vic­tim or provide in­form­a­tion that en­ables his or her iden­ti­fic­a­tion out­side pub­lic court pro­ceed­ings if:

a.
the as­sist­ance of the pub­lic in en­quir­ies in­to a felony or in tra­cing sus­pects is re­quired; or
b.
the vic­tim or his or her sur­viv­ors con­sent.

Art. 75 Communications with other authorities

1 Where an ac­cused is serving a sen­tence or sub­ject to a crim­in­al meas­ure, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall in­form the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for the ex­e­cu­tion of sen­tences or meas­ures of any new crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings and any de­cisions is­sued.

2 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall in­form the so­cial ser­vices and child and adult pro­tec­tion au­thor­it­ies of any crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings that have been ini­ti­ated and of any de­cisions in crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings if this is re­quired for the pro­tec­tion of an ac­cused or a per­son suf­fer­ing harm or his or her next-of-kin.19

3 If they es­tab­lish in the pro­sec­u­tion of of­fences in which minors are in­volved that fur­ther meas­ures are re­quired, they shall in­form the child pro­tec­tion au­thor­it­ies im­me­di­ately.20

3bis The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall no­ti­fy the De­fence Group of pending crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings against mem­bers of the armed forces or po­ten­tial con­scripts if there are ser­i­ous in­dic­a­tions or oth­er evid­ence that the per­son con­cerned could use a fire­arm to harm them­selves or oth­er per­sons.21

4 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may re­quire or au­thor­ise the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies to make fur­ther com­mu­nic­a­tions to au­thor­it­ies.

19Amended by An­nex No 2 of the FA of 15 Dec. 2017 (Child Pro­tec­tion), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 2947; BBl 2015 3431).

20Amended by An­nex No 2 of the FA of 15 Dec. 2017 (Child Pro­tec­tion), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 2947; BBl 2015 3431).

21 In­ser­ted by No I 2 of the FA of 25 Sept. 2015 on Im­prov­ing the Ex­change of In­form­a­tion between Au­thor­it­ies in re­la­tion to Weapons, (AS 2016 1831; BBl 2014 303). Amended by An­nex No 3 of the FA of 18 March 2016, in force since 1 Jan. 2018 (AS 2016 4277, 2017 2297; BBl 2014 6955).

Section 4 Records

Art. 76 General Provisions

1 The state­ments of the parties, the or­al de­cisions of the au­thor­it­ies and any oth­er pro­ced­ur­al acts that are not car­ried out in writ­ing shall be re­cor­ded.

2 The clerk of court, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings and, where ap­plic­able, the in­ter­pret­er or trans­lat­or shall con­firm the ac­cur­acy of the re­cord.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings is re­spons­ible for en­sur­ing that pro­ced­ur­al acts are com­pletely and cor­rectly re­cor­ded.

4 He or she may or­der that an au­dio or video re­cord­ing of all or part of a pro­ced­ur­al act be made, in ad­di­tion to its be­ing re­cor­ded in writ­ing. He or she shall give those present ad­vance no­tice of such a re­cord­ing.

Art. 77 Records of proceedings

The re­cords of pro­ceed­ings con­tain de­tails of all the es­sen­tial pro­ced­ur­al acts and in par­tic­u­lar provide in­form­a­tion on:

a.
the nature, place, date and time of the pro­ced­ur­al acts;
b.
the names of the par­ti­cipant mem­bers of au­thor­it­ies, the parties, their leg­al agents and any oth­er per­sons present;
c.
the ap­plic­a­tions of the parties;
d.
the cau­tion giv­en re­gard­ing the rights and ob­lig­a­tions of the per­sons ex­amined;
e.
the state­ments made by the per­sons ex­amined;
f.
the course of events in the pro­ceed­ings, the in­struc­tions giv­en by the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity and com­pli­ance with the form­al re­quire­ments for the in­di­vidu­al pro­ced­ur­al acts;
g.
the files and oth­er evid­ence sub­mit­ted by the per­sons in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings or oth­er­wise pro­duced in the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings;
h.
the de­cisions and the grounds there­for, un­less these are sep­ar­ately in­cluded in the files.

Art. 78 Records of hearings

1 The state­ments of the parties, wit­nesses, per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion and ex­pert wit­nesses shall be re­cor­ded as they are made.

2 The re­cord is made in the lan­guage of the pro­ceed­ings, but im­port­ant state­ments must if pos­sible be re­cor­ded in the lan­guage in which the per­son ex­amined makes them.

3 De­cis­ive ques­tions and an­swers shall be re­cor­ded ver­batim.

4 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may per­mit the per­son ex­amined to dic­tate his or her own state­ments.

5 On con­clu­sion of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing, the re­cord shall be read out to the per­son ex­amined or giv­en to him or her to read. Once aware of its con­tent, the per­son ex­amined must sign the re­cord and ini­tial each page. If he or she re­fuses to read or sign the re­cord, the re­fus­al and reas­ons giv­en for do­ing so shall be noted in the re­cord.

5bis If the ex­am­in­a­tion in the main hear­ing is re­cor­ded us­ing tech­nic­al aids, the court may dis­pense with read­ing the tran­script back to the per­son ex­amined and or giv­ing that per­son the tran­script to read and sign. The re­cord­ings are placed in the case files.22

6 In the case of hear­ings by means of video con­fer­ence, the per­son ex­amined shall make an or­al de­clar­a­tion that he or she un­der­stands the con­tent of the re­cord in­stead of sign­ing and ini­tial­ling the same. The de­clar­a­tion shall be noted in the re­cord.

7 If re­cords writ­ten by hand are not eas­ily legible or if the state­ments have been re­cor­ded in short­hand, a legible copy shall be pre­pared im­me­di­ately. Notes shall be pre­served un­til the con­clu­sion of the pro­ceed­ings.23

22 In­ser­ted by No I 2 of the FA of 28 Sept. 2012 (Tran­scrip­tion Reg­u­la­tions), in force since 1 May 2013 (AS 2013 851; BBl 2012 57075719).

23 Amended by No I 2 of the FA of 28 Sept. 2012 (Tran­scrip­tion Reg­u­la­tions), in force since 1 May 2013 (AS 2013 851; BBl 2012 57075719).

Art. 79 Corrections

1 Ob­vi­ous er­rors shall be cor­rec­ted by the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings and the clerk of court; the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall there­after no­ti­fy the parties of the cor­rec­tions.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall de­cide on re­quests to have the re­cords cor­rec­ted.

3 Cor­rec­tions, al­ter­a­tions, de­le­tions and ad­di­tions shall be cer­ti­fied by the clerk of court and the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings. Any al­ter­a­tions to the con­tent shall be made in such a man­ner that the ori­gin­al re­cord re­mains re­cog­nis­able.

Section 5 Decisions

Art. 80 Form

1 De­cisions that de­term­ine sub­stant­ive crim­in­al or civil is­sues are is­sued in the form of a judg­ment. Oth­er de­cisions, if made by a ju­di­cial au­thor­ity com­pris­ing two or more mem­bers, are is­sued in the form of a de­cree, or if they are made by a single per­son, in the form of a rul­ing. The pro­vi­sions on sum­mary pen­alty or­der pro­ced­ures are re­served.

2 De­cisions are is­sued in writ­ing and con­tain a state­ment of the grounds. They are signed by the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings and the clerk of court and are served on the parties.

3 Simple pro­ced­ur­al de­crees and rul­ings do not re­quire to be is­sued in any spe­cif­ic form or to con­tain a state­ment of grounds; they are noted in the case re­cords and no­ti­fied to the parties in a suit­able man­ner.

Art. 81 Content of final judgments

1 Judg­ments and oth­er de­cisions con­clud­ing pro­ceed­ings con­tain:

a.
an in­tro­duc­tion;
b.
a state­ment of the grounds;
c.
con­clu­sions;
d.
if sub­ject to ap­peal: in­struc­tions on ap­pel­late rem­ed­ies.

2 The in­tro­duc­tion con­tains:

a.
de­tails of the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity and its mem­bers who par­ti­cip­ated in mak­ing the de­cision;
b.
the date of the de­cision;
c.
suf­fi­cient de­tails of the parties and of their leg­al agents;
d.
in the case of judg­ments, the fi­nal sub­mis­sions made by the parties.

3 The state­ment of the grounds con­tains:

a.
in the case of judg­ments: an ap­prais­al of the fac­tu­al and leg­al is­sues re­lat­ing to the con­duct in­crim­in­at­ing the ac­cused, and an ex­plan­a­tion of why any sanc­tions, in­cid­ent­al leg­al or­ders and costs or dam­ages were im­posed;
b.
in the case of oth­er de­cisions con­clud­ing pro­ceed­ings: the reas­ons for con­clud­ing the pro­ceed­ings.

4 The con­clu­sions con­tain:

a.
de­tails of the stat­utory pro­vi­sions;
b.
in the case of judg­ments: the ver­dict and de­cisions on re­lated sanc­tions, costs and dam­ages and any civil claims;
c.
in the case of oth­er de­cisions con­clud­ing pro­ceed­ings: the or­der con­clud­ing the pro­ceed­ings;
d.
the sub­sequent de­cisions of the court;
e.
the de­cision on the in­cid­ent­al leg­al or­ders;
f.
the de­tails of the per­sons and au­thor­it­ies who are to re­ceive a copy of the de­cision or of the con­clu­sions.

Art. 82 Limitations to the duty to state grounds

1 The court of first in­stance shall dis­pense with a writ­ten state­ment of the grounds if it:

a.
states the grounds for the judg­ment or­ally; and
b.
it does not im­pose a cus­todi­al sen­tence of more than two years, in­def­in­ite in­car­cer­a­tion un­der Art­icle 64 SCC24, treat­ment in terms of Art­icle 59 para­graph 3 SCC or, in the case of sus­pen­ded sanc­tions to be re­voked sim­ul­tan­eously, a depriva­tion of liberty of more than two years.

2 The court shall provide the parties ret­ro­spect­ively with a writ­ten judg­ment stat­ing the grounds if:

a.
a party re­quests the same with­in 10 days of ser­vice of the con­clu­sions;
b.
a party files an ap­peal.

3 If it is only the private claimant who re­quests a writ­ten judg­ment stat­ing the grounds or who ap­peals, the court shall provide a state­ment of grounds only to the ex­tent that this relates to the crim­in­al con­duct to the pre­ju­dice of the private claimant and to his or her civil claims.

4 In the ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings, the court may refer to the grounds stated by the lower court in its ap­prais­al of the fac­tu­al and the leg­al is­sues in the case.

Art. 83 Explanation and correction of decisions

1 If the con­clu­sions to the de­cision are un­clear, con­tra­dict­ory or in­com­plete, or if they are in­con­sist­ent with the grounds, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity that made the de­cision shall ex­plain or cor­rect the de­cision on the ap­plic­a­tion of a party or on its own ini­ti­at­ive.

2 The ap­plic­a­tion must be sub­mit­ted in writ­ing, in­dic­at­ing the mat­ters that are con­tested or the amend­ment that are re­ques­ted.

3 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall al­low the oth­er parties the op­por­tun­ity to com­ment on the ap­plic­a­tion.

4 No­tice of the ex­plan­a­tion for or cor­rec­tions to the de­cision shall be giv­en to the parties.

Section 6 Notice and Service of Decisions

Art. 84 Notice of decisions

1 If the pro­ceed­ings are pub­lic, the court shall give no­tice of the judg­ment or­ally on con­clu­sion of its de­lib­er­a­tions and state the grounds in brief.

2 The court shall provide the parties with a writ­ten copy of the con­clu­sions at the end of the main hear­ing or serve it on the parties with­in 5 days.

3 If the court is un­able to is­sue the judg­ment im­me­di­ately, it shall do so as soon as pos­sible and give no­tice of the judg­ment in re­arranged main hear­ing. If in such an event the parties waive their right to have the judg­ment is­sued pub­licly, the court shall serve the con­clu­sions of the judg­ment on them im­me­di­ately after it has been reached.

4 If the court has to state grounds for the judg­ment, it shall serve the judg­ment with a full state­ment of grounds on the ac­cused and the pub­lic pro­sec­utor with­in 60 days, or by way of ex­cep­tion 90 days. The oth­er parties shall be served only with those parts of the judg­ment in which their ap­plic­a­tions are men­tioned.

5 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall give no­tice of simple pro­ced­ur­al de­crees or rul­ings to the parties in writ­ing or or­ally.

6 No­tice of de­cisions shall be giv­en to oth­er au­thor­it­ies in ac­cord­ance with fed­er­al and can­ton­al law, no­tice of ap­peal de­cisions shall also be giv­en to the lower court, and no­tice of leg­ally bind­ing de­cisions shall if ne­ces­sary be giv­en to the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for the ex­e­cu­tion of sen­tences and meas­ures and to the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for the re­gister of con­vic­tions.

Art. 85 Form and service of communications

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall is­sue com­mu­nic­a­tions in writ­ing, un­less this Code provides oth­er­wise.

2 Ser­vice shall be ef­fected by re­gistered mail or in any oth­er way provided con­firm­a­tion of re­ceipt is ob­tained, and in par­tic­u­lar by per­son­al ser­vice by the po­lice

3 It is ef­fected if the de­liv­ery is ac­cep­ted by ad­dress­ee or by an em­ploy­ee there­of or a per­son liv­ing in the same house­hold who is at least 16 years old, un­less the law en­force­ment au­thor­ity has in­struc­ted that de­liv­ery be made to the ad­dress­ee in per­son.

4 It is also deemed to be ef­fected:

a.
in the case of a de­liv­ery by re­gistered mail that is not col­lec­ted: on the sev­enth day fol­low­ing the un­suc­cess­ful at­tempt at ser­vice, provided the per­son is ex­pect­ing the de­liv­ery;
b.
in the case of per­son­al ser­vice, if the ad­dress­ee re­fuses to ac­cept ser­vice and this is re­cor­ded by the mes­sen­ger: on the day of re­fus­al.

Art. 86 Electronic service 25

1 With the con­sent of the per­son con­cerned, com­mu­nic­a­tions may be served elec­tron­ic­ally. They must bear an elec­tron­ic sig­na­ture in ac­cord­ance with the Fed­er­al Act of 18 March 201626 on Elec­tron­ic Sig­na­tures.

2 The Fed­er­al Coun­cil shall reg­u­late:

a.
the sig­na­ture to be used;
b.
the format for com­mu­nic­a­tions and their at­tach­ments;
c.
the meth­od of trans­mis­sion;
d.
the point in time at which the com­mu­nic­a­tion is deemed to have been served.

25 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on Elec­tron­ic Sig­na­tures, in force since 1 Jan. 2017 (AS 2016 4651; BBl 2014 1001).

26 SR 943.03

Art. 87 Address for service

1 Com­mu­nic­a­tions must be served on ad­dress­ees at their dom­i­cile, their ha­bitu­al place of res­id­ence or their re­gistered of­fice.

2 Parties and leg­al agents whose dom­i­cile, ha­bitu­al place of res­id­ence or re­gistered of­fice is abroad must provide an ad­dress for ser­vice in Switzer­land; pro­vi­sions of in­ter­na­tion­al agree­ments un­der which com­mu­nic­a­tions may be served dir­ectly are re­served.

3 Com­mu­nic­a­tions ad­dress to parties who have ap­poin­ted a leg­al agent are val­idly served if sent to the agent.

4 Where a party is re­quired to ap­pear per­son­ally at a hear­ing or must per­son­ally carry out a pro­ced­ur­al act, the re­lated com­mu­nic­a­tion shall be served dir­ectly on that party. A copy shall be sent to the leg­al agent.

Art. 88 Public notice

1 Ser­vice shall be ef­fected by pub­lic­a­tion in an of­fi­cial gaz­ette des­ig­nated by the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton where:

a.
the where­abouts of the ad­dress­ee are un­known and can­not be as­cer­tained des­pite mak­ing reas­on­able en­quir­ies;
b.
ser­vice is im­possible or would lead to ex­cep­tion­al in­con­veni­ence;
c.
a party or his or her leg­al agent with dom­i­cile, ha­bitu­al res­id­ence or re­gistered of­fice abroad has failed to provide an ad­dress for ser­vice in Switzer­land.

2 Ser­vice is deemed to be ef­fected on the day of pub­lic­a­tion.

3 In the case of fi­nal judg­ments, only the con­clu­sions of the judg­ment shall be pub­lished.

4 De­cisions to take no pro­ceed­ings and sum­mary pen­alty or­ders are deemed to be served without pub­lic­a­tion be­ing re­quired.

Section 7 Time Limits and Deadlines

Art. 89 General Provisions

1 Stat­utory time lim­its may not be ex­ten­ded.

2 There are no court hol­i­days in crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 90 Commencement and calculation of time limits

1 Time lim­its that are triggered by a com­mu­nic­a­tion or the oc­cur­rence of an event be­gin to run from the fol­low­ing day.

2 If the time lim­it is due to ex­pire on a Sat­urday, a Sunday or a pub­lic hol­i­day re­cog­nised un­der fed­er­al or can­ton­al law, it shall ex­pire on the next work­ing day. The mat­ter shall be de­term­ined by the law of the can­ton in which the party or his or her leg­al agent is res­id­ent or has its re­gistered of­fice.27

27 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125).

Art. 91 Compliance with time limits

1 The time lim­it is com­plied with if the pro­ced­ur­al act is car­ried out to the sat­is­fac­tion of the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity on the day of ex­piry at the latest.

2 Sub­mis­sions must be de­livered on the day of ex­piry of the time lim­it at the latest to the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity or handed for de­liv­ery to Swis­s­Post, a Swiss dip­lo­mat­ic or con­su­lar rep­res­ent­a­tion or, in the case of per­sons in cus­tody, the gov­ernor of the in­sti­tu­tion.

3 In case of elec­tron­ic sub­mis­sion, the rel­ev­ant time for com­pli­ance with a time lim­it is that at which the re­ceipt is is­sued that con­firms that all the steps have been com­pleted that the party must carry out for trans­mis­sion.28

4 The time lim­it is also deemed to be com­plied with if the sub­mis­sion is re­ceived by a Swiss au­thor­ity not com­pet­ent in the mat­ter on the day of ex­piry at the latest. This au­thor­ity shall pass the sub­mis­sion on im­me­di­ately to the com­pet­ent crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity.

5 The time lim­it for mak­ing a pay­ment to a crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity is com­plied with if the amount due is handed to Swis­s­Post or is deb­ited from a postal or bank ac­count in Switzer­land in fa­vour of the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity on the day of ex­piry at the latest.

28 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on Elec­tron­ic Sig­na­tures, in force since 1 Jan. 2017 (AS 2016 4651; BBl 2014 1001).

Art. 92 Extension of time limits and postponement of hearings

The au­thor­it­ies may ex­tend time lim­its and post­pone hear­ings ex of­fi­cio or in re­sponse to an ap­plic­a­tion. The ap­plic­a­tion must be made be­fore the ex­piry of the time lim­it and be ad­equately jus­ti­fied.

Art. 93 Default

A party is in de­fault if he or she fails to carry out a pro­ced­ur­al act in time or fails to ap­pear for a hear­ing.

Art. 94 New time limit

1 Where a party has failed to com­ply with a time lim­it and has thus in­curred a sig­ni­fic­ant and ir­re­medi­able loss of rights, he or she may re­quest that a new time lim­it be fixed; in do­ing so he or she must cred­ibly show that he or she was not at fault for the fail­ure to com­ply with the time lim­it.

2 The ap­plic­a­tion must be made in writ­ing with a state­ment of reas­ons and sub­mit­ted with­in 30 days of the reas­on for de­fault ceas­ing to ap­ply to the au­thor­ity be­fore which the rel­ev­ant pro­ced­ur­al act should have been car­ried out. The rel­ev­ant pro­ced­ur­al act must be car­ried out with­in the same time lim­it.

3 The ap­plic­a­tion only has sus­pens­ive ef­fect if the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity grants the same.

4 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall de­cide on the ap­plic­a­tion in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings.

5 Para­graphs 1–4 ap­ply mu­tatis mutandis in the event of fail­ure to at­tend a hear­ing. If a new hear­ing is gran­ted, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall fix a new date. The pro­vi­sions on pro­ceed­ings in ab­sen­tia are re­served.

Section 8 Data Processing

Art. 95 Obtaining personal data

1 Per­son­al data must be ob­tained from the per­son con­cerned or with that per­son's know­ledge un­less the pro­ceed­ings would be oth­er­wise be pre­ju­diced or un­reas­on­able in­con­veni­ence or ex­pense would be in­curred.

2 If per­son­al data is ob­tained without the know­ledge of the per­son con­cerned, that per­son must be no­ti­fied there­of im­me­di­ately. Where over­rid­ing pub­lic or private in­terests so re­quire, no­ti­fic­a­tion may be dis­pensed with or post­poned.

Art. 95a Processing of personal data 29

When pro­cessing per­son­al data, the com­pet­ent crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall en­sure that they make a dis­tinc­tion, as far as pos­sible:

a.
between the dif­fer­ent cat­egor­ies of data sub­jects;
b.
between per­son­al data based on facts and per­son­al data based on per­son­al as­sess­ments.

29 In­ser­ted by No II 3 of the FA of 28 Sept. 2018 on the im­ple­ment­a­tion of Dir­ect­ive (EU) 2016/680 on the pro­tec­tion of nat­ur­al per­sons with re­gard to the pro­cessing of per­son­al data by com­pet­ent au­thor­it­ies for the pur­poses of the pre­ven­tion, in­vest­ig­a­tion, de­tec­tion or pro­sec­u­tion of crim­in­al of­fences or the ex­e­cu­tion of crim­in­al pen­al­ties, in force since 1 March 2019 (AS 2019 625; BBl 2017 6941).

Art. 96 Disclosure and use in pending criminal proceedings

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity may dis­close per­son­al data from pending pro­ceed­ings for use in oth­er pending pro­ceed­ings if it is an­ti­cip­ated that the data may provide es­sen­tial in­form­a­tion.

2 The fore­go­ing para­graph does not ap­ply to:

a.
Art­icles 11, 13, 14 and 20 of the Fed­er­al Act of 21 March 199730 on Meas­ures to Safe­guard In­tern­al Se­cur­ity;
b.
the reg­u­la­tions of the Fed­er­al Act of 13 June 200831 on the Fed­er­al Po­lice In­form­a­tion Sys­tems;
c.
the reg­u­la­tions of the Fed­er­al Act of 7 Oc­to­ber 199432 on the Cent­ral Of­fices of the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Po­lice.33

30 SR 120

31 SR 361

32 SR 360

33 Amended by An­nex 2 No I 1 let. a of the FA of 13 June 2008 on the Fed­er­al Po­lice In­form­a­tion Sys­tems, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2008 4989; BBl 2006 5061).

Art. 97 Rights to information in the case of pending proceedings

As long as pro­ceed­ings are pending, the parties and the oth­er par­ti­cipants in the pro­ceed­ings have, in ac­cord­ance with their right to in­spect case doc­u­ments, the right to in­form­a­tion on per­son­al data re­lat­ing to them that has been pro­cessed.

Art. 98 Correction of data

1 Where per­son­al data proves to be in­cor­rect, the rel­ev­ant crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall cor­rect it im­me­di­ately.

2 They shall im­me­di­ately no­ti­fy au­thor­it­ies to which they have trans­mit­ted, made avail­able or dis­closed the data of the cor­rec­tions.34

34 Amended by No II 3 of the FA of 28 Sept. 2018 on the im­ple­ment­a­tion of Dir­ect­ive (EU) 2016/680 on the pro­tec­tion of nat­ur­al per­sons with re­gard to the pro­cessing of per­son­al data by com­pet­ent au­thor­it­ies for the pur­poses of the pre­ven­tion, in­vest­ig­a­tion, de­tec­tion or pro­sec­u­tion of crim­in­al of­fences or the ex­e­cu­tion of crim­in­al pen­al­ties, in force since 1 March 2019 (AS 2019 625; BBl 2017 6941).

Art. 99 Processing and retention of personal data after conclusion of the proceedings

1 After con­clu­sion of the pro­ceed­ings, the pro­cessing of per­son­al data, pro­ced­ures and leg­al pro­tec­tion are gov­erned by the pro­vi­sions of fed­er­al and can­ton­al data pro­tec­tion law.

2 The peri­od of re­ten­tion of per­son­al data after con­clu­sion of pro­ceed­ings is gov­erned by Art­icle 103.

3 The pro­vi­sions of the Fed­er­al Act of 7 Oc­to­ber 199435 on the Cent­ral Of­fices of the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Po­lice, the Fed­er­al Act of 13 June 200836 on the Fed­er­al Po­lice In­form­a­tion Sys­tems and the pro­vi­sions of this Code on identi­fy­ing doc­u­ments and DNA pro­files are re­served.37

35 SR 360

36 SR 361

37 Amended by An­nex 2 No I 1 let. a of the FA of 13 June 2008 on the Fed­er­al Po­lice In­form­a­tion Sys­tems, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2008 4989; BBl 2006 5061).

Section 9 Management, Inspection and Retention of Case Files

Art. 100 File management

1 A case file shall be opened for each crim­in­al case. This file shall con­tain:

a.
the re­cords of pro­ceed­ings and ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings;
b.
the doc­u­ments com­plied by the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity;
c.
the doc­u­ments sub­mit­ted by the parties.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall en­sure the sys­tem­at­ic fil­ing of doc­u­ments and se­quen­tial in­dex­ing; in simple cases, an in­dex is not re­quired.

Art. 101 Inspection of case documents in pending proceedings

1 The parties may in­spect the doc­u­ments re­lat­ing to the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings at the latest fol­low­ing the first in­ter­view with the ac­cused and the gath­er­ing of the oth­er most im­port­ant evid­ence by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor; Art­icle 108 is re­served.

2 Oth­er au­thor­it­ies may in­spect the case doc­u­ments if they need to do so for the pur­poses of pending civil, crim­in­al or ad­min­is­trat­ive pro­ceed­ings and in­spec­tion is not con­trary to any over­rid­ing pub­lic or private in­terests.

3 Third parties may in­spect the case doc­u­ments if they claim to have an aca­dem­ic or oth­er le­git­im­ate in­terest in do­ing so and in­spec­tion is not con­trary to any over­rid­ing pub­lic or private in­terests.

Art. 102 Procedure relating to applications to inspect case documents

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings de­cides on wheth­er case doc­u­ments may be in­spec­ted. He or she shall take the meas­ures re­quired to pre­vent ab­uses and delays and to pro­tect le­git­im­ate in­terests in con­fid­en­ti­al­ity.

2 The case doc­u­ments must be in­spec­ted at the of­fices of the rel­ev­ant crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity or those of an­oth­er crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity in mu­tu­al as­sist­ance pro­ceed­ings. Nor­mally they shall be de­livered to oth­er au­thor­it­ies or the leg­al agents for the parties.

3 Any per­son who is en­titled to in­spect case doc­u­ments may re­quest cop­ies there­of for a fee.

Art. 103 Retention of case documents

1 The case doc­u­ments must be pre­served at least un­til con­clu­sion of the time lim­its for pro­sec­u­tion and for the ex­e­cu­tion of the sen­tence have ex­pired.

2 The fore­go­ing para­graph does not ap­ply to ori­gin­al doc­u­ments in­cluded in the case file; they must be re­turned to the per­sons en­titled thereto against writ­ten ac­know­ledge­ment of re­ceipt as soon as the crim­in­al case has been de­cided by a fi­nal judg­ment.

Title 3 Parties and Other Persons involved in the Proceedings

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Section 1 Definition and Status

Art. 104 Parties

1 Parties are:

a.
the ac­cused;
b.
the private claimant;
c.
in the main hear­ing and in ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings: the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

2 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may grant full or lim­ited party rights to oth­er au­thor­it­ies that are re­quired to safe­guard pub­lic in­terests.

Art. 105 Other persons involved in the proceedings

1 Oth­er per­sons in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings are:

a.
per­sons suf­fer­ing harm;
b.
the per­son who has re­por­ted the of­fence;
c.
wit­nesses;
d.
per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion;
e.
ex­pert wit­nesses;
f.
third parties who have suffered det­ri­ment due to pro­ced­ur­al acts.

2 If the rights of per­sons in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings named in para­graph 1 are dir­ectly af­fected, they shall, in or­der to safe­guard their in­terests, be en­titled to the pro­ced­ur­al rights of a party.

Art. 106 Capacity to act

1 The party may val­idly carry out pro­ced­ur­al acts only if he or she has the ca­pa­city to act.

2 A per­son lack­ing the ca­pa­city to act shall be rep­res­en­ted by his or her stat­utory rep­res­ent­at­ive.

3 A per­son with ca­pa­city of judge­ment who lacks the ca­pa­city to act may, in ad­di­tion to his or her leg­al agent, ex­er­cise pro­ced­ur­al rights that are of a highly per­son­al nature.

Art. 107 Right to be heard

1 The parties have the right to be heard; in par­tic­u­lar, they have the right:

a.
to in­spect case doc­u­ments;
b.
to par­ti­cip­ate in pro­ced­ur­al acts
c.
to ap­point a leg­al agent;
d.
to com­ment on the case and on the pro­ceed­ings;
e.
to re­quest that fur­ther evid­ence be taken.

2 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall no­ti­fy parties who are un­aware of the law of their rights.

Art. 108 Restriction of the right to be heard

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies may re­strict the right to be heard if:

a.
there is jus­ti­fied sus­pi­cion that a party is ab­us­ing his or her rights;
b.
this is re­quired for the safety of per­sons or to safe­guard pub­lic or private in­terests in pre­serving con­fid­en­ti­al­ity.

2 Re­stric­tions in re­la­tion to leg­al agents are only per­mit­ted if the leg­al agent gives per­son­al cause for im­pos­ing a re­stric­tion.

3 Re­stric­tions must be lim­ited in time or to in­di­vidu­al pro­ced­ur­al acts.

4 If the reas­on for im­pos­ing the re­stric­tion con­tin­ues to ap­ply, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies may base their de­cisions on files that have not been dis­closed to a party only if that party has been in­formed of the es­sen­tial con­tent there­of.

5 If the reas­on for the re­stric­tion has ceased to ap­ply, the right to be heard must be gran­ted in a suit­able form ret­ro­spect­ively.

Section 2 Procedural Acts by the Parties

Art. 109 Submissions

1 The parties may make sub­mis­sions to the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings at any time, sub­ject to the spe­cif­ic pro­vi­sions there­on in this Code.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall ex­am­ine the sub­mis­sions and give the oth­er parties the op­por­tun­ity to com­ment.

Art. 110 Form

1 Sub­mis­sions may be made in writ­ing or or­ally on re­cord. Writ­ten sub­mis­sions must be dated and signed.

2 In the case of elec­tron­ic sub­mis­sion, the sub­mis­sion and its en­clos­ures must bear a qual­i­fied elec­tron­ic sig­na­ture in ac­cord­ance with the Fed­er­al Act of 18 March 201638 on Elec­tron­ic Sig­na­tures. The Fed­er­al Coun­cil shall reg­u­late:

a.
the format for sub­mis­sions and their at­tach­ments;
b.
the meth­od of trans­mis­sion;
c.
the re­quire­ments for re­quest­ing the sub­mis­sion of doc­u­ments in pa­per form in the event of tech­nic­al prob­lems.39

3 Pro­ced­ur­al acts are not oth­er­wise sub­ject to any form­al re­quire­ments un­less this Code provides oth­er­wise.

4 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may re­ject il­legible, in­com­pre­hens­ible, im­prop­er or in­co­her­ent sub­mis­sions; they shall fix a dead­line for the re­vi­sion of the sub­mis­sion and give no­tice that the sub­mis­sion if not re­vised, will not be con­sidered.

38 SR 943.03

39 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on Elec­tron­ic Sig­na­tures, in force since 1 Jan. 2017 (AS 2016 4651; BBl 2014 1001).

Chapter 2 The Accused

Art. 111 Definition

1 For the pur­poses of this Code, the ac­cused is a per­son sus­pec­ted, ac­cused of or charged with an of­fence in a re­port of a crim­in­al of­fence, a crim­in­al com­plaint or in a pro­ced­ur­al act car­ried out by a crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity.

2 The rights and the ob­lig­a­tions of an ac­cused also ap­ply to per­sons in re­spect of whom it is in­ten­ded to bring new pro­ceed­ings fol­low­ing aban­don­ment or a judg­ment in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 323 or Art­icles 410–415.

Art. 112 Criminal proceedings against corporate undertakings

1 In crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings against a cor­por­ate un­der­tak­ing, the un­der­tak­ing shall be rep­res­en­ted by a single per­son who has un­lim­ited au­thor­ity to rep­res­ent the un­der­tak­ing in private law mat­ters.

2 If the un­der­tak­ing fails to ap­point such a rep­res­ent­at­ive with­in a reas­on­able time, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall de­cide which of the per­sons au­thor­ised to rep­res­ent the un­der­tak­ing in private law mat­ters will rep­res­ent the un­der­tak­ing in the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings.

3 If a crim­in­al in­vest­ig­a­tion is opened against the per­son rep­res­ent­ing the un­der­tak­ing in the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings in re­spect of the same or re­lated cir­cum­stances, the un­der­tak­ing must ap­point an­oth­er rep­res­ent­at­ive. If ne­ces­sary, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall ap­point an­oth­er per­son to rep­res­ent the un­der­tak­ing in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 2, or if no one is avail­able, a suit­able third party.

4 If pro­ceed­ings are brought against a nat­ur­al per­son and an un­der­tak­ing in re­spect of the same or re­lated cir­cum­stances, the two pro­ceed­ings may be com­bined.

Art. 113 Status

1 The ac­cused may not be com­pelled to in­crim­in­ate him or her­self. In par­tic­u­lar, the ac­cused is en­titled to re­fuse to make a state­ment or to co­oper­ate in the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings. He or she must however sub­mit to the com­puls­ory meas­ures provided for by the law.

2 The pro­ceed­ings con­tin­ue ir­re­spect­ive of wheth­er the ac­cused co­oper­ates.

Art. 114 Fitness to plead

1 An ac­cused is fit to plead if he or she is phys­ic­ally and men­tally cap­able of un­der­stand­ing the pro­ceed­ings.

2 In the event of tem­por­ary un­fit­ness to plead, pro­ced­ur­al acts that can­not be delayed shall be car­ried out in the pres­ence of the de­fence.

3 If the ac­cused re­mains un­fit to plead, the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings shall be sus­pen­ded or aban­doned. The spe­cial pro­vi­sions on pro­ceed­ings against an ac­cused who is not leg­ally re­spons­ible due to a men­tal dis­order are re­served.

Chapter 3 Persons suffering Harm, Victims and Private Claimants

Section 1 Persons suffering Harm

Art. 115

1 A per­son suf­fer­ing harm is a per­son whose rights have been dir­ectly vi­ol­ated by the of­fence.

2 A per­son en­titled to file a crim­in­al com­plaint is deemed in every case to be a per­son suf­fer­ing harm.

Section 2 Victims

Art. 116 Definitions

1 A vic­tim is a per­son suf­fer­ing harm whose phys­ic­al, sexu­al or men­tal in­teg­rity has been dir­ectly and ad­versely af­fected by the of­fence.

2 Re­l­at­ives of the vic­tim are his or her spouse, chil­dren and par­ents, and per­sons closely re­lated to him or her in a sim­il­ar way.

Art. 117 Status

1 Vic­tims have spe­cial rights, in par­tic­u­lar:

a.
the right to pro­tec­tion of per­son­al pri­vacy (Art. 70 para. 1 let. a, 74 para. 4, 152 para. 1);
b.
the right to be ac­com­pan­ied by a con­fid­ant (Art. 70 para. 2, 152 para. 2);
c.
the right to pro­tect­ive meas­ures (Art. 152–154);
d.
the right to re­main si­lent (Art. 169 para. 4);
e.
the right to in­form­a­tion (Art. 305 and 330 para. 3);
f.
the right to a spe­cial com­pos­i­tion of the court (Art. 335 para. 4).

2 In the case of vic­tims un­der the age of 18, ad­di­tion­al spe­cial pro­vi­sions pro­tect­ing per­son­al pri­vacy ap­ply, in par­tic­u­lar re­lat­ing to:

a.
re­stric­tions on con­front­a­tion hear­ings with the ac­cused (Art. 154 para. 4);
b.
spe­cial pro­tect­ive meas­ures dur­ing ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings (Art. 154 para. 2–4);
c.
aban­don­ment of the pro­ceed­ings (Art. 319 para. 2).

3 If re­l­at­ives of a vic­tim file civil claims, they are en­titled to the same rights as the vic­tim.

Section 3 Private Claimants

Art. 118 Definition and requirements

1 A private claimant is a per­son suf­fer­ing harm who ex­pressly de­clares that he or she wishes to par­ti­cip­ate in the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings as a crim­in­al or civil claimant.

2 The fil­ing of a crim­in­al com­plaint is re­garded as be­ing equi­val­ent to such a de­clar­a­tion.

3 The de­clar­a­tion must be made to a crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity by the end of the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings at the latest.

4 If a per­son suf­fer­ing harm has not made a de­clar­a­tion of his or her own vo­li­tion, so the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall ad­vise the per­son of this pos­sib­il­ity after open­ing the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 119 Form and content of the declaration

1 A per­son suf­fer­ing harm may sub­mit a writ­ten de­clar­a­tion in writ­ing or make the de­clar­a­tion or­ally on re­cord.

2 In the de­clar­a­tion the per­son suf­fer­ing harm may do either or both of the fol­low­ing:

a.
re­quest the pro­sec­u­tion and pun­ish­ment of the per­son re­spons­ible for the of­fence (a crim­in­al com­plaint);
b.
file private law claims based on the of­fence (a civil claim).

Art. 120 Waiver and withdrawal

1 The per­son suf­fer­ing harm may at any time de­clare either in writ­ing or or­ally on re­cord that he or she waives his or her rights. The waiver is fi­nal.

2 Un­less the waiver is ex­pressly lim­ited, it shall be deemed to cov­er both the crim­in­al and the civil pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 121 Legal successors

1 If the per­son suf­fer­ing harm dies without waiv­ing his or her pro­ced­ur­al rights as a private claimant, such rights pass to his or her re­l­at­ives as defined in Art­icle 110 para­graph 1 SCC40 in ac­cord­ance with their rank­ing un­der the law of suc­ces­sion.

2 Any per­son who by law ac­quires the rights as a claimant of a per­son suf­fer­ing harm does so only in re­spect of the civil claim and has only those pro­ced­ur­al rights that re­late dir­ectly to the as­ser­tion of the civil claim.

Section 4 Civil Claims

Art. 122 General Provisions

1 The per­son suf­fer­ing harm may bring civil claims based on the of­fence as a private claimant in the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings.

2 The re­l­at­ives of the vic­tim have the same right provided they bring their own civil claims against the ac­cused.

3 The civil pro­ceed­ings be­come pending when a de­clar­a­tion in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 119 para­graph 2 let­ter b is made.

4 If a private claimant with­draws the civil claim be­fore the end of the main hear­ing be­fore the court of first in­stance, they may file the claim again in civil pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 123 Quantification and statement of the grounds

1 The civil claim must if pos­sible be quan­ti­fied in the de­clar­a­tion made in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 119 and a brief state­ment of the grounds must be provided, de­tail­ing the rel­ev­ant evid­ence.

2 The quan­ti­fic­a­tion and state­ment of the grounds must be spe­cified in the party sub­mis­sions at the latest.

Art. 124 Jurisdiction and procedure

1 The court hear­ing the crim­in­al case shall judge the civil claim re­gard­less of the amount in­volved.

2 The ac­cused shall be giv­en the op­por­tun­ity to re­spond to the civil claim in the main pro­ceed­ings be­fore the court of first in­stance at the latest.

3 If the ac­cused ac­cepts the civil claim, this shall be placed on re­cord and re­cor­ded in the de­cision con­clud­ing the pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 125 Security for the claims against the private claimant

1 A private claimant, with the ex­cep­tion of the vic­tim, must on ap­plic­a­tion by the ac­cused lodge se­cur­ity in re­spect of the ac­cused's prob­able costs arising from the civil claim if:

a.
he or she is not dom­i­ciled or has no re­gistered of­fice in Switzer­land;
b.
he or she ap­pears to be in­solv­ent, in par­tic­u­lar if bank­ruptcy pro­ceed­ings have been opened or com­pos­i­tion pro­ceed­ings are on­go­ing or if cer­ti­fic­ates of loss have been is­sued;
c.
for oth­er reas­ons, there is reas­on to fear that the ac­cused's claim could be ser­i­ously jeop­ard­ised or frus­trated.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings for the court shall is­sue a fi­nal judg­ment on the ap­plic­a­tion. He or she shall de­term­ine the amount of se­cur­ity and fix a time lim­it for its pay­ment.

3 The se­cur­ity may be paid in cash or take the form of a guar­an­tee from a bank per­man­ently es­tab­lished in Switzer­land.

4 It may be ret­ro­spect­ively in­creased, re­duced or re­voked.

Art. 126 Decision

1 The court de­cides on pending civil claims in the event that it:

a.
con­victs the ac­cused;
b.
ac­quits the ac­cused and the court is in a po­s­i­tion to make a de­cision.

2 The civil claim shall be re­ferred for civil pro­ceed­ings if:

a.
the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings are aban­doned or con­cluded by means of the sum­mary pen­alty or­der pro­ced­ure;
b.
the private claimant has failed to jus­ti­fy or quanti­fy the claim suf­fi­ciently;
c.
the private claimant has failed to lodge se­cur­ity in re­spect of the claim;
d.
the ac­cused has been ac­quit­ted but the court is not in a po­s­i­tion to make a de­cision.

3 If a full as­sess­ment of the civil claim would cause un­reas­on­able ex­pense and in­con­veni­ence, the court may make a de­cision in prin­ciple on the civil claim and refer it for civil pro­ceed­ings. If pos­sible, the court shall rule on minor claims it­self.

4 In cases in­volving the vic­tim, the court may firstly de­cide solely on guilt and the pen­alty; there­after the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall, fol­low­ing a fur­ther hear­ing of the parties, rule as a judge sit­ting alone on the civil claim, ir­re­spect­ive of its amount.

Chapter 4 Legal Agents

Section 1 Principles

Art. 127

1 The ac­cused, the private claimant and the oth­er per­sons in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings may ap­point a leg­al agent to safe­guard their in­terests.

2 The parties may ap­point two or more per­sons as leg­al agent provided this does not un­reas­on­ably delay the pro­ceed­ings. In such a case, they must des­ig­nate one agent as the prin­cip­al agent, who is au­thor­ised to carry out acts of rep­res­ent­a­tion be­fore the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies and whose dom­i­cile is deemed to be the sole ad­dress for ser­vice.

3 The leg­al agent may act for two or more per­sons in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings, sub­ject to the re­stric­tions laid down by law and in their pro­fes­sion­al code of prac­tice.

4 The parties may ap­point any per­son who has the ca­pa­city to act, is of un­blem­ished repu­ta­tion and is trust­worthy; the re­stric­tions of the law gov­ern­ing the leg­al pro­fes­sion are re­served.

5 The de­fence of the ac­cused is re­served to law­yers who are au­thor­ised un­der the Law­yers Act of 23 June 200041 to rep­res­ent parties in court; the fore­go­ing is sub­ject to derog­at­ing can­ton­al pro­vi­sions on the de­fence in pro­ceed­ings re­lat­ing to con­tra­ven­tions.

Section 2 Defence Lawyers

Art. 128 Status

A de­fence law­yer is ob­liged to act solely in the in­terests the ac­cused, sub­ject to the re­stric­tions laid down by law and in the pro­fes­sion­al code of prac­tice.

Art. 129 Right to choose a defence lawyer

1 The ac­cused is en­titled, in any crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings and at any stage of the pro­ceed­ings either to in­struct a leg­al agent as defined in Art­icle 127 para­graph 5 to con­duct his or her de­fence (right to choose a de­fence law­yer) or, sub­ject to Art­icle 130, to con­duct his or her own de­fence.

2 The ac­cused ex­er­cises his or her right to choose a de­fence law­yer by ex­ecut­ing a writ­ten power of at­tor­ney or mak­ing a de­clar­a­tion on re­cord.

Art. 130 Mandatory appointment of a defence lawyer

A de­fence law­yer must be ap­poin­ted to rep­res­ent the ac­cused if:

a.
the peri­od on re­mand in­clud­ing the peri­od when un­der ar­rest has con­tin­ued for more than 10 days;
b.42
the of­fence con­cerned car­ries a cus­todi­al sen­tence of more than a year or a cus­todi­al meas­ure or may res­ult in ex­pul­sion from Switzer­land;
c.
the ac­cused is un­able to safe­guard his or her in­terests in the pro­ceed­ings ad­equately due to his or her phys­ic­al or men­tal con­di­tion or for oth­er reas­ons, and his or her stat­utory rep­res­ent­at­ive is un­able to do so either;
d.
the pro­sec­ut­ing law­yer is ap­pear­ing in per­son be­fore the court of first in­stance or the court of ap­peal;
e.
ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings (Art. 358–362) are be­ing con­duc­ted.

42 Amended by An­nex No 5 of the FA of 20 March 2015 (Im­ple­ment­a­tion of Art. 121 para. 3–6 Fed­er­al Con­sti­tu­tion on the ex­pul­sion of for­eign na­tion­als con­victed of cer­tain crim­in­al of­fences), in force since 1 Oct. 2016 (AS 2016 2329; BBl 2013 5975).

Art. 131 Appointment of the mandatory defence lawyer

1 Where the man­dat­ory ap­point­ment of a de­fence law­yer is re­quired, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall en­sure that a de­fence law­yer is ap­poin­ted im­me­di­ately.

2 If the re­quire­ments for the man­dat­ory ap­point­ment of a de­fence law­yer are ful­filled on com­mence­ment of the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings, the de­fence law­yer must be ap­poin­ted fol­low­ing the first in­ter­view by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, or be­fore open­ing the in­vest­ig­a­tion at the latest.

3 In cases where the ap­point­ment of a man­dat­ory de­fence law­yer is clearly re­quired but evid­ence is ob­tained be­fore a de­fence law­yer is ap­poin­ted, the evid­ence ob­tained is only ad­miss­ible if the ac­cused waives the right to have the evid­ence taken again.

Art. 132 Duty defence lawyer

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall ap­point a duty de­fence law­yer if:

a.
in the event of man­dat­ory ap­point­ment of a de­fence law­yer:
1.
the ac­cused, des­pite be­ing re­ques­ted to do so by the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings, fails to ap­point a de­fence law­yer of choice, or
2.
the de­fence law­yer of choice has been dis­missed or has resigned and the ac­cused fails to ap­point a new de­fence law­yer of choice with­in the time lim­it set;
b.
the ac­cused lacks the ne­ces­sary fin­an­cial means and re­quires a de­fence law­yer to safe­guard of his or her in­terests.

2 A de­fence law­yer is re­quired to safe­guard the in­terests of the ac­cused in par­tic­u­lar if the mat­ter is not a minor case and the case in­volves fac­tu­al or leg­al is­sues that the ac­cused is not qual­i­fied to deal with alone.

3 A case is no longer re­garded as minor if it is prob­able that a cus­todi­al sen­tence of more than 4 months or a mon­et­ary pen­alty of more than 120 daily pen­alty units may be im­posed on con­vic­tion.43

43 Amended by An­nex No 3 of the FA of 19 June 2015 (Amend­ments to the Law of Crim­in­al Sanc­tions), in force since 1 Jan. 2018 (AS 2016 1249; BBl 2012 4721).

Art. 133 Appointment of the duty defence lawyer

1 The duty de­fence law­yer is ap­poin­ted by the per­son act­ing as dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings at the rel­ev­ant stage of the pro­ceed­ings.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall if pos­sible take ac­count of the wishes of the ac­cused when ap­point­ing the duty de­fence law­yer.

Art. 134 Dismissal and change of duty defence lawyer

1 If there is no longer any reas­on to have a duty de­fence law­yer, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall dis­miss the law­yer.

2 If the mu­tu­al trust between the ac­cused and his or her duty de­fence law­yer is ser­i­ously com­prom­ised or the pro­vi­sion of an ef­fect­ive de­fence is no longer guar­an­teed for oth­er reas­ons, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall ap­point an­oth­er per­son as the duty de­fence law­yer.

Art. 135 Duty defence lawyer's fees

1 The duty de­fence law­yer shall be paid in ac­cord­ance with the table of leg­al fees ap­plic­able in the Con­fed­er­a­tion or in the can­ton in which the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings were con­duc­ted.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court passing judg­ment shall de­term­ine the fees at the end of the pro­ceed­ings.

3 The duty de­fence law­yer may file an ob­jec­tion against the de­cision on fees:

a.
with the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity, where the de­cision was made by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court of first in­stance; or
b.
with the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Court, where the de­cision was made by the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity or the can­ton­al court of ap­peal.

4 If the ac­cused is ordered to pay pro­ced­ur­al costs, as soon as his or her fin­an­cial cir­cum­stances per­mit, he or she must:

a.
re­pay the fees to the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton;
b.
pay the de­fence law­yer the dif­fer­ence between the of­fi­cial fees and the full fees.

5 The rights of the Con­fed­er­a­tion or of the can­ton are sub­ject to a time lim­it of 10 years from the time when the de­cision be­comes leg­ally bind­ing.

Section 3 Legal Aid for the Private Claimant

Art. 136 Requirements

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall grant the private claimant full or par­tial leg­al aid for the en­force­ment of their civil claims if:

a.
the private claimant does not have the re­quired fin­an­cial re­sources; and
b.
the civil pro­ceed­ings does not ap­pear to be without any pro­spect of suc­cess.

2 Leg­al aid in­cludes:

a.
re­lief from the re­quire­ment to make an ad­vance pay­ment or to provide se­cur­ity in re­spect of costs;
b.
re­lief from the re­quire­ment to pay pro­ced­ur­al costs;
c.
the ap­point­ment of a leg­al rep­res­ent­at­ive if this is ne­ces­sary to safe­guard the rights of the private claimant.

Art. 137 Appointment, dismissal and change

The ap­point­ment, dis­missal and change of the leg­al rep­res­ent­at­ive are gov­erned by Art­icles 133 and 134 mu­tatis mutandis.

Art. 138 Fees and allocation of costs

1 The leg­al rep­res­ent­at­ive's fees are gov­erned by Art­icle 135 mu­tatis mutandis; the fi­nal judg­ment on who must pay the costs of the leg­al rep­res­ent­at­ive and of any pro­ced­ur­al acts in re­spect of which re­lief has been gran­ted from mak­ing an ad­vance pay­ment to cov­er costs re­mains re­served.

2 If the private claimant is awar­ded pro­ced­ur­al and leg­al costs to be paid by the ac­cused, the por­tion of these costs covered by leg­al aid must be re­fun­ded to the Con­fed­er­a­tion or to the can­ton.

Title 4 Evidence

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Section 1 Taking Evidence and Admissibility of Evidence

Art. 139 Principles

1 In or­der to es­tab­lish the truth, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall use all the leg­ally ad­miss­ible evid­ence that is rel­ev­ant in ac­cord­ance with the latest sci­entif­ic find­ings and ex­per­i­ence.

2 No evid­ence shall be led on mat­ters that are ir­rel­ev­ant, ob­vi­ous, known to the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity or already ad­equately proven in law.

Art. 140 Prohibited methods of taking evidence

1 The use of co­er­cion, vi­ol­ence, threats, prom­ises, de­cep­tion and meth­ods that may com­prom­ise the abil­ity of the per­son con­cerned to think or de­cide freely are pro­hib­ited when tak­ing evid­ence.

2 Such meth­ods re­main un­law­ful even if the per­son con­cerned con­sents to their use.

Art. 141 Admissibility of unlawfully obtained evidence

1 Evid­ence ob­tained in vi­ol­a­tion of Art­icle 140 is not ad­miss­ible un­der any cir­cum­stances. The fore­go­ing also ap­plies where this Code de­clares evid­ence to be in­ad­miss­ible.

2 Evid­ence that crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies have ob­tained by crim­in­al meth­ods or by vi­ol­at­ing reg­u­la­tions on ad­miss­ib­il­ity is in­ad­miss­ible un­less it is es­sen­tial that it be ad­mit­ted in or­der to se­cure a con­vic­tion for a ser­i­ous of­fence.

3 Evid­ence that has been ob­tained in vi­ol­a­tion of ad­min­is­trat­ive reg­u­la­tions is ad­miss­ible.

4 Where evid­ence that is in­ad­miss­ible un­der para­graph 2 has made it pos­sible to ob­tain ad­di­tion­al evid­ence, such evid­ence is not ad­miss­ible if it would have been im­possible to ob­tain had the pre­vi­ous evid­ence not been ob­tained.

5 Re­cords re­lat­ing to in­ad­miss­ible evid­ence shall be re­moved from the case doc­u­ments, held in safe­keep­ing un­til a fi­nal judg­ment has con­cluded the pro­ceed­ings, and then des­troyed.

Section 2 Examination Hearings

Art. 142 Criminal justice authority conducting the examination hearing

1 Ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings are con­duc­ted by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions and the courts. The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall de­cide on the ex­tent to which the em­ploy­ees of these au­thor­it­ies are per­mit­ted to con­duct ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings.

2 The po­lice may ques­tion ac­cused per­sons and per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion. The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may de­term­ine which po­lice of­ficers may ques­tion wit­nesses on be­half of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

Art. 143 Conduct of the examination hearing

1 At the start of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing, the per­son be­ing ques­tioned shall, in a lan­guage they can un­der­stand:

a.
be asked for his or her per­son­al de­tails;
b.
be ad­vised of the sub­ject mat­ter of the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings and of the ca­pa­city in which he or she is be­ing in­ter­viewed;
c.
be in­formed in full of his or her rights and ob­lig­a­tions.

2 A note must be made in the re­cord that the pro­vi­sions of para­graph 1 have been com­plied with.

3 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity may make fur­ther en­quir­ies in re­la­tion to the iden­tity of the per­son be­ing ques­tioned.

4 It shall in­vite the per­son be­ing ques­tioned to com­ment on the sub­ject mat­ter of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing.

5 It shall en­deav­our by means of clearly for­mu­lated ques­tions and con­ten­tions to ob­tain com­pre­hens­ive state­ments and to cla­ri­fy any con­tra­dic­tions.

6 The per­son be­ing ques­tioned shall make his or her state­ment on the basis of his or her re­col­lec­tions. He or she may make use of writ­ten doc­u­ments with the con­sent of the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings; these doc­u­ments shall be ad­ded to the case doc­u­ments on con­clu­sion of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing.

7 Per­sons with speech or hear­ing dif­fi­culties shall be ques­tioned in writ­ing or with the as­sist­ance of a suit­ably qual­i­fied per­son.

Art. 144 Examination hearing by video conference

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the courts may con­duct an ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing by video con­fer­ence if a per­son­al ap­pear­ance by the per­son be­ing ques­tioned is not pos­sible or is only pos­sible with un­reas­on­able trouble and ex­pense.

2 An au­dio and video re­cord­ing shall be made of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing.

Art. 145 Written reports

The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity may in­vite a per­son be­ing ques­tioned to provide a writ­ten re­port in­stead of or in ad­di­tion to hold­ing an ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing.

Art. 146 Examination of two or more persons and confrontation hearings

1 The per­sons be­ing ques­tioned shall be ques­tioned sep­ar­ately.

2 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies may ar­range for per­sons, in­clud­ing those who have the right to re­fuse to give evid­ence, to con­front each oth­er. The spe­cial rights of the vic­tim are re­served.

3 They may re­quire per­sons who have been ques­tioned who will prob­ably be re­quired to con­front oth­er per­sons after the con­clu­sion of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing to re­main at the place of the pro­ceed­ings un­til the con­front­a­tion hear­ing is held.

4 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may tem­por­ar­ily ex­clude a per­son from the hear­ing if:

a.
there is a con­flict of in­terest; or
b.
the per­son must still be ques­tioned in the pro­ceed­ings as a wit­ness, a per­son provid­ing in­form­a­tion or as an ex­pert wit­ness.

Section 3 Rights to Participate in the Taking of Evidence

Art. 147 General provisions

1 Parties have the right to be present when the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the courts are tak­ing evid­ence and to put ques­tions to per­sons who have been ques­tioned. The pres­ence of the de­fence law­yer at ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings con­duc­ted by the po­lice is gov­erned by Art­icle 159.

2 Per­sons ex­er­cising a right to par­ti­cip­ate do not have the right to re­quest that the tak­ing of evid­ence be post­poned.

3 A party or his or her leg­al agent may re­quest that evid­ence be taken again if the leg­al agent or the party without a leg­al agent is pre­ven­ted from par­ti­cip­at­ing for good cause. Evid­ence need not be taken again if it would in­volve un­reas­on­able trouble and ex­pense and the right of the party to be heard, and in par­tic­u­lar the right to ask ques­tions, can be taken in­to ac­count in an­oth­er way.

4 Evid­ence ob­tained in vi­ol­a­tion of this Art­icle is in­ad­miss­ible against a party who was not present when it was taken.

Art. 148 In mutual assistance proceedings

1 If evid­ence is taken abroad in ex­e­cu­tion of a re­quest for mu­tu­al as­sist­ance, the right of the parties to par­ti­cip­ate is sat­is­fied if they:

a.
are per­mit­ted to sub­mit ques­tions to be asked by the re­ques­ted for­eign au­thor­ity;
b.
are per­mit­ted to in­spect the re­cord once the re­quest for mu­tu­al as­sist­ance has been ex­ecuted; and
c.
are per­mit­ted to sub­mit writ­ten sup­ple­ment­ary ques­tions.

2 Art­icle 147 para­graph 4 ap­plies.

Section 4 Protective Measures

Art. 149 General provisions

1 If there are grounds to as­sume that a wit­ness, a per­son provid­ing in­form­a­tion, an ac­cused per­son, an ex­pert wit­ness or a trans­lat­or or in­ter­pret­er, or a per­son re­lated to him or her in terms of Art­icle 168 para­graphs 1–3 could be ex­posed to a ser­i­ous danger to life and limb or any oth­er ser­i­ous pre­ju­dice by par­ti­cip­at­ing in the pro­ceed­ings, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall take the ap­pro­pri­ate pro­tect­ive meas­ures in re­sponse to an ap­plic­a­tion or ex of­fi­cio.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may also suit­ably re­strict the pro­ced­ur­al rights of the parties, in par­tic­u­lar by:

a.
en­sur­ing an­onym­ity;
b.
con­duct­ing ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings while ex­clud­ing parties or the pub­lic;
c.
es­tab­lish­ing per­son­al de­tails while ex­clud­ing parties or the pub­lic;
d.
modi­fy­ing the ap­pear­ance or voice of the per­son re­quir­ing pro­tec­tion or screen­ing the per­son from the court;
e.
lim­it­ing rights to in­spect case doc­u­ments.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may per­mit the per­son re­quir­ing pro­tec­tion to be ac­com­pan­ied by a leg­al agent or a con­fid­ant.

4 If a per­son un­der the age of 18 is in­ter­viewed as a wit­ness or per­son provid­ing in­form­a­tion, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may or­der fur­ther pro­tect­ive meas­ures in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 154 para­graphs 2 and 4.

5 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall en­sure in the case of all pro­tect­ive meas­ures that the right of the parties to be heard is re­spec­ted and in par­tic­u­lar that the ac­cused's rights to a prop­er de­fence are re­spec­ted.

6 If the per­son re­quir­ing pro­tec­tion has been as­sured that his or her an­onym­ity will be pre­served, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall take ap­pro­pri­ate meas­ures to pre­vent any con­fu­sion or mis­taken iden­tity.

Art. 150 Assurance of anonymity

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may give an as­sur­ance to the per­son re­quir­ing pro­tec­tion that his or her an­onym­ity will be pre­served.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall sub­mit its as­sur­ance to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court with­in 30 days for ap­prov­al; in do­ing so, it must spe­cify all the de­tails re­quired to as­sess the leg­al­ity of the meas­ure. The de­cision of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court is fi­nal.

3 If the com­puls­ory meas­ures court de­clines to ap­prove the meas­ure, any evid­ence already ob­tained sub­ject to the as­sur­ance of an­onym­ity shall be in­ad­miss­ible.

4 An as­sur­ance of an­onym­ity that has been ap­proved or gran­ted is bind­ing on all crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies in­volved in the case.

5 The per­son re­quir­ing pro­tec­tion may waive the re­quire­ment of an­onym­ity at any time.

6 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings in the court shall re­voke the as­sur­ance if there is clearly no longer a need for pro­tec­tion.

Art. 151 Measures to protect undercover investigators

1 Un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­ors who have been giv­en an as­sur­ance that their an­onym­ity will be pre­served have the fol­low­ing rights:

a.
to have their true iden­tity with­held throughout the en­tire pro­ceed­ings and after their con­clu­sion from every­one oth­er than the judges of the courts hear­ing the case;
b.
to have no de­tails as to their true iden­tity re­cor­ded in the case doc­u­ments.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall take the re­quired pro­tect­ive meas­ures.

Art. 152 General measures to protect victims

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall safe­guard the per­son­al pri­vacy of the vic­tim at every stage of the pro­ceed­ings.

2 The vic­tim may be ac­com­pan­ied at all pro­ced­ur­al hear­ings by a con­fid­ant in ad­di­tion to his or her leg­al agent.

3 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall en­sure that the vic­tim does not en­counter the ac­cused if the vic­tim so re­quests. In such a case, they shall take ac­count of the ac­cused's right to be heard in some oth­er way. In par­tic­u­lar, they may ques­tion the vic­tim while ap­ply­ing pro­tect­ive meas­ures in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 149 para­graph 2 let­ters b and d.

4 A con­front­a­tion hear­ing may be ordered if:

a.
the ac­cused's right to be heard can­not be guar­an­teed in any oth­er way; or
b.
the hear­ing is es­sen­tial for the pur­pose of the pro­sec­u­tion.

Art. 153 Special measures to protect of victims sexual offences

1 Vic­tims of sexu­al of­fences may ask to be ques­tioned by a per­son of the same sex.

2 A con­front­a­tion hear­ing with the ac­cused may be ordered against the wishes of the vic­tim only if the ac­cused's right to be heard can­not be guar­an­teed in any oth­er way.

Art. 154 Special measures to protect child victims

1 A vic­tim is a child with­in the mean­ing of this Art­icle if he or she is un­der 18 years of age at the time of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing or con­front­a­tion hear­ing.

2 The first ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing with the child must take place as quickly as pos­sible.

3 The au­thor­ity may ex­clude the con­fid­ant from the pro­ceed­ings if this per­son could ex­ert a de­cis­ive in­flu­ence on the child.

4 If it is evid­ent that the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing or the con­front­a­tion hear­ing could be a ser­i­ous psy­cho­lo­gic­al bur­den for the child, the fol­low­ing rules ap­ply:

a.
A con­front­a­tion hear­ing with the ac­cused may be ordered only if the child ex­pressly re­quests the con­front­a­tion hear­ing or the ac­cused's right to be heard can­not be guar­an­teed in any oth­er way.
b.
The child may not nor­mally be in­ter­viewed more than twice dur­ing the en­tire pro­ceed­ings.
c.
A second in­ter­view shall take place only if parties were un­able to ex­er­cise their rights at the first in­ter­view or the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing is es­sen­tial in the in­terests of the en­quir­ies or of the child. If pos­sible, the child should be ques­tioned by the same per­son who con­duc­ted the first in­ter­view.
d.
Ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings shall be con­duc­ted in the pres­ence of a spe­cial­ist by an in­vest­ig­at­ing of­ficer spe­cific­ally trained for this pur­pose. Un­less a con­front­a­tion hear­ing is held, au­dio and video re­cord­ings shall be made of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing.
e.
The parties shall ex­er­cise their rights through the per­son ask­ing the ques­tions.
f.
The per­son ask­ing the ques­tions and the spe­cial­ist shall re­cord their spe­cial ob­ser­va­tions in a re­port.

Art. 155 Measures to protect persons with mental disorders

1 Ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings with per­sons with men­tal dis­orders shall be lim­ited to es­sen­tial mat­ters; ad­di­tion­al ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings shall be avoided.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may ar­range for spe­cial­ist crim­in­al or so­cial ser­vices au­thor­it­ies to con­duct the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing or re­quest that fam­ily mem­bers, oth­er con­fid­ants or ex­pert wit­nesses at­tend the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing.

Art. 156 Measures to protect persons outside the proceedings

The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may take meas­ures to pro­tect per­sons out­side the pro­ceed­ings.

Chapter 2 Examination Hearings with the Accused

Art. 157 Principle

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies may ques­tion the ac­cused at any stage of the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings in re­la­tion to the of­fences of which he or she is ac­cused.

2 In do­ing so, they shall give the ac­cused the op­por­tun­ity to make a com­pre­hens­ive state­ment in re­la­tion to these of­fences.

Art. 158 Caution administered at the first interview

1 At the start of the first in­ter­view, the po­lice or pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall ad­vise the ac­cused in a lan­guage that he or she un­der­stands:

a.
that pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings have been com­menced against him or her, and of the of­fences that are the sub­ject of the pro­ceed­ings;
b.
that he or she is en­titled to re­main si­lent and may re­fuse to co­oper­ate in the pro­ceed­ings;
c.
that he or she is en­titled to ap­point a de­fence law­yer or if ap­pro­pri­ate to re­quest the as­sist­ance of a duty de­fence law­yer;
d.
that he or she may re­quest the as­sist­ance of an in­ter­pret­er.

2 Evid­ence ob­tained at an ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing con­duc­ted without the fore­go­ing cau­tion is in­ad­miss­ible.

Art. 159 Police examination hearings during enquiries

1 In the case of po­lice ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings, the ac­cused has the right for his or her de­fence law­yer to be present and al­lowed to ask ques­tions.

2 In the case of po­lice ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings of a per­son who has been ar­res­ted, the per­son also is en­titled to com­mu­nic­ate freely with his or her de­fence law­yer.

3 The ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing may not be post­poned to al­low time for the fore­go­ing rights to be ex­er­cised.

Art. 160 Examination hearing with an accused who has admitted the offence

If the ac­cused has ad­mit­ted com­mit­ting the of­fence, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and court shall as­sess the cred­ib­il­ity of the ad­mis­sion and re­quest the ac­cused to provide more pre­cise de­tails of the cir­cum­stances of the of­fence.

Art. 161 Investigation of personal circumstances at the preliminary proceedings stage

The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall ques­tion the ac­cused with re­gard to his or her per­son­al cir­cum­stances only if it is ex­pec­ted that the ac­cused will be charged or is­sued with a sum­mary pen­alty or­der or if it is es­sen­tial for oth­er reas­ons.

Chapter 3 Witnesses

Section 1 General Provisions

Art. 162 Definition

A wit­ness is a per­son not in­volved in com­mit­ting an of­fence who can make a state­ment that may as­sist in the in­vest­ig­a­tion of an of­fence and who is not a per­son provid­ing in­form­a­tion.

Art. 163 Capacity and duty to testify

1 A per­son has the ca­pa­city to testi­fy if he or she is over the age of 15 and has the re­quired men­tal ca­pa­city with re­gard to the sub­ject mat­ter of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing.

2 Every per­son with the ca­pa­city to testi­fy is ob­liged to make a state­ment and to tell the truth, sub­ject to the pro­vi­sions on rights to re­fuse to testi­fy.

Art. 164 Enquiries relating to witnesses

1 En­quir­ies may be made in­to the pre­vi­ous con­duct and the per­son­al cir­cum­stances of a wit­ness only if this is rel­ev­ant to an as­sess­ment of his or her cred­ib­il­ity.

2 If there are doubts as to the men­tal ca­pa­city of a wit­ness or if there are in­dic­a­tions of a men­tal dis­order, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may or­der an out­pa­tient ex­am­in­a­tion of the wit­ness if this is jus­ti­fied by the im­port­ance of the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings and of the wit­nesses testi­mony.

Art. 165 Witness's duty of confidentiality

1 The au­thor­ity con­duct­ing the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing may re­quire a wit­ness sub­ject to ad­vising him or her of the pen­al­ties un­der Art­icle 292 SCC44 to treat the planned or com­pleted in­ter­view and its sub­ject mat­ter as con­fid­en­tial.

2 This ob­lig­a­tion shall be made sub­ject to a time lim­it.

3 The or­der may be com­bined with the wit­ness's sum­mons.

Art. 166 Interview with the person suffering harm

1 The per­son suf­fer­ing harm shall be in­ter­viewed as a wit­ness.

2 The right to in­ter­view the per­son suf­fer­ing harm as a per­son provid­ing in­form­a­tion in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 178 is re­served.

Art. 167 Compensation

A wit­ness is en­titled to ap­pro­pri­ate com­pens­a­tion for loss of in­come and ex­penses.

Section 2 Rights to Refuse to Testify

Art. 168 Right to refuse to testify due to a personal relationship

1 The fol­low­ing per­sons may re­fuse to testi­fy:

a.
the ac­cused's spouse or the per­son who co­hab­its with the ac­cused;
b.
any­one who has a child with the ac­cused;
c.
any­one who is re­lated to the ac­cused in dir­ect line or by mar­riage;
d.
the ac­cused's sib­lings and stepsib­lings and the spouse of a sib­ling or stepsib­ling;
e.
the sib­lings and stepsib­lings of the ac­cused's spouse, and the spouse of such a sib­ling or stepsib­ling;
f.
the ac­cused's foster par­ents, foster chil­dren and foster sib­lings;
g.45
a per­son ap­poin­ted to act as guard­i­an or deputy for the ac­cused.

2 The right to re­fuse to testi­fy un­der para­graph 1 let­ters a and f re­mains val­id if the mar­riage is dis­solved or if in the case of a foster fam­ily46, the foster re­la­tion­ship no longer ap­plies.

3 A re­gistered part­ner­ship is deemed equi­val­ent to mar­riage.

4 The right to re­fuse to testi­fy ceases to ap­ply if:

a.47
the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings con­cern an of­fence un­der Art­icles 111–113, 122, 124, 140, 184, 185, 187, 189, 190 or 191 SCC48; and
b.
the crim­in­al act was dir­ec­ted at a per­son to whom the wit­ness in ac­cord­ance with para­graphs 1–3 is re­lated.

45Amended by An­nex No 2 of the FA of 15 Dec. 2017 (Child Pro­tec­tion), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 2947; BBl 2015 3431).

46 Art. 4–11 of the Or­din­ance of 19 Oct. 1977 on the Place­ment of Chil­dren in Foster Care and for Ad­op­tion (SR 211.222.338).

47 Amended by No III of the FA of 30 Sept. 2011, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2012 (AS 2012 2575; BBl 2010 56515677).

48 SR 311.0

Art. 169 Right to refuse to testify for personal protection or to protect closely related persons

1 A per­son may the re­fuse to testi­fy if he or she would in­crim­in­ate him or her­self by testi­fy­ing such that he or she:

a.
could be found guilty of an of­fence;
b.
could be held li­able un­der the civil law and the in­terest in pro­tec­tion out­weighs the in­terest in pro­sec­u­tion.

2 The right to re­fuse to testi­fy also ap­plies if the per­son by testi­fy­ing would in­crim­in­ate a closely re­lated per­son as defined in Art­icle 168 para­graphs 1–3; Art­icle 168 para­graph 4 re­mains re­served.

3 A per­son may re­fuse to testi­fy if by testi­fy­ing he or she or a closely re­lated per­son as defined in Art­icle 168 para­graphs 1–3 would be ex­posed to a con­sid­er­able risk to life and limb or oth­er ser­i­ous det­ri­ment that can­not be pre­ven­ted by tak­ing pro­tect­ive meas­ures.

4 A vic­tim of a sexu­al of­fence may in every case re­fuse to an­swer ques­tions that re­late to his or her private do­main.

Art. 170 Right to refuse to testify due to official secrecy

1 Pub­lic of­fi­cials as defined in Art­icle 110 para­graph 3 SCC49 as well as mem­bers of au­thor­it­ies may re­fuse to testi­fy on secret mat­ters com­mu­nic­ated to them in their of­fi­cial ca­pa­city or which have come to their know­ledge in the ex­er­cise of their of­fice.

2 They must testi­fy if they have been giv­en writ­ten au­thor­isa­tion to do so by their su­per­i­or.

3 The su­per­i­or shall grant au­thor­isa­tion to testi­fy if the in­terest in es­tab­lish­ing the truth out­weighs the in­terest in pre­serving secrecy.

Art. 171 Right to refuse to testify due to professional confidentiality

1 Mem­bers of the clergy, law­yers, de­fence law­yers, not­ar­ies, pat­ent at­tor­neys, doc­tors, dent­ists, phar­macists, psy­cho­lo­gists and as­sist­ants to such per­sons may re­fuse to testi­fy in re­la­tion to con­fid­en­tial mat­ters that have been con­fided to them or come to their know­ledge in the course of their pro­fes­sion­al work.50

2 They must testi­fy if they:

a.
are sub­ject to a duty to re­port; or
b.
are re­lieved of their duty of con­fid­en­ti­al­ity in terms of Art­icle 321 num­ber 2 SCC51 by the per­son to whom the con­fid­en­tial in­form­a­tion per­tains or through the writ­ten con­sent of the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity.

3 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall also re­spect pro­fes­sion­al con­fid­en­ti­al­ity in cases where the per­son en­trus­ted with con­fid­en­tial in­form­a­tion is re­lieved of the duty of con­fid­en­ti­al­ity but he or she es­tab­lishes that the in­terest of the per­son to whom the con­fid­en­tial in­form­a­tion per­tains out­weighs the in­terest in es­tab­lish­ing the truth.

4 The pro­vi­sions of the Law­yers Act of 23 June 200052 are re­served.

50 Amended by An­nex No 2 of the Health­care Oc­cu­pa­tions Act of 30 Sept. 2016, in force since 1 Feb. 2020 (AS 2020 57; BBl 2015 8715).

51 SR 311.0

52 SR 935.61

Art. 172 Protection of journalists' sources

1 Per­sons in­volved pro­fes­sion­ally in the pub­lic­a­tion of in­form­a­tion in the ed­it­or­i­al sec­tion of a me­di­um that ap­pears peri­od­ic­ally, to­geth­er with their aux­il­i­ary per­son­nel may re­fuse to testi­fy as to the iden­tity of the au­thor or as to the con­tent and sources of their in­form­a­tion.

2 They must testi­fy if:

a.
the testi­mony is re­quired to save a per­son from im­me­di­ate danger to life and limb;
b.
without the testi­mony one of the fol­low­ing of­fences will not be solved or a per­son sus­pec­ted of com­mit­ting such an of­fence may not be ap­pre­hen­ded:
1.
hom­icide of­fences in terms of Art­icles 111–113 SCC53,
2.
felon­ies car­ry­ing a cus­todi­al sen­tence of at least 3 years,
3.54
of­fences in terms of Art­icles 187, 189, 190, 191, 197 para­graph 4, 260ter, 260quin­quies, 260sex­ies, 305bis, 305ter and 322ter–322sep­ties SCC,
4.55
of­fences in terms of Art­icle 19 num­ber 2 of the Nar­cot­ics Act of 3 Oc­to­ber 195156.

53 SR 311.0

54 Amended by An­nex No II 3 of the FedD of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ap­prov­al and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Coun­cil of Europe Con­ven­tion on the Pre­ven­tion of Ter­ror­ism and its Ad­di­tion­al Pro­tocol and the Strength­en­ing of Crim­in­al Justice In­stru­ments for com­bat­ing Ter­ror­ism and Or­gan­ised Crime, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2021 (AS 2021 360; BBl 2018 6427).

55 Cor­rec­tion by the Fed­er­al As­sembly Draft­ing Com­mit­tee dated 19 Sept. 2014, pub­lished on 4 Oct. 2014 (AS 2011 4487).

56 SR 812.121

Art. 173 Right to refuse to testify due to other duties of confidentiality

1 Any per­son who is re­quired to pre­serve pro­fes­sion­al con­fid­en­ti­al­ity in ac­cord­ance with any of the fol­low­ing pro­vi­sions must testi­fy only if the in­terest in es­tab­lish­ing the truth out­weighs the in­terest in pre­serving con­fid­en­ti­al­ity:

a.
Art­icle 321bis SCC57;
b.
Art­icle 139 para­graph 3 of the Civil Code58;
c.
Art­icle 2 of the Fed­er­al Act of 9 Oc­to­ber 198159 on Preg­nancy Ad­vis­ory Centres;
d.60
Art­icle 11 of the Vic­tim Sup­port Act of 23 March 200761;
e.62
Art­icle 15 para­graph 2 of the Nar­cot­ics Act of 3 Oc­to­ber 195163;
f.64
Art­icle 16 let­ter f of the Health­care Oc­cu­pa­tions Act of 30 Septem­ber 201665.

2 Per­sons en­trus­ted with oth­er con­fid­en­tial in­form­a­tion pro­tec­ted by law are re­quired to testi­fy. The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may re­lieve them of the duty to testi­fy if they are able to es­tab­lish that the in­terest in pre­serving con­fid­en­ti­al­ity out­weighs the in­terest in es­tab­lish­ing the truth.

57 SR 311.0

58 SR 210. This Art. has now been re­pealed.

59 SR 857.5

60 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125).

61 SR 312.5

62 Cor­rec­tion by the Fed­er­al As­sembly Draft­ing Com­mit­tee dated 19 Sept. 2014, pub­lished on 4 Oct. 2014 (AS 2011 4487).

63 SR 812.121

64 In­ser­ted by An­nex No 2 of the Health­care Oc­cu­pa­tions Act of 30 Sept. 2016, in force since 1 Feb. 2020 (AS 2020 57; BBl 2015 8715).

65 SR 811.21

Art. 174 Decision on permitting a person to refuse to testify

1 The de­cision on wheth­er to al­low a per­son to re­fuse to testi­fy is made by:

a.
the au­thor­ity con­duct­ing the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing in the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings;
b.
the court after charges have been brought.

2 The wit­ness may re­quest a re­view by the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity im­me­di­ately after re­ceiv­ing no­ti­fic­a­tion of the de­cision.

3 Un­til the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity makes its de­cision, the wit­ness is en­titled to re­fuse to testi­fy.

Art. 175 Exercise of the right to refuse to testify

1 The wit­ness may in­voke his or her right to re­fuse to testi­fy at any time or re­voke his or her waiver of that right.

2 State­ments made by a wit­ness after be­ing cau­tioned with re­gard to the right to re­fuse to testi­fy may be ad­mit­ted as evid­ence if the wit­ness sub­sequently ex­er­cises the right to re­fuse to testi­fy or re­vokes a waiver of the right to re­fuse to testi­fy.

Art. 176 Unlawful refusal to testify

1 Any per­son who re­fuses to testi­fy without hav­ing the right to do so may be li­able to a fixed pen­alty fine and may be re­quired to pay the costs and dam­ages in­curred as a res­ult of such re­fus­al.

2 If a per­son who is ob­liged to testi­fy in­sists on re­fus­ing to do so, he or she will again be re­ques­ted to testi­fy and cau­tioned as to the pen­al­ties un­der Art­icle 292 SCC66. In the event of con­tin­ued re­fus­al, crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings shall be com­menced.

Section 3 Examination Hearings with Witnesses

Art. 177

1 The au­thor­ity con­duct­ing the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing shall cau­tion the wit­ness at the be­gin­ning of each hear­ing with re­gard to the ob­lig­a­tions to testi­fy and to tell the truth and ad­vise the wit­ness of the pen­al­ties for per­jury in terms of Art­icle 307 SCC67. If no cau­tion is giv­en, the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing is in­val­id.

2 The au­thor­ity con­duct­ing the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing shall ques­tion each wit­ness at the be­gin­ning of the first hear­ing as to his or her re­la­tion­ship with the parties and as to oth­er cir­cum­stances that may be rel­ev­ant to the wit­ness's cred­ib­il­ity.

3 It shall cau­tion the wit­ness as to the rights to re­fuse to testi­fy as soon as it be­comes ap­par­ent through ques­tion­ing or the files that such rights ap­ply. If no cau­tion is giv­en and the wit­ness sub­sequently ex­er­cises the right to re­fuse to testi­fy, the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing is in­ad­miss­ible.

Chapter 4 Persons providing Information

Art. 178 Definition

The fol­low­ing per­sons may be in­ter­viewed as per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion:

a.
a per­son who has giv­en no­tice that he or she is a private claimant;
b.
a per­son who is un­der the age of 15 at the time of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing;
c.
a per­son who due to lim­ited men­tal ca­pa­city is not able to un­der­stand the sub­ject mat­ter of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing;
d.
a per­son who is not an ac­cused but who can­not be ex­cluded as the per­pet­rat­or of or as a par­ti­cipant in the of­fence un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion or an­oth­er re­lated of­fence;
e.
a per­son who is a co-ac­cused who must be in­ter­viewed with re­gard to an of­fence of which he or she is not per­son­ally ac­cused;
f.
a per­son who is the ac­cused in oth­er pro­ceed­ings re­lat­ing to an of­fence con­nec­ted with the of­fence un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion;
g.
a per­son who has been or could be des­ig­nated as the rep­res­ent­at­ive of a cor­por­ate en­tity in crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings against that en­tity, as well as his or her em­ploy­ees.

Art. 179 Persons providing information at police examination hearings

1 The po­lice shall ques­tion any per­son who is not a sus­pect in the ca­pa­city of a per­son provid­ing in­form­a­tion.

2 The fore­go­ing is sub­ject to the right to ques­tion a per­son as a wit­ness in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 142 para­graph 2.

Art. 180 Status

1 Per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion in terms of Art­icle 178 let­ters b–g have the right to re­main si­lent; they are sub­ject to the pro­vi­sions on ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings with the ac­cused, mu­tatis mutandis.

2 A private claimant (Art. 178 let. a) is ob­liged to testi­fy be­fore the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, be­fore the courts and be­fore the po­lice if they in­ter­view the claimant on be­half of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor. In ad­di­tion, the pro­vi­sions on wit­nesses ap­ply mu­tatis mutandis, with ex­cep­tion of Art­icle 176.

Art. 181 Examination hearing

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall cau­tion per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion at the be­gin­ning of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing with re­gard to their ob­lig­a­tion to testi­fy or their right to re­main si­lent or right to re­fuse to testi­fy.

2 They shall cau­tion per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion who are ob­liged to testi­fy or who de­clare that they are pre­pared to testi­fy with re­gard to the pos­sible pen­al­ties for false ac­cus­a­tion, of mis­lead­ing ju­di­cial au­thor­it­ies and of as­sist­ing of­fend­ers.

Chapter 5 Authorised Experts

Art. 182 Requirements for requesting the services of an expert witness

The pub­lic pro­sec­utor and courts shall re­quest the ser­vices of one or more ex­pert wit­nesses if they do not have the spe­cial­ist know­ledge and skills re­quired to de­term­ine or as­sess the facts of the case.

Art. 183 Requirements for the expert witness

1 Any nat­ur­al per­son with the re­quired spe­cial­ist know­ledge and skills in the rel­ev­ant field may be ap­poin­ted as an ex­pert wit­ness.

2 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may provide for the re­ten­tion of per­man­ent or of­fi­cial ex­pert wit­nesses for spe­cif­ic fields.

3 Au­thor­ised ex­perts are sub­ject to the grounds for re­cus­al in terms of Art­icle 56.

Art. 184 Appointment and instructions

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall ap­point the ex­pert wit­ness.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall provide writ­ten in­struc­tions; these shall con­tain:

a.
the per­son­al de­tails of the ex­pert wit­ness;
b.
if ap­plic­able, no­tice that the ex­pert wit­ness may in­struct oth­ers to as­sist in pre­par­ing the re­port sub­ject to his or her su­per­vi­sion;
c.
the pre­cisely for­mu­lated ques­tions;
d.
the dead­line for com­plet­ing the re­port;
e.
ref­er­ence to the duty of con­fid­en­ti­al­ity that ap­plies to the ex­pert wit­ness and any as­sist­ants;
f.
a ref­er­ence to the pen­al­ties for per­jury by an ex­pert wit­ness in terms of Art­icle 307 SCC68.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall give the parties pri­or op­por­tun­ity to com­ment on the ex­pert wit­ness and on the ques­tions and to sub­mit their own ap­plic­a­tions. The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may dis­pense with this re­quire­ment in re­la­tion to labor­at­ory tests, in par­tic­u­lar where they re­late to de­term­in­ing the blood-al­co­hol con­cen­tra­tion or the level of pur­ity of sub­stances, proof of the pres­ence of nar­cot­ics in the blood or the pre­par­a­tion of a DNA pro­file.

4 To­geth­er with the in­struc­tions, they shall provide the ex­pert wit­ness with the doc­u­ments and items re­quired to pre­pare the re­port.

5 They may re­voke their in­struc­tions at any time and ap­point new ex­pert wit­nesses if this is in the in­terests of the crim­in­al case.

6 They may re­quest an es­tim­ate of the costs be­fore is­su­ing the in­struc­tions.

7 If a private claimant re­quests an ex­pert re­port, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may make in­struct­ing an ex­pert wit­ness de­pend­ent on the private claimant mak­ing an ad­vance pay­ment to cov­er costs.

Art. 185 Preparation of the report

1 The ex­pert wit­ness is per­son­ally re­spons­ible for the ex­pert re­port.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may re­quest the ex­pert wit­ness to at­tend pro­ced­ur­al hear­ings and au­thor­ise the ex­pert to put ques­tions to the per­son be­ing ques­tioned.

3 If the ex­pert wit­ness is of the view that doc­u­ments must be ad­ded to the case files, he or she shall make the rel­ev­ant ap­plic­a­tion to the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings.

4 The ex­pert wit­ness may con­duct simple en­quir­ies that are closely con­nec­ted to his or her as­sign­ment and for this pur­pose may re­quest per­sons to co­oper­ate. These per­sons must com­ply with the in­struc­tions. If they re­fuse, they may be brought be­fore the ex­pert wit­ness by the po­lice.

5 In re­la­tion to en­quir­ies by the ex­pert wit­ness, the ac­cused and, to the ex­tent of their right to re­fuse to testi­fy, per­sons who have the right to re­main si­lent or to re­fuse to testi­fy may re­fuse to co­oper­ate. The ex­pert wit­ness shall cau­tion the per­sons con­cerned with re­gard to such rights at the start of his or her en­quir­ies.

Art. 186 In-patient assessment

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor or courts may have an ac­cused ad­mit­ted to hos­pit­al if this is re­quired in or­der to pre­pare a med­ic­al re­port.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall ap­ply to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court for the ac­cused to be ad­mit­ted to hos­pit­al un­less the ac­cused is already on re­mand. The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall is­sue a fi­nal judg­ment on the mat­ter in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings.

3 If an in-pa­tient as­sess­ment proves ne­ces­sary dur­ing the court pro­ceed­ings, the court con­cerned shall is­sue a fi­nal de­cision on the mat­ter in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings.

4 The time spent in hos­pit­al shall be taken in­to ac­count in the sen­tence.

5 In ad­di­tion, the in-pa­tient as­sess­ment is gov­erned by mu­tatis mutandis by the reg­u­la­tions on re­mand and pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion.

Art. 187 Form of the expert report

1 The ex­pert wit­ness shall pre­pare an ex­pert re­port in writ­ing. If ad­di­tion­al per­sons are in­volved in the pre­par­a­tion of the re­port, their names and the con­tri­bu­tion that they made to the pre­par­a­tion of the re­port must be spe­cified.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may or­der the ex­pert re­port to be giv­en or­ally or that a writ­ten re­port be ex­plained or ad­ded to or­ally; in such an event, the reg­u­la­tions on wit­ness ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings ap­ply.

Art. 188 Right of the parties to comment

The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall no­ti­fy the parties of the con­tent of the writ­ten ex­pert re­port and al­low them time in which to com­ment there­on.

Art. 189 Additions and improvements to the report

The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall ex of­fi­cio or at the re­quest of a party ar­range for the ex­pert re­port to be ad­ded to or im­proved by the same ex­pert wit­ness or shall ap­point ad­di­tion­al ex­pert wit­nesses if:

a.
the ex­pert re­port is in­com­plete or un­clear;
b.
two or more ex­pert wit­nesses di­verge con­sid­er­ably in their con­clu­sions; or
c.
there are doubts as to the ac­cur­acy of the ex­pert re­port.

Art. 190 Fees

The ex­pert wit­ness is en­titled to an ap­pro­pri­ate fee.

Art. 191 Neglect of duty

If an ex­pert wit­ness fails to ful­fil his ob­lig­a­tions or does not do so in time, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may:

a.
im­pose a fixed pen­alty fine;
b.
re­voke their in­struc­tions without pay­ing the ex­pert a fee for any work car­ried out.

Chapter 6 Material Evidence

Art. 192 Items of evidence

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall add all items of evid­ence in their ori­gin­al form to the case file.

2 Cop­ies shall be made of of­fi­cial doc­u­ments and oth­er re­cords if this is suf­fi­cient for the pur­poses of the pro­ceed­ings. If ne­ces­sary, the cop­ies must be cer­ti­fied.

3 The parties may in­spect items of evid­ence in ac­cord­ance with the reg­u­la­tions on the in­spec­tion of files.

Art. 193 Inspection

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the courts and, in minor cases, the po­lice shall make an on-site in­spec­tion of all items, loc­a­tions and pro­cesses that are im­port­ant in as­sess­ing the cir­cum­stances but which are not im­me­di­ately avail­able as items of evid­ence.

2 Every per­son con­cerned must tol­er­ate the in­spec­tion and al­low the par­ti­cipants the re­quired ac­cess.

3 If it is ne­ces­sary to enter houses, dwell­ings or oth­er premises that are not gen­er­ally ac­cess­ible, the au­thor­it­ies shall com­ply with the reg­u­la­tions ap­plic­able to the search of premises.

4 A re­cord shall be made of in­spec­tions by means of video or au­dio re­cord­ings, plans, draw­ings or de­scrip­tions, or by some oth­er meth­od.

5 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may or­der that:

a.
oth­er pro­ced­ur­al acts be re­lo­cated to the place where the in­spec­tion is be­ing car­ried out;
b.
the in­spec­tion is com­bined with a re­con­struc­tion of the crim­in­al act or with a con­front­a­tion hear­ing; in such an event, the ac­cused, the wit­nesses and the per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion are ob­liged to take part, sub­ject to their right to re­main si­lent.

Art. 194 Consultation of case files

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the courts shall con­sult files re­lat­ing to oth­er pro­ceed­ings if this is re­quired to prove the cir­cum­stances of the case or to as­sess the guilt of the ac­cused.

2 Ad­min­is­trat­ive and ju­di­cial au­thor­it­ies shall make their files avail­able for in­spec­tion un­less there is an over­rid­ing pub­lic or private in­terest in pre­serving con­fid­en­ti­al­ity.

3 Con­flicts between au­thor­it­ies of the same can­ton shall be de­cided by the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity of the can­ton con­cerned, and con­flicts between au­thor­it­ies of dif­fer­ent can­tons or between can­ton­al and fed­er­al au­thor­it­ies shall be de­cided by the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Court.

Art. 195 Obtaining reports and information

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall ob­tain of­fi­cial re­ports and med­ic­al cer­ti­fic­ates re­lat­ing to mat­ters that may be of sig­ni­fic­ance in the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings.

2 In or­der to es­tab­lish the per­son­al cir­cum­stances of the ac­cused, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and courts in­form­a­tion shall ob­tain in­form­a­tion on the ac­cused's crim­in­al re­cord and repu­ta­tion and oth­er rel­ev­ant re­ports from pub­lic of­fices and mem­bers of the pub­lic.

Title 5 Compulsory Measures

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Art. 196 Definition

Com­puls­ory meas­ures are pro­ced­ur­al acts car­ried out by the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies that re­strict the fun­da­ment­al rights of the per­sons con­cerned and which serve:

a.
to se­cure evid­ence;
b.
to en­sure that per­sons at­tend the pro­ceed­ings;
c.
to guar­an­tee the ex­e­cu­tion of the fi­nal judg­ment.

Art. 197 Principles

1 Com­puls­ory meas­ures may be taken only if:

a.
they are per­mit­ted by law;
b.
there is reas­on­able sus­pi­cion that an of­fence has been com­mit­ted;
c.
the aims can­not be achieved by less strin­gent meas­ures
d.
the ser­i­ous­ness of the of­fence jus­ti­fies the com­puls­ory meas­ure.

2 Par­tic­u­lar cau­tion must be taken when car­ry­ing out com­puls­ory meas­ures that re­strict the fun­da­ment­al rights of per­sons not ac­cused of an of­fence.

Art. 198 Competence

1 Com­puls­ory meas­ures may be ordered by:

a.
the pub­lic pro­sec­utor;
b.
the courts, or in cases of ur­gency, their dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings;
c.
the po­lice in cases spe­cific­ally provided for by law.

2 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may re­strict the powers of the po­lice to or­der or carry out com­puls­ory meas­ures to po­lice of­ficers of a spe­cif­ic rank or func­tion.

Art. 199 Notice of the order

Where a com­puls­ory meas­ure must be ordered in writ­ing and need not be kept secret, the per­sons dir­ectly con­cerned shall be giv­en a copy of the war­rant and of any re­cord re­lat­ing to its ex­e­cu­tion against con­firm­a­tion of re­ceipt.

Art. 200 Use of force

Force may be used as a last re­sort when car­ry­ing out com­puls­ory meas­ures; any force used must be reas­on­able.

Chapter 2 Summonses, Enforced Appearances and Tracing of Wanted Persons or Property

Section 1 Summonses

Art. 201 Form and content

1 A sum­mons shall be is­sued in writ­ing by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions and the courts.

2 It con­tains:

a.
the name of the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity is­su­ing the sum­mons and the per­sons who will carry out the pro­ced­ur­al act;
b.
the name of the per­son summoned and the ca­pa­city in which it is in­ten­ded that per­son should par­ti­cip­ate in the pro­ced­ur­al act;
c.
the reas­on for the sum­mons if the aim of the in­vest­ig­a­tion per­mits such in­form­a­tion to be dis­closed;
d.
the place, date and time of ap­pear­ance;
e.
no­tice of the re­quire­ment to ap­pear per­son­ally;
f.
a cau­tion as to the leg­al con­sequences of the fail­ure to ap­pear without ex­cuse;
g.
the date on which the sum­mons was is­sued;
h.
the sig­na­ture of the per­son is­su­ing the sum­mons.

Art. 202 Time limit

1 Sum­monses shall be served:

a.
in the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings: at least 3 days be­fore the pro­ced­ur­al act is due to take place;
b.
in pro­ceed­ings in court: at least 10 days be­fore the pro­ced­ur­al act is due to take place.

2 Pub­lic sum­monses shall be pub­lished at least one month be­fore the pro­ced­ur­al act is due to take place.

3 When de­cid­ing on the date of the pro­ced­ur­al act, ap­pro­pri­ate ac­count shall be taken of the avail­ab­il­ity of the per­sons be­ing summoned.

Art. 203 Exceptions

1 A sum­mons may be is­sued in a form oth­er than that pre­scribed and sub­ject to short­er time lim­its:

a.
in cases of ur­gency; or
b.
with the con­sent the per­son be­ing summoned.

2 Any per­son who is present at the place of the pro­ced­ur­al act or in de­ten­tion may be ques­tioned im­me­di­ately and without the is­sue of a sum­mons.

Art. 204 Safe conduct

1 If per­sons who are abroad must be summoned, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the per­sons con­duct­ing the court pro­ceed­ings may guar­an­tee their safe con­duct.

2 Per­sons who have been guar­an­teed safe con­duct may not be ar­res­ted or made sub­ject to oth­er meas­ures re­strict­ing their liberty in Switzer­land due to acts or con­vic­tions from the peri­od pri­or to their de­par­ture.

3 Safe con­duct may be sub­ject to con­di­tions. In this case, the per­sons con­cerned must be in­formed that the right to safe con­duct ex­pires if they fail to com­ply with the con­di­tions there­of.

Art. 205 Duty to appear, circumstances preventing appearance and failure to appear

1 Any per­son summoned by a crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity must com­ply with the sum­mons.

2 Any per­son who is pre­ven­ted from com­ply­ing with a sum­mons must in­form the au­thor­ity is­su­ing the sum­mons im­me­di­ately; he or she must give reas­ons for his or her in­ab­il­ity to ap­pear and if pos­sible provide doc­u­ment­ary evid­ence there­of.

3 A sum­mons may be re­voked if there is good cause. The re­voc­a­tion of the sum­mons takes ef­fect when the per­son summoned has been in­formed there­of.

4 Any per­son who, without an ac­cept­able reas­on, fails to com­ply with a sum­mons from a pub­lic pro­sec­utor, au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions or a court or who ap­pears late shall be li­able to a fixed pen­alty fine and may also be brought be­fore the au­thor­ity con­cerned by the po­lice.

5 The fore­go­ing para­graph does not ap­ply to the pro­vi­sions on pro­ceed­ings in ab­sen­tia.

Art. 206 Police summonses

1 In the course of po­lice en­quir­ies, the po­lice may sum­mon per­sons for the pur­poses of ques­tion­ing, es­tab­lish­ing their iden­tity or for oth­er iden­ti­fic­a­tion pro­ced­ures without the re­quire­ment to com­ply with spe­cial form­al­it­ies or time lim­its.

2 Any per­son who fails to com­ply with a po­lice sum­mons may be brought be­fore the au­thor­ity con­cerned on the basis of a war­rant is­sued by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor provided the per­son summoned has been is­sued with a writ­ten warn­ing that this meas­ure may be taken.

Section 2 Appearance enforced by the Police

Art. 207 Requirements and competence

1 A per­son may be brought be­fore an au­thor­ity by the po­lice if:

a.
he or she has failed to com­ply with a sum­mons;
b.
there are spe­cif­ic in­dic­a­tions that he or she will not com­ply with a sum­mons;
c.
in pro­ceed­ings re­lat­ing to a felony or mis­de­mean­our, his or her im­me­di­ate ap­pear­ance is es­sen­tial in the in­terests of the pro­ced­ure;
d.
there is a strong sus­pi­cion that he or she has com­mit­ted a felony or mis­de­mean­our and there is reas­on to be­lieve that there are grounds for the per­son's de­ten­tion.

2 An en­forced ap­pear­ance shall be ordered by the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 208 Form of the order

1 An en­forced ap­pear­ance is ordered in the form of a writ­ten war­rant. In cases of ur­gency, it may be ordered or­ally; it must however be con­firmed sub­sequently in writ­ing.

2 The war­rant shall con­tain the same de­tails as a sum­mons and also the ex­press au­thor­isa­tion for the po­lice to use force and to enter build­ings, dwell­ings and oth­er spaces not gen­er­ally ac­cess­ible if this is ne­ces­sary in or­der to im­ple­ment the war­rant.

Art. 209 Procedure

1 The po­lice shall make every ef­fort to pro­tect the per­sons con­cerned when ex­ecut­ing a war­rant for an en­forced ap­pear­ance.

2 They shall show the per­son con­cerned the war­rant for the en­forced ap­pear­ance and bring him or her be­fore the rel­ev­ant au­thor­ity im­me­di­ately or at the time spe­cified for the ap­pear­ance.

3 The au­thor­ity shall in­form the per­son con­cerned im­me­di­ately and in a lan­guage they can un­der­stand of the reas­on for the en­forced ap­pear­ance, carry out the pro­ced­ur­al act and re­lease the per­son im­me­di­ately there­after un­less the au­thor­ity is ap­ply­ing for his or her re­mand or pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion.

Section 3 Tracing of Wanted Persons or Property

Art. 210 Principles

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor, au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions and courts may or­der the tra­cing of per­sons whose where­abouts are un­known and who are re­quired to ap­pear in the pro­ceed­ings. In cases of ur­gency, the po­lice may them­selves or­der that a wanted per­son be traced.

2 A war­rant may be is­sued for an ac­cused per­son to be ar­res­ted and brought be­fore the au­thor­it­ies if there is a strong sus­pi­cion that he or she has com­mit­ted a felony or mis­de­mean­our and there is reas­on to be­lieve that there are grounds for the per­son's de­ten­tion.

3 Un­less the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions or the court or­ders oth­er­wise, the po­lice are re­spons­ible for tra­cing wanted per­sons.

4 Para­graphs 1 and 3 ap­ply mu­tatis mutandis to the tra­cing of prop­erty.

Art. 211 Assistance from the public

1 The pub­lic may be re­ques­ted to as­sist in tra­cing wanted per­sons or prop­erty.

2 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may is­sue pro­vi­sions in ac­cord­ance with which mem­bers of the pub­lic may be re­war­ded for as­sist­ing in the suc­cess­ful tra­cing of wanted per­sons or prop­erty.

Chapter 3 Deprivation of Liberty, Remand and Preventive Detention

Section 1 General Provisions

Art. 212 Principles

1 An ac­cused per­son shall re­main at liberty. He or she may be sub­jec­ted to com­puls­ory meas­ures in­volving depriva­tion of liberty only in ac­cord­ance with the pro­vi­sions of this Code.

2 Com­puls­ory meas­ures in­volving depriva­tion of liberty must be re­voked as soon as:

a.
their re­quire­ments are no longer ful­filled;
b.
the term of the meas­ure spe­cified by this Code or by a court has ex­pired; or
c.
al­tern­at­ive meas­ures achieve the same pur­pose.

3 Re­mand and pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion may not be of longer dur­a­tion than the an­ti­cip­ated cus­todi­al sen­tence.

Art. 213 Access to premises

1 If it is ne­ces­sary to enter houses, dwell­ings or oth­er rooms that are not gen­er­ally ac­cess­ible in or­der to stop or ar­rest a per­son, the pro­vi­sions on search­ing premises must be com­plied with.

2 If there is a risk in any delay, the po­lice may enter premises without a search war­rant.

Art. 214 Notification

1 If a per­son is ar­res­ted, or placed on re­mand or in pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion, the rel­ev­ant crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall im­me­di­ately no­ti­fy:

a.
his or her next-of-kin;
b.
if so re­ques­ted, his or her em­ploy­er or the rel­ev­ant em­bassy or con­su­late.

2 No no­ti­fic­a­tion shall be giv­en if this is pre­cluded by the pur­pose of the in­vest­ig­a­tion or the per­son con­cerned ex­pressly so re­quests.

3 Where an ar­res­ted per­son is sub­ject to a com­puls­ory meas­ure in­volving the depriva­tion of his or her liberty and a de­pend­ant suf­fers dif­fi­culties as a res­ult, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall no­ti­fy the rel­ev­ant so­cial ser­vices au­thor­it­ies.

4 The vic­tim shall be in­formed of the ac­cused be­ing placed in or re­leased from re­mand or pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion, the or­der­ing of an al­tern­at­ive meas­ure un­der Art­icle 237 para­graph 2 let­ter c or g, or if the ac­cused ab­sconds, un­less he or she has ex­pressly re­ques­ted not to be in­formed.69 Such in­form­a­tion may not be provided if it would ex­pose the ac­cused to a ser­i­ous danger.

69 Amended by An­nex No 1 of the FA of 13 Dec. 2013 on Activ­ity Pro­hib­i­tion Or­ders and Con­tact Pro­hib­i­tion and Ex­clu­sion Or­ders, in force since 1 Jan. 2015 (AS 2014 2055; BBl 20128819).

Section 2 Police Powers to Stop and of Pursuit

Art. 215 Police power to stop

1 For the pur­pose of in­vest­ig­at­ing an of­fence, the po­lice may stop a per­son and if ne­ces­sary bring that per­son to the po­lice sta­tion in or­der to:

a.
es­tab­lish the per­son's iden­tity;
b.
ques­tion the per­son briefly;
c.
es­tab­lish wheth­er he or she has com­mit­ted an of­fence;
d.
es­tab­lish wheth­er the per­son or prop­erty in his or her pos­ses­sion is be­ing traced.

2 They may re­quire the per­son they have stopped to:

a.
provide their per­son­al de­tails;
b.
pro­duce iden­tity doc­u­ments;
c.
pro­duce prop­erty in his or her pos­ses­sion;
d.
open con­tain­ers or vehicles.

3 They may re­quest mem­bers of the pub­lic to as­sist them to stop per­sons.

4 If there are spe­cif­ic in­dic­a­tions that an of­fence is be­ing com­mit­ted or per­sons sus­pec­ted of an of­fence are loc­ated at a spe­cif­ic place, the po­lice may cor­don off the loc­a­tion and stop the per­son loc­ated there.

Art. 216 Pursuit

1 The po­lice are en­titled in cases of ur­gency to pur­sue and stop a sus­pect on the ter­rit­ory of an­oth­er com­mune, an­oth­er can­ton and, if in­ter­na­tion­al agree­ments so per­mit, an­oth­er coun­try.

2 If the per­son stopped is then ar­res­ted, he or she shall be handed over im­me­di­ately to the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity at the place where he or she was stopped.

Section 3 Arrest

Art. 217 By the police

1 The po­lice are ob­liged to ar­rest a per­son and bring that per­son to the po­lice sta­tion if:

a.
they have caught the per­son in the act of com­mit­ting a felony or mis­de­mean­our or they have en­countered him or her im­me­di­ately after com­mit­ting such an of­fence;
b.
the per­son is sub­ject to an ar­rest war­rant.

2 They may ar­rest a per­son and bring him or her to the po­lice sta­tion if, based on en­quir­ies or oth­er re­li­able in­form­a­tion, the per­son is sus­pec­ted of com­mit­ting a felony or mis­de­mean­our.

3 They may ar­rest a per­son and bring him or her to the po­lice sta­tion if they have caught the per­son in the act of com­mit­ting a con­tra­ven­tion or they have en­countered him or her im­me­di­ately after com­mit­ting such an of­fence in the event that:

a.
the per­son re­fuses to provide his or her per­son­al de­tails;
b.
the per­son does not live in Switzer­land and fails to provide se­cur­ity for pay­ment of the an­ti­cip­ated fine im­me­di­ately;
c.
the ar­rest is ne­ces­sary in or­der to pre­vent the per­son from com­mit­ting fur­ther con­tra­ven­tions.

Art. 218 By private individuals

1 Where there is in­suf­fi­cient time to ob­tain po­lice as­sist­ance, mem­bers of the pub­lic have the right to ar­rest a per­son if:

a.
they have caught the per­son in the act of com­mit­ting a felony or mis­de­mean­our or they have en­countered him or her im­me­di­ately after com­mit­ting such an of­fence; or
b.
the pub­lic have been re­ques­ted to as­sist in tra­cing of the per­son con­cerned.

2 When mak­ing an ar­rest, private in­di­vidu­als may only use force in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 200.

3 Ar­res­ted per­sons must be handed over to the po­lice as quickly as pos­sible.

Art. 219 Police procedure

1 The po­lice shall es­tab­lish the iden­tity of the ar­res­ted per­son im­me­di­ately after the ar­rest, in­form him or her of the reas­on for the ar­rest in a lan­guage the per­son can un­der­stand and cau­tion the per­son as to his or her rights with­in the mean­ing of Art­icle 158. There­after, they shall in­form the pub­lic pro­sec­utor im­me­di­ately of the ar­rest.

2 They shall then ques­tion the ar­res­ted per­son in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 159 on the sus­pec­ted of­fences and carry out ap­pro­pri­ate in­vest­ig­a­tions im­me­di­ately in or­der to sub­stan­ti­ate or re­but the al­leg­a­tions and any oth­er grounds for de­ten­tion.

3 If in­vest­ig­a­tions re­veal that there are no grounds for de­ten­tion or such reas­ons no longer ap­ply, they shall re­lease the ar­res­ted per­son im­me­di­ately. If the in­vest­ig­a­tions con­firm the sus­pi­cions and any grounds for de­ten­tion, they shall hand the per­son over to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor im­me­di­ately.

4 Re­lease or han­dover shall in any case take place at the latest with­in 24 hours; if the per­son was stopped be­fore the ar­rest, then the peri­od while stopped shall be taken in­to ac­count when cal­cu­lat­ing the time lim­it.

5 If the po­lice have pro­vi­sion­ally ar­res­ted a per­son in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 217 para­graph 3, the per­son may only be held for more than 3 hours if a cor­res­pond­ing or­der is giv­en by a po­lice of­ficer au­thor­ised to do so by the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton.

Section 4 Remand and Preventive Detention: General Provisions

Art. 220 Definitions

1 Re­mand be­gins when it is ordered by the com­puls­ory meas­ures court and ends with the re­ceipt by the court of first in­stance of the in­dict­ment, the ac­cel­er­ated com­mence­ment of a cus­todi­al sanc­tion or with the ac­cused's re­lease dur­ing the in­vest­ig­a­tion.

2 Pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion is the peri­od of de­ten­tion between the time of re­ceipt by the court of first in­stance of the in­dict­ment and the is­sue of a fi­nal judg­ment, the com­mence­ment of a cus­todi­al sanc­tion, the en­force­ment of an ex­pul­sion or­der, or the ac­cused's re­lease.70

70 Amended by An­nex No 5 of the FA of 20 March 2015 (Im­ple­ment­a­tion of Art. 121 para. 3–6 Fed­er­al Con­sti­tu­tion on the ex­pul­sion of for­eign na­tion­als con­victed of cer­tain crim­in­al of­fences), in force since 1 Oct. 2016 (AS 2016 2329; BBl 2013 5975).

Art. 221 Requirements

1 Re­mand and pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion are only per­mit­ted if there is a strong sus­pi­cion that the ac­cused has com­mit­ted a felony or mis­de­mean­our and there is a ser­i­ous con­cern that the ac­cused:

a.
will evade crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings or the an­ti­cip­ated sanc­tion by ab­scond­ing;
b.
will in­flu­ence people or tamper with evid­ence in or­der to com­prom­ise ef­forts to es­tab­lish the truth; or
c.
will pose a con­sid­er­able risk to the safety of oth­ers by com­mit­ting ser­i­ous felon­ies or mis­de­mean­ours as he or she has already com­mit­ted sim­il­ar of­fences.

2 De­ten­tion is also per­mit­ted if there is ser­i­ous con­cern that a per­son will carry out a threat to com­mit a ser­i­ous felony.

Art. 222 Appellate remedies 71

A de­tain­ee may con­test de­cisions or­der­ing, ex­tend­ing or end­ing his or her re­mand or pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion be­fore the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity, sub­ject to Art­icle 233.

71 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125).

Art. 223 Communications with the defence in detention proceedings

1 The de­fence agent may be present in de­ten­tion pro­ceed­ings when the ac­cused is in­ter­viewed or when oth­er evid­ence is be­ing gathered.

2 The ac­cused may at any time com­mu­nic­ate privately with his or her de­fence agent in writ­ing or or­ally in pro­ceed­ings be­fore the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the courts re­lat­ing to de­ten­tion.

Section 5 Remand

Art. 224 Remand proceedings before the public prosecutor

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall ques­tion the ac­cused im­me­di­ately and give the ac­cused the op­por­tun­ity to make a state­ment re­gard­ing the sus­pec­ted of­fence and the grounds for re­mand. It shall im­me­di­ately re­cord all evid­ence that may sub­stan­ti­ate or re­but the sus­pi­cions and the grounds for de­ten­tion provided such evid­ence is read­ily avail­able.

2 If the sus­pi­cions and the grounds for re­mand are con­firmed, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall im­me­di­ately ap­ply to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court, but at the latest with­in 48 hours of the ar­rest, for the ac­cused to be re­manded or for an al­tern­at­ive meas­ure. It shall file its ap­plic­a­tion in writ­ing, with a brief state­ment of reas­ons and the most rel­ev­ant files.

3 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor de­cides against ap­ply­ing for re­mand, it shall or­der the ac­cused's im­me­di­ate re­lease. If it ap­plies for an al­tern­at­ive meas­ure, it shall take the re­quired pre­vent­ive meas­ures.

Art. 225 Detention proceedings before the compulsory measures court

1 On re­ceipt of the ap­plic­a­tion from the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall im­me­di­ately ar­range a private hear­ing with the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the ac­cused and his or her de­fence agent; it may re­quire the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to par­ti­cip­ate.

2 If so re­ques­ted, it shall per­mit the ac­cused and the de­fence to in­spect the files in its pos­ses­sion be­fore the hear­ing.

3 Any per­son who is per­mit­ted not to at­tend the hear­ing may sub­mit ap­plic­a­tions in writ­ing or make ref­er­ence to earli­er sub­mis­sions.

4 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall gath­er all the im­me­di­ately avail­able evid­ence that may sub­stan­ti­ate or re­but the sus­pi­cions or the grounds for de­ten­tion.

5 If the ac­cused ex­pressly waives the right to a hear­ing, the com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall de­cide in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings on the basis of the ap­plic­a­tion made by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the sub­mis­sions made by the ac­cused.

Art. 226 Decision of the compulsory measures court

1 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court de­cides im­me­di­ately, but at the latest with­in 48 hours of re­ceipt of the ap­plic­a­tion.

2 It shall give im­me­di­ate no­tice of its de­cision to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the ac­cused and his or her de­fence law­yer or­ally, or, if they are ab­sent, in writ­ing. It shall then provide them with a brief writ­ten state­ment of the grounds.

3 If it or­ders the ac­cused to be re­manded, it shall in­form the ac­cused that he or she may file an ap­plic­a­tion for re­lease from re­mand at any time.

4 In its de­cision it may:

a.
stip­u­late a max­im­um term for re­mand;
b.
in­struct the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to carry out spe­cif­ic in­vest­ig­at­ive activ­it­ies;
c.
or­der al­tern­at­ive meas­ures to re­mand.

5 If it de­cides not to or­der the ac­cused to be re­manded, the ac­cused shall be re­leased im­me­di­ately.

Art. 227 Application to extend the period of remand

1 If the peri­od on re­mand ordered by the com­puls­ory meas­ures court ex­pires, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor may file an ap­plic­a­tion to ex­tend the peri­od of re­mand. If the com­puls­ory meas­ures court has not lim­ited the peri­od of re­mand, the ap­plic­a­tion must be filed be­fore the ac­cused has spent 3 months on re­mand.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall file a writ­ten ap­plic­a­tion stat­ing the grounds with the com­puls­ory meas­ures court 4 days at the latest be­fore the ex­piry of the peri­od of re­mand, to­geth­er with the most rel­ev­ant files.

3 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall give the ac­cused and his or her de­fence law­yer the op­por­tun­ity to in­spect the files in its pos­ses­sion and to re­spond to the ap­plic­a­tion in writ­ing with­in 3 days.

4 It may or­der the pro­vi­sion­al con­tinu­ation of re­mand pending its de­cision.

5 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall de­cide at the latest with­in 5 days of re­ceipt of the re­sponse or the ex­piry of the time lim­it men­tioned in para­graph 3 above. It may in­struct the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to carry out spe­cif­ic in­vest­ig­at­ive activ­it­ies, or or­der an al­tern­at­ive meas­ure.

6 The pro­ceed­ings are nor­mally con­duc­ted in writ­ing, but the com­puls­ory meas­ures court may or­der a hear­ing, which shall be held in private.

7 An ex­ten­sion of the peri­od on re­mand may be gran­ted for a max­im­um of 3 months, or in ex­cep­tion­al cases for a max­im­um of 6 months.

Art. 228 Application for release from remand

1 The ac­cused may ap­ply to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor at any time in writ­ing or or­ally on re­cord for re­lease from re­mand, sub­ject to para­graph 5 be­low. The ap­plic­a­tion must be ac­com­pan­ied by a brief state­ment of grounds.

2 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor grants the ap­plic­a­tion, it shall re­lease the ac­cused from re­mand im­me­di­ately. If it does not wish to grant the ap­plic­a­tion, it shall pass the same to­geth­er with the files no later than 3 days after re­ceipt to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court ac­com­pan­ied by a state­ment of its opin­ion.

3 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall send the opin­ion to the ac­cused and his or her de­fence law­yer and al­low them 3 days to re­spond.

4 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall de­cide at the latest with­in 5 days of re­ceiv­ing the re­sponse or of the ex­piry of the time lim­it men­tioned in para­graph 3 above. If the ac­cused ex­pressly waives the right to a hear­ing, the de­cision may be is­sued in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings. Art­icle 226 para­graphs 2–5 also ap­plies mu­tatis mutandis.

5 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court may in its de­cision spe­cify a time lim­it of a max­im­um of one month with­in which the ac­cused is not per­mit­ted to file a fur­ther ap­plic­a­tion for re­lease.

Section 6 Preventive Detention

Art. 229 Decision to order preventive detention

1 In cases where the ac­cused has already been on re­mand, an ap­plic­a­tion for pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion is filed in writ­ing by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the de­cision on wheth­er to or­der pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion is taken by the com­puls­ory meas­ures court.

2 Where grounds for de­ten­tion arise only after charges have been brought, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings in the court of first in­stance shall con­duct de­ten­tion pro­ceed­ings in ana­log­ous ap­plic­a­tion of Art­icle 224 and shall re­quest the com­puls­ory meas­ures court to or­der pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion.

3 The pro­ceed­ings be­fore the com­puls­ory meas­ures court are gov­erned by:

a.
Art­icles 225 and 226 mu­tatis mutandis where the ac­cused has not been on re­mand;
b.
Art­icle 227 mu­tatis mutandis where the ac­cused has already been on re­mand.

Art. 230 Release from preventive detention during the proceedings before the court of first instance

1 The ac­cused and the pub­lic pro­sec­utor may file an ap­plic­a­tion for re­lease from de­ten­tion dur­ing the pro­ceed­ings be­fore the court of first in­stance.

2 The ap­plic­a­tion must be sub­mit­ted to the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings in the court of first in­stance.

3 If the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings grants the ap­plic­a­tion, he or she shall re­lease the ac­cused from de­ten­tion im­me­di­ately. If the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings does not wish to grant the ap­plic­a­tion, it shall be passed on to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court for a de­cision to be made.

4 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings in the court of first in­stance may also or­der the ac­cused to be re­leased from de­ten­tion provided the pub­lic pro­sec­utor con­sents. If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor does not con­sent, the com­puls­ory meas­ures court de­cides.

5 The pro­vi­sions of Art­icle 228 also ap­ply mu­tatis mutandis.

Art. 231 Preventive detention following the judgment of the court of first instance

1 The court of first in­stance shall de­cide in its judg­ment wheth­er a per­son con­victed should be placed or should re­main in pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion:

a.
in or­der to en­sure that a sen­tence or meas­ure is duly ex­ecuted;
b.
with a view to ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings.

2 If an ac­cused in de­ten­tion is ac­quit­ted and the court of first in­stance or­ders his or her re­lease, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor may ap­ply to the court of first in­stance for the dir­ect­or of ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings to or­der the con­tinu­ation of pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion. In such a case, the per­son con­cerned shall re­main in de­ten­tion un­til the dir­ect­or of ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings makes a de­cision. The dir­ect­or of ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings shall de­cide on the ap­plic­a­tion made by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor with­in 5 days of the ap­plic­a­tion be­ing filed.

3 If the ob­jec­tions with­drawn, the court of first in­stance shall de­cide on how the peri­od spent in de­ten­tion fol­low­ing the judg­ment will be taken in­to ac­count.

Art. 232 Preventive detention during proceedings before the court of appeal

1 If grounds for de­ten­tion arise only dur­ing pro­ceed­ings be­fore the court of ap­peal, the dir­ect­or of ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings shall or­der the per­son to be placed in de­ten­tion to be brought be­fore the court im­me­di­ately in or­der to be heard.

2 A de­cision shall be made with­in 48 hours of the hear­ing; their de­cision is fi­nal.

Art. 233 Application for release from detention during proceedings before the court of appeal

The dir­ect­or of ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings shall de­cide on an ap­plic­a­tion for re­lease from de­ten­tion with­in 5 days; the de­cision is fi­nal.

Section 7 Execution of Remand and Preventive Detention

Art. 234 Detention centre

1 Re­mand and pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion is nor­mally car­ried out in de­ten­tion centres re­served for this pur­pose and which are oth­er­wise used only for the ex­e­cu­tion of short cus­todi­al sen­tences.

2 If it is ad­vis­able for med­ic­al reas­ons, the rel­ev­ant can­ton­al au­thor­ity may ar­range for the de­tain­ee to be ad­mit­ted to a hos­pit­al or psy­chi­at­ric hos­pit­al.

Art. 235 Conditions of detention

1 The de­tain­ee's per­son­al free­dom may not be more strictly lim­ited than is re­quired for the pur­pose of de­ten­tion or for or­der and se­cur­ity in the de­ten­tion centre.

2 Con­tact between the de­tain­ee and oth­er per­sons re­quires au­thor­isa­tion from the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings. Vis­its shall if ne­ces­sary be su­per­vised.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall in­spect in­com­ing and out­go­ing post, with the ex­cep­tion of cor­res­pond­ence with the su­per­vis­ory and crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies. Dur­ing pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may del­eg­ate this task to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

4 The de­tain­ee may com­mu­nic­ate freely with his or her de­fence agent without the con­tent of com­mu­nic­a­tions be­ing in­spec­ted. If there is jus­ti­fied sus­pi­cion that this right is be­ing ab­used, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may with ap­prov­al of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court re­strict free com­mu­nic­a­tion for a lim­ited peri­od, provided pri­or no­tice is giv­en to the de­tain­ee and the de­fence agent of the re­stric­tions.

5 The can­tons shall reg­u­late the rights and ob­lig­a­tions of per­sons in cus­tody, their rights to leg­al re­dress, dis­cip­lin­ary meas­ures and the su­per­vi­sion of de­ten­tion centres.

Art. 236 Accelerated execution of sentences and measures

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may au­thor­ise the ac­cused to be­gin a cus­todi­al sen­tence or cus­todi­al meas­ure in ad­vance of the an­ti­cip­ated date, provided the status of the pro­ceed­ings per­mit this.

2 If the charges have already been filed, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall con­sult the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

3 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may provide that the ex­e­cu­tion of a meas­ure in ad­vance of the an­ti­cip­ated date re­quires the con­sent of the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for its ex­e­cu­tion.

4 On ad­mis­sion to a pen­al in­sti­tu­tion, the ac­cused be­gins his or her sen­tence or meas­ure; from this point the ac­cused is gov­erned by the rel­ev­ant re­gime un­less this con­flicts with the pur­pose of the ac­cused's re­mand or pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion.

Section 8 Alternative Measures

Art. 237 General Provisions

1 The rel­ev­ant court shall or­der one or more le­ni­ent meas­ures in­stead of re­mand or pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion if such meas­ures achieve the same res­ult as de­ten­tion.

2 Al­tern­at­ive meas­ures in­clude in par­tic­u­lar:

a.
the pay­ment of money bail;
b.
the sur­ren­der­ing of a pass­port or iden­tity pa­pers;
c.
the re­quire­ment to stay or not to stay in a spe­cif­ic place or in a spe­cif­ic house;
d.
the re­quire­ment to re­port to a pub­lic of­fice at reg­u­larly in­ter­vals;
e.
the re­quire­ment to do a reg­u­lar job;
f.
the re­quire­ment to un­der­go med­ic­al treat­ment or a med­ic­al ex­am­in­a­tion;
g.
the pro­hib­i­tion of mak­ing con­tact with spe­cif­ic per­sons.

3 In or­der to mon­it­or such al­tern­at­ive meas­ures, the court may or­der the use of tech­nic­al devices and that they be se­curely fastened to the per­son be­ing mon­itored.

4 The or­der­ing of al­tern­at­ive meas­ures and ap­peals against such meas­ures are gov­erned mu­tatis mutandis by the reg­u­la­tions on re­mand and pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion.

5 The court may re­voke the al­tern­at­ive meas­ures at any time, or or­der oth­er al­tern­at­ive meas­ures or the ac­cused's re­mand or pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion if new cir­cum­stances so re­quire or if the ac­cused fails to ful­fil the re­quire­ments stip­u­lated.

Art. 238 Payment of money bail

1 Where there is a risk that the ac­cused may ab­scond, the rel­ev­ant court may or­der pay­ment of a sum of money in or­der to en­sure that the ac­cused ap­pears for all pro­ced­ur­al acts or to be­gin a cus­todi­al sanc­tion.

2 The amount of the bail pay­ment is as­sessed on the basis of the ser­i­ous­ness of the of­fences of which the ac­cused is sus­pec­ted and of the ac­cused's per­son­al cir­cum­stances.

3 The pay­ment of money bail may be made in cash or by means of a guar­an­tee is­sued by a bank or in­sur­ance com­pany per­man­ently es­tab­lished in Switzer­land.

Art. 239 Return of the bail payment

1 The bail pay­ment shall be re­turned if:

a.
the grounds for de­ten­tion no longer ap­ply;
b.
the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings are con­cluded by a fi­nal judg­ment of aban­don­ment or ac­quit­tal;
c.
the ac­cused has be­gun a cus­todi­al sanc­tion.

2 Be­fore the bail pay­ment made by the ac­cused is re­turned, any mon­et­ary pen­al­ties, fines, costs and dam­ages that have been im­posed on the ac­cused may be de­duc­ted from it.

3 The au­thor­ity be­fore which the case is pending or was last pending shall de­cide on the re­turn of the bail pay­ment.

Art. 240 Forfeiture of the bail payment

1 If the ac­cused ab­sconds dur­ing the pro­ceed­ings or the ex­e­cu­tion of a cus­todi­al sanc­tion, the bail pay­ment shall be for­feited to the Con­fed­er­a­tion or to the can­ton whose court ordered the same.

2 If a third party made the bail pay­ment, the for­feit­ure may be waived if the third party provides the au­thor­it­ies with in­form­a­tion in good time to en­able the ac­cused to be ap­pre­hen­ded.

3 The au­thor­ity be­fore which the case is pending or was last pending shall de­cide on the for­feit­ure of the bail pay­ment.

4 A for­feited bail pay­ment shall be used in ana­log­ous ap­plic­a­tion of Art­icle 73 SCC72 to cov­er the claims of per­sons suf­fer­ing harm and, if a sur­plus re­mains, to cov­er the mon­et­ary pen­al­ties, fines and the pro­ced­ur­al costs. Any sur­plus still re­main­ing shall pass to the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton.

Chapter 4 Searches and Examinations

Section 1 General Provisions

Art. 241 Authorisation

1 Searches shall be au­thor­ised by writ­ten war­rant. In cases of ur­gency, they may be au­thor­ised or­ally, but this must be con­firmed sub­sequently in writ­ing.

2 The war­rant shall in­dic­ate:

a.
the per­sons, premises, prop­erty or re­cords to be searched;
b.
the pur­pose of the meas­ure;
c.
the au­thor­it­ies or per­sons au­thor­ised to con­duct the meas­ure.

3 If there is a risk in any delay, the po­lice may au­thor­ise the manu­al search of body ori­fices and body cav­it­ies and carry out searches without a war­rant; they shall in­form com­pet­ent crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity about the search im­me­di­ately.

4 The po­lice may search a per­son who has been stopped or ar­res­ted per­son, in par­tic­u­lar in or­der to guar­an­tee the safety of oth­er per­sons.

Art. 242 Conduct of searches

1 The au­thor­it­ies or per­sons car­ry­ing out the search shall take suit­able safety pre­cau­tions in or­der to achieve the aim of the meas­ure.

2 They may pro­hib­it per­sons from leav­ing dur­ing a search.

Art. 243 Accidental finds

1 Evid­ence or prop­erty found that is not con­nec­ted with the of­fence un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion but which ap­pears to re­late to a dif­fer­ent of­fence shall be se­cured.

2 The prop­erty shall be handed over with a re­port there­on to the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings, who shall de­cide on the fur­ther course of ac­tion.

Section 2 Searches of Premises

Art. 244 Principle

1 Houses, dwell­ings and oth­er rooms not gen­er­ally ac­cess­ible may only be searched with the con­sent the pro­pri­et­or.

2 The pro­pri­et­or's con­sent is not re­quired if it is sus­pec­ted that on the premises:

a.
there are wanted per­sons;
b.
there is forensic evid­ence or prop­erty or as­sets that must be seized;
c.
of­fences are be­ing com­mit­ted.

Art. 245 Conduct of searches

1 The per­sons au­thor­ised to carry out the search shall pro­duce the search war­rant at the start of the search.

2 Pro­pri­et­ors of premises be­ing searched who are present must re­main on the premises dur­ing the search. If they are ab­sent, if pos­sible an adult fam­ily mem­ber or an­oth­er suit­able per­son must re­main present.

Section 3 Search of Records and Recordings

Art. 246 Principle

Doc­u­ments, au­dio, video and oth­er re­cord­ings, data car­ri­ers and equip­ment for pro­cessing and stor­ing in­form­a­tion may be searched if it is sus­pec­ted that they con­tain in­form­a­tion that is li­able to seizure.

Art. 247 Conduct

1 The pro­pri­et­or may com­ment be­fore a search on the con­tent of re­cords and re­cord­ings.

2 Ex­perts may be called in to ex­am­ine the con­tent of re­cords and re­cord­ings, and in par­tic­u­lar to identi­fy re­cords and re­cord­ings with pro­tec­ted con­tent.

3 The pro­pri­et­or may provide the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity with cop­ies of re­cords and re­cord­ings and prin­touts of stored in­form­a­tion if this is suf­fi­cient for the pur­pose of the pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 248 Sealing of evidence

1 Re­cords and prop­erty that ac­cord­ing to the pro­pri­et­or may not be searched or seized due to the right to re­main si­lent or to re­fuse to testi­fy or for oth­er reas­ons must be sealed and may neither be in­spec­ted nor used by the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies.

2 Un­less the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity files a re­quest for the re­mov­al of the seals with­in 20 days, the sealed re­cords and prop­erty shall be re­turned to the pro­pri­et­or.

3 If it files a re­quest for the re­mov­al of the seals, the fol­low­ing courts shall is­sue a fi­nal judg­ment there­on with­in a month:

a.
in pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings: the com­puls­ory meas­ures court;
b.
in oth­er cases: the court be­fore which the case is pending.

4 The court may call in an ex­pert to ex­am­ine the con­tent of re­cords and prop­erty.

Section 4 Searches of Persons and Property

Art. 249 Principle

Per­sons and prop­erty may only be searched without con­sent if it is sus­pec­ted that forensic evid­ence or prop­erty or as­sets that must be seized may be found.

Art. 250 Conduct

1 Search­ing per­sons in­cludes the ex­am­in­a­tion of cloth­ing, items car­ried by the per­son con­cerned, con­tain­ers and vehicles, the sur­face of the body and vis­ible body ori­fices and body cav­it­ies.

2 Searches of a per­son's gen­it­al area shall be car­ried out by a per­son of the same gender or by a doc­tor, un­less the meas­ure can­not be delayed.

Section 5 Examination of Persons

Art. 251 Principle

1 An ex­am­in­a­tion of a per­son in­cludes an ex­am­in­a­tion of their phys­ic­al or men­tal con­di­tion.

2 The ac­cused may be ques­tioned in or­der to:

a.
es­tab­lish the facts of the case;
b.
es­tab­lish wheth­er the he or she had the men­tal ca­pa­city to be held crim­in­ally li­able, is fit to plead and to with­stand de­ten­tion.

3 In­ter­ven­tions in the phys­ic­al in­teg­rity of the ac­cused may be ordered provided they do not cause par­tic­u­lar pain or any risk to health.

4 Ex­am­in­a­tions and in­ter­ven­tions in the phys­ic­al in­teg­rity of per­sons oth­er than the ac­cused are only per­mit­ted without con­sent if they are es­sen­tial in or­der to prop­erly in­vest­ig­ate an of­fence un­der Art­icles 111–113, 122, 124, 140, 184, 185, 187, 189, 190 or 191 SCC73.74

73 SR 311.0

74 Amended by No III of the FA of 30 Sept. 2011, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2012 (AS 2012 2575; BBl 2010 56515677).

Art. 252 Conduct of physical examinations

Ex­am­in­a­tions of per­sons and in­ter­ven­tions in their phys­ic­al in­teg­rity shall be car­ried out by a doc­tor or an­oth­er med­ic­al spe­cial­ist.

Section 6 Examination of Dead Bodies

Art. 253 Unnatural deaths

1 If there are in­dic­a­tions that a death did not oc­cur nat­ur­ally, and in par­tic­u­lar in­dic­a­tions of an of­fence, or if the body is uniden­ti­fied, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall or­der an in­spec­tion of the body to be car­ried out by a spe­cial­ist doc­tor in or­der to es­tab­lish the cause of death or to identi­fy the body.

2 If, after the in­spec­tion of the body, there is no evid­ence that an of­fence has been com­mit­ted and if iden­tity is es­tab­lished, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall re­lease the body for the fu­ner­al.

3 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall oth­er­wise or­der the body to be se­cured and fur­ther tests, and if ne­ces­sary an autopsy to be car­ried out by an in­sti­tute for forensic medi­cine. It may or­der the body or parts there­of to be re­tained for as long as re­quired for the pur­pose of the in­vest­ig­a­tion.

4 The can­tons shall de­cide per­sons in the med­ic­al pro­fes­sion are re­quired to re­port un­nat­ur­al deaths to the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies.

Art. 254 Exhumation

If it ap­pears ne­ces­sary in for the prop­er in­vest­ig­a­tion of an of­fence, the ex­huma­tion of a body or the open­ing of an urn con­tain­ing its ashes may be ordered.

Chapter 5 DNA Analyses

Art. 255 General requirements

1 In or­der to in­vest­ig­ate a felony or a mis­de­mean­our, a sample may be taken to cre­ate a DNA pro­file from:

a.
the ac­cused;
b.
oth­er per­sons, in par­tic­u­lar vic­tims or per­sons en­titled to be present at the place of com­mis­sion, in­so­far as this is ne­ces­sary to dis­tin­guish their bio­lo­gic­al ma­ter­i­al from that of the ac­cused;
c.
de­ceased per­sons;
d.
bio­lo­gic­al ma­ter­i­al rel­ev­ant to the of­fence.

2 The po­lice may or­der:

a.
a sample to be taken from per­sons by non-in­vas­ive meth­ods;
b.
the cre­ation of a DNA pro­file from bio­lo­gic­al ma­ter­i­al rel­ev­ant to the of­fence.

Art. 256 Mass testing

In an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to a felony, the com­puls­ory meas­ures court may at the re­quest of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or­der that samples be taken to cre­ate DNA pro­files from per­sons who dis­play spe­cif­ic char­ac­ter­ist­ics es­tab­lished as be­ing rel­ev­ant to the com­mis­sion of the of­fence.

Art. 257 Convicted persons

The court may in its judg­ment or­der that a sample be taken to cre­ate a DNA pro­file from per­sons who:

a.
have re­ceived a cus­todi­al sen­tence of more than a year on be­ing con­victed of a wil­fully com­mit­ted felony;
b.
have been con­victed of a wil­fully com­mit­ted felony or mis­de­mean­our against life and limb or against sexu­al in­teg­rity;
c.
have been ordered to un­der­go a thera­peut­ic meas­ure or the in­def­in­ite in­car­cer­a­tion.

Art. 258 Taking samples

Where in­vas­ive meth­ods are used to take samples, the sample shall be taken by a doc­tor or an­oth­er med­ic­al spe­cial­ist.

Art. 259 Application of the DNA Profiling Act

The DNA Pro­fil­ing Act of 20 June 200375 also ap­plies.

Chapter 6 Recording Identification Data, Handwriting and Voice Samples

Art. 260 Recording identification data

1 When re­cord­ing iden­ti­fic­a­tion data, the phys­ic­al char­ac­ter­ist­ics of a per­son shall be noted and prints taken of parts of the body.

2 The po­lice, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the courts, or in cases of ur­gency the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may or­der the re­cord­ing of identi­fy­ing data.

3 The re­cord­ing of identi­fy­ing data shall be ordered in a writ­ten war­rant, with a brief state­ment of the reas­ons. In cases of ur­gency, it may be ordered or­ally, but must sub­sequently be con­firmed and ex­plained in writ­ing.

4 If the per­son con­cerned re­fuses to ac­cept the po­lice or­der, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall de­cide.

Art. 261 Retention and use of identifying documents

1 Doc­u­ments that identi­fy the ac­cused may be re­tained out­side the case file for the fol­low­ing peri­ods and, in the event of a reas­on­able sus­pi­cion that a new of­fence has been com­mit­ted may also be used:

a.
in the event of the ac­cused's con­vic­tion or his or her ac­quit­tal on the grounds that he or she not leg­ally re­spons­ible due to a men­tal dis­order: un­til the ex­piry the time lim­its for the re­mov­al of the rel­ev­ant entry from the re­gister of crim­in­al con­vic­tions;
b.
in the event of ac­quit­tal on oth­er grounds, the aban­don­ment of the pro­ceed­ings or a de­cision to not to bring pro­ceed­ings: un­til the de­cision be­comes leg­ally bind­ing.

2 If it is an­ti­cip­ated in a case un­der para­graph 1 let­ter b due to cer­tain mat­ters that doc­u­ments identi­fy­ing the ac­cused could be used in the in­vest­ig­a­tion of fu­ture of­fences, they may be re­tained and used with the con­sent of the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings for a max­im­um of 10 years from when the de­cision be­comes leg­ally bind­ing.

3 Doc­u­ments identi­fy­ing per­sons oth­er than the ac­cused must be des­troyed as soon as the pro­ceed­ings against the ac­cused have been con­cluded or aban­doned or it has been de­cided not to bring pro­ceed­ings.

4 If it be­comes clear be­fore the ex­piry of the time lim­its un­der para­graphs 1–3 that there is no longer any in­terest in re­tain­ing or us­ing the identi­fy­ing doc­u­ments, they shall be des­troyed.

Art. 262 Handwriting and voice samples

1 Ac­cused per­sons, wit­nesses and per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion may be re­quired to provide hand­writ­ing or voice samples for com­par­is­on with oth­er such samples.

2 Any per­son who re­fuses to provide such a sample may be is­sued with a fixed pen­alty fine. The fore­go­ing does not ap­ply to the ac­cused and, where such rights ap­ply, per­sons who have the right to re­main si­lent or to re­fuse to testi­fy.

Chapter 7 Seizure

Art. 263 Principle

1 Items and as­sets be­long­ing to an ac­cused or to a third party may be seized if it is ex­pec­ted that the items or as­sets:

a.
will be used as evid­ence;
b.
will be used as se­cur­ity for pro­ced­ur­al costs, mon­et­ary pen­al­ties, fines or dam­ages;
c.
will have to be re­turned to the per­sons suf­fer­ing harm;
d.
will have to be for­feited.

2 Seizure shall be ordered on the basis of a writ­ten war­rant con­tain­ing a brief state­ment of the grounds. In ur­gent cases, seizure may be ordered or­ally, but the or­der must there­after be con­firmed in writ­ing.

3 Where there is a risk in any delay, the po­lice or mem­bers of the pub­lic may pro­vi­sion­ally seize items or as­sets on be­half of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the courts.

Art. 264 Restrictions

1 The fol­low­ing items may not be seized ir­re­spect­ive of their loc­a­tion and of when they were cre­ated:

a.
doc­u­ments used in com­mu­nic­a­tions between the ac­cused and his or her de­fence law­yer;
b.
per­son­al re­cords and cor­res­pond­ence be­long­ing to the ac­cused if the in­terest in pro­tect­ing his or her pri­vacy out­weighs the in­terest in pro­sec­u­tion;
c.76
items and doc­u­ments used in com­mu­nic­a­tions between the ac­cused and per­sons who may re­fuse to testi­fy in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 170–173 and who are not ac­cused of an of­fence re­lat­ing to the same case;
d.77
items and doc­u­ments used in com­mu­nic­a­tions between an­oth­er per­son and his or her law­yer provided the law­yer is en­titled to rep­res­ent cli­ents be­fore Swiss courts in ac­cord­ance with the Law­yers Act of 23 June 200078 and is not ac­cused an of­fence re­lat­ing to the same case.

2 The re­stric­tions in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 1 do not ap­ply to items and as­sets that must be seized with a view to their re­turn to the per­son suf­fer­ing harm or their for­feit­ure.

3 If an en­titled per­son claims that a seizure of items or as­sets is not per­mit­ted on the grounds of a right to re­fuse to make a state­ment or testi­fy or for oth­er reas­ons, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies shall pro­ceed in ac­cord­ance with the reg­u­la­tions on the seal­ing of evid­ence.

76 Amended by No I 6 of the FA of 28 Sept. 2012 on the Amend­ment of Pro­ced­ur­al Pro­vi­sions on Pro­fes­sion­al Con­fid­en­ti­al­ity for Law­yers, in force since 1 May 2013 (AS 2013 847; BBl 2011 8181).

77 In­ser­ted by No I 6 of the FA of 28 Sept. 2012 on the Amend­ment of Pro­ced­ur­al Pro­vi­sions on Pro­fes­sion­al Con­fid­en­ti­al­ity for Law­yers, in force since 1 May 2013 (AS 2013 847; BBl 2011 8181).

78 SR 935.61

Art. 265 Duty to hand over items or assets

1 The hold­er is ob­liged to hand over items or as­sets that should be seized.

2 The fol­low­ing per­sons are not re­quired to hand over items or as­sets:

a.
the ac­cused;
b.
per­sons who have the right to re­main si­lent or to re­fuse to testi­fy, to the ex­tent that that right ap­plies;
c.
cor­por­ate un­der­tak­ings, if by hand­ing over items they could in­crim­in­ate them­selves such that they:
1.
could be held li­able un­der crim­in­al law or
2.
could be held li­able un­der civil law and if their in­terest in pro­tec­tion out­weighs the in­terest in pro­sec­u­tion.

3 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity may de­mand that the per­son ob­liged to hand over items or as­sets does so, may fix a dead­line, and no­ti­fy him or her that in the event of non-com­pli­ance the pen­al­ties men­tioned in Art­icle 292 SCC79 or a fixed pen­alty fine may be im­posed.

4 Com­puls­ory meas­ures are only per­mit­ted if the per­son con­cerned re­fuses to hand over the items or as­sets or if it may be as­sumed that a de­mand to hand over the items or as­sets may pre­ju­dice the suc­cess of the meas­ure.

Art. 266 Procedure

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity or­der­ing seizure shall con­firm that it has re­ceived the prop­erty and as­sets seized or handed over in the seizure or­der or in a sep­ar­ate re­ceipt.

2 It shall draw up a list and safe­guard the prop­erty and as­sets ap­pro­pri­ately.

3 If im­mov­able prop­erty is seized, an in­hib­i­tion shall be ordered; this shall be re­cor­ded in the Land Re­gister.

4 The seizure of a debt shall be no­ti­fied to the debt­or, who shall be ad­vised that re­pay­ment to the cred­it­or will not settle the debt.

5 Prop­erty that is sub­ject to rap­id de­pre­ci­ation or re­quires ex­pens­ive main­ten­ance, as well as se­cur­it­ies or oth­er as­sets with a stock ex­change or mar­ket price may be sold im­me­di­ately in ac­cord­ance with the Fed­er­al Act of 11 April 188980 on Debt En­force­ment and Bank­ruptcy (DEBA). The pro­ceeds shall be seized.

6 The Fed­er­al Coun­cil shall reg­u­late the in­vest­ment of seized as­sets.

Art. 267 Decision on seized property and assets

1 If the grounds for seizure no longer ap­ply, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or court shall re­voke the seizure or­der and hand over the prop­erty or as­sets to the per­son en­titled to them.

2 Where it is un­dis­puted that a per­son has as a dir­ect res­ult of the of­fence been de­prived of an item of prop­erty or an as­set be­long­ing to him or her, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall re­turn the prop­erty or as­set to the per­son en­titled to it be­fore the con­clu­sion of the pro­ceed­ings.

3 Un­less the or­der to seize an item of prop­erty or an as­set has already been re­voked, a de­cision on its re­turn to the en­titled per­son, its use to cov­er costs or its for­feit­ure in shall be made in the fi­nal judg­ment.

4 If two or more per­sons lay claim to an item of prop­erty or an as­set in re­spect of which the seizure or­der is to be re­voked, the court may de­cide on the is­sue.

5 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity may award prop­erty or as­sets to a per­son and set the oth­er claimants a time lim­it with­in which to raise a civil ac­tion.

6 If at the time when the seizure or­der is re­voked the iden­tity of the per­son en­titled to the prop­erty or as­sets is un­known, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court shall give pub­lic no­tice that the prop­erty or as­sets are avail­able to be claimed. If no one makes a claim with­in five years of no­tice be­ing giv­en, the seized prop­erty and as­sets shall pass to the can­ton or to the Con­fed­er­a­tion.

Art. 268 Seizure to cover costs

1 As­sets be­long­ing to the ac­cused may be seized to the ex­tent that is an­ti­cip­ated to be re­quired to cov­er:

a.
pro­ced­ur­al costs and dam­ages;
b.
mon­et­ary pen­al­ties and fines.

2 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall take ac­count of the fin­an­cial cir­cum­stances of the ac­cused and his or her fam­ily when de­cid­ing on seizure.

3 Ex­emp­ted from seizure are as­sets that may not be seized in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 92–94 DEBA81.

Chapter 8 Covert Surveillance Measures

Section 1 Surveillance of Post and Telecommunications

Art. 269 Requirements

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may ar­range for post and tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions to be mon­itored if:

a.
there is a strong sus­pi­cion that an of­fence lis­ted in para­graph 2 has been com­mit­ted;
b.
the ser­i­ous­ness of the of­fence jus­ti­fies sur­veil­lance; and
c.
in­vest­ig­at­ive activ­it­ies car­ried out so far have been un­suc­cess­ful or the en­quir­ies would oth­er­wise have no pro­spect of suc­cess or be made un­reas­on­ably com­plic­ated.

2 Sur­veil­lance may be ordered in the in­vest­ig­a­tion of the of­fences un­der the fol­low­ing Art­icles:

a.82
SCC: Art­icles 111–113, 115, 118 para­graph 2, 122, 124, 127, 129, 135, 138–140, 143, 144 para­graph 3, 144bis num­ber 1 para­graph 2 and num­ber 2 para­graph 2, 146–148, 156, 157 num­ber 2, 158 num­ber 1 para­graph 3 and num­ber 2, 160, 163 num­ber 1, 180, 181, 182–185, 187, 188 num­ber 1, 189–191, 192 para­graph 1, 195–197, 220, 221 para­graphs 1 and 2, 223 num­ber 1, 224 para­graph 1, 226, 227 num­ber 1 para­graph 1, 228 num­ber 1 para­graph 1, 230bis, 231 num­ber 1, 232 num­ber 1, 233 num­ber 1, 234 para­graph 1, 237 num­ber 1, 238 para­graph 1, 240 para­graph 1, 242, 244, 251 num­ber 1, 258, 259 para­graph 1, 260bis–260sex­ies, 261bis, 264–267, 271, 272 num­ber 2, 273, 274 num­ber 1 para­graph 2, 285, 301, 303 num­ber 1, 305, 305bis num­ber 2, 310, 312, 314, 317 num­ber 1, 319, 322ter, 322quater and 322sep­ties;
b.83
For­eign Na­tion­als and In­teg­ra­tion Act84 of 16 Decem­ber 200585: Art­icles 116 para­graph 3 and 118 para­graph 3;
c.
Fed­er­al Act of 22 June 200186 on the Hag­ue Con­ven­tion on Ad­op­tion and on Meas­ures to Pro­tect Chil­dren in In­ter­na­tion­al Ad­op­tion Cases: Art­icle 24;
d.87
War Ma­ter­i­al Act of 13 Decem­ber 199688: Art­icles 33 para­graph 2 and 34–35b;
e.
Nuc­le­ar En­ergy Act of 21 March 200389: Art­icles 88 para­graphs 1 and 2, 89 para­graphs 1 and 2 and 90 para­graph 1;
f.90
Nar­cot­ics Act of 3 Oc­to­ber 195191: Art­icles 19 num­ber 1 second sen­tence and num­ber 2, and 20 num­ber 1 second sen­tence;
g.
En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Act of 7 Oc­to­ber 198392: Art­icle 60 para­graph 1 let­ters g–i as well as m and o;
h.
Goods Con­trol Act of 13 Decem­ber 199693: Art­icle 14 para­graph 2;
i.94
Sport Pro­mo­tion Act of 17 June 201195: Art­icle 22 para­graphs 2 and 25a para­graph 3;
j.96
Fin­an­cial Mar­ket In­fra­struc­ture Act of 19 June 201597: Art­icles 154 and 155;
k.98
Weapons Act of 20 June 199799: Art­icle 33 para­graph 3;
l.100
Medi­cin­al Products Act of 15 Decem­ber 2000101: Art­icle 86 para­graphs 2 and 3;
m.102
Gambling Act of 29 Septem­ber 2017103: Art­icle 130 para­graph 2 for the of­fences un­der Art­icle 130 para­graph 1 let­ter a;
n.104
In­tel­li­gence Ser­vice Act of 25 Septem­ber 2015105: Art­icle 74 para­graph 4.

3 If the ad­ju­dic­a­tion an of­fence sub­ject to mil­it­ary jur­is­dic­tion is as­signed to the jur­is­dic­tion of the civil courts, the sur­veil­lance of post and tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions may also be ordered in the in­vest­ig­a­tion of the of­fences un­der Art­icle 70 para­graph 2 of the Mil­it­ary Crim­in­al Pro­ced­ure Code of 23 March 1979106.

82 Amended by An­nex No II 3 of the FedD of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ap­prov­al and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Coun­cil of Europe Con­ven­tion on the Pre­ven­tion of Ter­ror­ism and its Ad­di­tion­al Pro­tocol and the Strength­en­ing of Crim­in­al Justice In­stru­ments for com­bat­ing Ter­ror­ism and Or­gan­ised Crime, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2021 (AS 2021 360; BBl 2018 6427).

83 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125).

84 Title amended on 1 Jan. 2019 in ap­plic­a­tion of Art. 12 para. 2 of the Pub­lic­a­tions Act of 18 June 2004 (SR 170.512). This change has been made throughout the text.

85 SR 142.20

86 SR 211.221.31

87 Amended by No II of the FA of 16 March 2012, in force since 1 Feb. 2013 (AS 2013 295; BBl 20115905).

88 SR 514.51

89 SR 732.1

90 Cor­rec­tion by the Fed­er­al As­sembly Draft­ing Com­mit­tee dated 19 Sept. 2014, pub­lished on 4 Oct. 2014 (AS 2011 4487).

91 SR 812.121

92 SR 814.01

93 SR 946.202

94 In­ser­ted by Art. 34 No 2 of the Sport Pro­mo­tion Act of 17 June 2011 (AS 2012 3953; BBl 2009 8189). Amended by An­nex No II 2 of the Gambling Act of 29 Sept. 2017, in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 5103; BBl 2015 8387).

95 SR 415.0

96 In­ser­ted by No II 4 of the FA of 28 Sept. 2012 (AS 2013 1103; BBl 2011 6873). Amen­ded by An­nex No 4 of the Fin­an­cial Mar­ket In­fra­struc­ture Act of 19 June 2015, in force since 1 Jan. 2016 (AS 2015 5339; BBl 2014 7483).

97 SR 958.1

98 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

99 SR 514.54

100 In­ser­ted by An­nex No 1 of the FD of 29 Sept. 2017 (Medicrime Con­ven­tion), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 4771; BBl 2017 3135).

101 SR 812.21

102 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 2 of the Gambling Act of 29 Sept. 2017, in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 5103; BBl 2015 8387).

103 SR 935.51

104 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 3 of the FedD of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ap­prov­al and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Coun­cil of Europe Con­ven­tion on the Pre­ven­tion of Ter­ror­ism and its Ad­di­tion­al Pro­tocol and the Strength­en­ing of Crim­in­al Justice In­stru­ments for com­bat­ing Ter­ror­ism and Or­gan­ised Crime, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2021 (AS 2021 360; BBl 2018 6427).

105 SR 121

106 SR 322.1

Art. 269bis Use of special technical devices for the surveillance of telecommunications 107

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may or­der the use of spe­cial tech­nic­al devices for the sur­veil­lance of tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions in or­der to listen to or re­cord con­ver­sa­tions, identi­fy a per­son or prop­erty or de­term­ine their loc­a­tion if:

a.
the re­quire­ments of Art­icle 269 are met;
b.
pre­vi­ous tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions sur­veil­lance meas­ures un­der Art­icle 269 have been un­suc­cess­ful or sur­veil­lance with these meas­ures would be fu­tile or dis­pro­por­tion­ately dif­fi­cult;
c.
the au­thor­isa­tion re­quired un­der tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions law has been ob­tained to use these devices at the time of use.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall keep stat­ist­ics on the use of these forms of sur­veil­lance. The Fed­er­al Coun­cil shall reg­u­late the de­tails.

107 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

Art. 269ter Use of special software for the surveillance of telecommunications 108

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may or­der the in­tro­duc­tion of spe­cial soft­ware in­to a data pro­cessing sys­tem in or­der to in­ter­cept and re­cov­er the con­tent of com­mu­nic­a­tions and tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions metadata in un­en­cryp­ted form provided:

a.
the con­di­tions of Art­icle 269 para­graphs 1 and 3 are met;
b.
the pro­ceed­ings re­late to an of­fence lis­ted in Art­icle 286 para­graph 2;
c.
pre­vi­ous tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions sur­veil­lance meas­ures un­der Art­icle 269 have been un­suc­cess­ful or sur­veil­lance with these meas­ures would be fu­tile or dis­pro­por­tion­ately dif­fi­cult.

2 In the sur­veil­lance or­der, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall spe­cify:

a.
the de­sired data types; and
b.
the non-pub­lic spaces that may have to be entered in or­der to in­tro­duce spe­cial soft­ware in­to the rel­ev­ant data pro­cessing sys­tem.

3 Data not covered by para­graph that is col­lec­ted when us­ing such soft­ware must be des­troyed im­me­di­ately. No use may be made of in­form­a­tion ob­tained from such data.

4 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall keep stat­ist­ics on these forms of sur­veil­lance. The Fed­er­al Coun­cil shall reg­u­late the de­tails.

108 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

Art. 269quater Requirements applicable to special software for the surveillance of telecommunications 109

1 The only spe­cial soft­ware that may be used is that which re­cords the sur­veil­lance un­al­ter­ably and without in­ter­rup­tion. The re­cord forms part of the case files.

2 The re­cov­ery of data from the data pro­cessing sys­tem un­der sur­veil­lance to the rel­ev­ant crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity must take place se­curely.

3 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall en­sure that the source code can be checked in or­der to veri­fy that the soft­ware has only leg­ally per­mit­ted func­tions.

109 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

Art. 270 Subject matter of surveillance

The post and tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions of the fol­low­ing per­sons may be mon­itored:110

a.
the ac­cused;
b.
third parties if there is reas­on to be­lieve based on spe­cif­ic in­form­a­tion that:
1.111
the ac­cused uses the postal ad­dress or the tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice of the third party, or
2.
the third party re­ceives cer­tain com­mu­nic­a­tions on be­half of the ac­cused or passes on com­mu­nic­a­tions from the ac­cused to an­oth­er per­son.

110 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

111 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

Art. 271 Preservation of professional confidentiality 112

1 When mon­it­or­ing a per­son be­long­ing to one of the pro­fes­sions men­tioned in Art­icles 170–173, the court must en­sure that in­form­a­tion that is rel­ev­ant to the en­quir­ies or the reas­on why this per­son is be­ing mon­itored is sep­ar­ated from in­form­a­tion that is rel­ev­ant, in or­der to guar­an­tee that no pro­fes­sion­al secrets come to the know­ledge of the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity. The sep­ar­ated data must be des­troyed im­me­di­ately; it may not be eval­u­ated.

2 In­form­a­tion un­der para­graph 1 need not be sep­ar­ated be­fore­hand if:

a.
there is a strong sus­pi­cion that the per­son sub­ject to pro­fes­sion­al con­fid­en­ti­al­ity is guilty of an of­fence; and
b.
there are spe­cif­ic reas­ons jus­ti­fy­ing the dir­ect in­ter­cep­tion of com­mu­nic­a­tions.

3 In the sur­veil­lance of oth­er per­sons, as soon as it is es­tab­lished that they have links with a per­son men­tioned in Art­icles 170–173, in­form­a­tion on com­mu­nic­a­tion with the per­son must be sep­ar­ated in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 1. In­form­a­tion in re­spect of which a per­son men­tioned in Art­icles 170–173 may re­fuse to testi­fy must be re­moved from the case doc­u­ments and des­troyed im­me­di­ately; it may not be eval­u­ated.

112 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

Art. 272 Duty to obtain authorisation and general authorisation

1 The sur­veil­lance of post and tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions re­quires the au­thor­isa­tion of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court.

2 If en­quir­ies re­veal that the per­son un­der sur­veil­lance is chan­ging his or her tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice reg­u­larly, the com­puls­ory meas­ures court may by way of ex­cep­tion au­thor­ise the sur­veil­lance of all iden­ti­fied ser­vices used by the per­son un­der sur­veil­lance for tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions so that au­thor­isa­tion is not re­quired in each in­di­vidu­al case (gen­er­al au­thor­isa­tion).113 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall sub­mit a re­port to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court for ap­prov­al every month and on con­clu­sion of the sur­veil­lance.

3 If dur­ing the sur­veil­lance of a ser­vice in terms of a gen­er­al au­thor­isa­tion, meas­ures are re­quired to pro­tect pro­fes­sion­al con­fid­en­ti­al­ity and such meas­ures are not men­tioned in the gen­er­al au­thor­isa­tion, an ap­plic­a­tion for au­thor­isa­tion for the in­di­vidu­al sur­veil­lance op­er­a­tion con­cerned must be sub­mit­ted to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court.114

113 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

114 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

Art. 273 Subscriber information, location identification and technical transmission features 115

1 If there is a strong sus­pi­cion that a felony or mis­de­mean­our or a con­tra­ven­tion in terms of Art­icle 179sep­ties SCC116 has been com­mit­ted, and if the re­quire­ments of Art­icle 269 para­graph 1 let­ters b and c of this Code are met, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor may re­quest metadata re­lat­ing to tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 8 let­ter b of the Fed­er­al Act of 18 March 2016117 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic (SPTA) and metadata re­lat­ing to post in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 19 para­graph 1 let­ter b SPTA re­lat­ing to the per­son un­der sur­veil­lance.

2 The or­der re­quires the ap­prov­al of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court.

3 The in­form­a­tion men­tioned in para­graph 1 may be re­ques­ted ir­re­spect­ive of the dur­a­tion of sur­veil­lance and for the 6 months pri­or to the date of the re­quest.

115 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

116 SR 311.0

117 SR 780.1

Art. 274 Authorisation procedure

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall sub­mit the fol­low­ing doc­u­ments to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court with­in 24 hours of sur­veil­lance or the re­lease of in­form­a­tion be­ing ordered:

a.
the or­der;
b.
a state­ment of the reas­ons and the case doc­u­ments rel­ev­ant for au­thor­isa­tion.

2 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall de­cide and provide a brief state­ment of the reas­ons with­in 5 days of the sur­veil­lance or the re­lease of in­form­a­tion be­ing ordered. It may grant au­thor­isa­tion sub­ject to a time lim­it or oth­er con­di­tions, or re­quest fur­ther in­form­a­tion or in­vest­ig­a­tions.

3 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall give no­tice of the de­cision im­me­di­ately to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and to the Post and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Sur­veil­lance Bur­eau in terms of Art­icle 3 SPTA118.119

4 The au­thor­isa­tion shall ex­pressly state:

a.
which meas­ures must be taken to pro­tect pro­fes­sion­al con­fid­en­ti­al­ity;
b.
wheth­er non-pub­lic spaces may be entered in or­der to in­tro­duce spe­cial soft­ware in­to the rel­ev­ant data pro­cessing sys­tem.120

5 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall grant au­thor­isa­tion for a max­im­um of 3 months. The au­thor­isa­tion may be ex­ten­ded on one or more oc­ca­sions for a max­im­um of 3 months at a time. If an ex­ten­sion is re­quired, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall file an ap­plic­a­tion for the ex­ten­sion, stat­ing the reas­ons there­for, be­fore ex­piry of the cur­rent au­thor­isa­tion.

118 SR 780.1

119 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

120 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

Art. 275 Conclusion of surveillance

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall stop sur­veil­lance im­me­di­ately if:

a.
the re­quire­ments are no longer ful­filled; or
b.
the au­thor­isa­tion or its ex­ten­sion is re­fused.

2 In cases un­der para­graph 1 let­ter a, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall no­ti­fy the com­puls­ory meas­ures court that sur­veil­lance has been con­cluded.

Art. 276 Results not required

1 Re­cords of au­thor­ised sur­veil­lance op­er­a­tions that are not re­quired for crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings shall be stored sep­ar­ately from the case doc­u­ments and des­troyed im­me­di­ately on con­clu­sion of the pro­ceed­ings.

2 Postal items may be re­tained for as long as this is ne­ces­sary for the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings; they must be re­leased to the ad­dress­ee as soon as the status of the pro­ceed­ings per­mits.

Art. 277 Use of the results of unauthorised surveillance operations

1 Doc­u­ments and data car­ri­ers ob­tained in un­au­thor­ised sur­veil­lance activ­it­ies must be des­troyed im­me­di­ately. Postal items must be de­livered to the ad­dress­ee im­me­di­ately.

2 The res­ults of un­au­thor­ised sur­veil­lance op­er­a­tions may not be used.

Art. 278 Accidental finds

1 If in the course of sur­veil­lance op­er­a­tions of­fences oth­er than those spe­cified in the sur­veil­lance or­der come to light, these find­ings may be used against the ac­cused provided sur­veil­lance would have been per­mit­ted in the in­vest­ig­a­tion of the of­fences con­cerned.

1bis If of­fences come to light dur­ing sur­veil­lance op­er­a­tions in terms of Art­icles 35 and 36 SPTA121, the find­ings may be used sub­ject to the re­quire­ments spe­cified in para­graphs 2 and 3.122

2 Find­ings re­lat­ing to of­fences com­mit­ted by a per­son who is not named as a sus­pect in the sur­veil­lance or­der may be used if the re­quire­ments for the sur­veil­lance of this per­son are ful­filled.

3 In cases un­der para­graphs 1, 1bis and 2, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall or­der sur­veil­lance im­me­di­ately and be­gin the au­thor­isa­tion pro­ced­ure.123

4 Re­cords that may not be used as ac­ci­dent­al finds must be stored sep­ar­ately from the case doc­u­ments and des­troyed on con­clu­sion of the pro­ceed­ings.

5 Any find­ings made in a sur­veil­lance op­er­a­tion may be used to trace wanted per­sons.

121 SR 780.1

122 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125). Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

123 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125).

Art. 279 Notice

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall no­ti­fy the sus­pect un­der sur­veil­lance and third parties un­der sur­veil­lance in terms of Art­icle 270 let­ter b of the reas­on for and form and dur­a­tion of the sur­veil­lance op­er­a­tion on con­clu­sion of the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings at the latest.

2 With the con­sent of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court, no­tice may be de­ferred or dis­pensed with if:

a.
the find­ings are not used as evid­ence in court pro­ceed­ings; and
b.
de­fer­ring or dis­pens­ing with no­tice is ne­ces­sary to pro­tect over­rid­ing pub­lic or private in­terests.

3 Per­sons whose post or tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions have been un­der sur­veil­lance or who have used a postal ad­dress or tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice that has been un­der sur­veil­lance may file an ob­jec­tion un­der Art­icles 393–397.124 The peri­od for fil­ing the ob­jec­tion be­gins on re­ceipt of the no­tice.

124 Amended by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

Section 2 Surveillance using Technical Surveillance Devices

Art. 280 Permitted use

The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may use tech­nic­al sur­veil­lance devices in or­der to:

a.
listen to or re­cord words spoken in private;
b.
ob­serve or re­cord events in private or not gen­er­ally ac­cess­ible places;
c.
es­tab­lish the where­abouts of per­sons or prop­erty.

Art. 281 Requirements and conduct

1 Devices may only be used in re­la­tion to a sus­pect.

2 Premises or vehicles of third parties may only be mon­itored if there is reas­on to be­lieve on the basis of spe­cif­ic in­form­a­tion that a sus­pect is present on those premises or us­ing that vehicle.

3 Use of devices may not be ordered in or­der to:

a.
re­cord as evid­ence in court pro­ceed­ings events in­volving an ac­cused who is in cus­tody;
b.
mon­it­or premises or vehicles of a third party who be­longs to one of the pro­fes­sions men­tioned in Art­icles 170–173.

4 The use of tech­nic­al sur­veil­lance devices is oth­er­wise gov­erned by Art­icles 269–279.

Section 3 Observation

Art. 282 Requirements

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor and, in the en­quir­ies, the po­lice may cov­ertly ob­serve per­sons and prop­erty in gen­er­ally ac­cess­ible loc­a­tions and make im­age or sound re­cord­ings while do­ing so if:

a.
there is reas­on to be­lieve on the basis of spe­cif­ic in­form­a­tion that felon­ies or mis­de­mean­ours have been com­mit­ted; and
b.
the en­quir­ies would oth­er­wise have no pro­spect of suc­cess or be made un­reas­on­ably com­plic­ated.

2 Where ob­ser­va­tion activ­it­ies ordered by the po­lice have been con­duc­ted for one month, their con­tinu­ation re­quires au­thor­isa­tion by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

Art. 283 Notice

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall no­ti­fy the per­sons dir­ectly con­cerned by ob­ser­va­tion activ­it­ies of the reas­on for and form and dur­a­tion of the ob­ser­va­tion activ­it­ies on con­clu­sion of the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings at the latest.

2 No­tice may be de­ferred or dis­pensed with if:

a.
the find­ings are not used as evid­ence in court pro­ceed­ings; and
b.
de­fer­ring or dis­pens­ing with no­tice is ne­ces­sary to pro­tect over­rid­ing pub­lic or private in­terests.

Section 4 Surveillance of Banking Transactions

Art. 284 Principle

In or­der to in­vest­ig­ate felon­ies or mis­de­mean­ours, the com­puls­ory meas­ures court may, at the re­quest of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, or­der the sur­veil­lance of trans­ac­tions between a sus­pect and a bank or bank-type in­sti­tu­tion.

Art. 285 Conduct

1 If the com­puls­ory meas­ures court au­thor­ises the ap­plic­a­tion, it shall is­sue the bank or bank-type in­sti­tu­tion with writ­ten in­struc­tion on:

a.
the in­form­a­tion and doc­u­ments to be provided
b.
the secrecy meas­ures to be taken.

2 The bank or bank-type in­sti­tu­tion is not re­quired to provide in­form­a­tion or doc­u­ments if in do­ing so it would in­crim­in­ate it­self to the ex­tent that:

a.
it could be con­victed of a crim­in­al of­fence; or
b.
it could be held li­able un­der civil law and if the in­terest to be pro­tec­ted out­weighs the in­terest in pro­sec­u­tion.

3 The ac­count hold­er shall be no­ti­fied of the meas­ure after it has been car­ried out in ac­cord­ance with of Art­icle 279 para­graphs 1 and 2.

4 Per­sons whose bank­ing trans­ac­tions have been mon­itored may file an ob­jec­tion in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 393–397. The peri­od for fil­ing the ob­jec­tion be­gins on re­ceipt of the no­tice.

Section 5 Undercover Investigations125

125 Originally before Art. 286.

Art. 285a Definition 126

In an un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion, po­lice of­ficers or per­sons tem­por­ar­ily ap­poin­ted to carry out po­lice du­ties make con­tact with per­sons un­der false pre­tences by us­ing a false iden­tity (cov­er) sup­por­ted by doc­u­ments with the aim of gain­ing the trust of those per­sons and in­filt­rat­ing a crim­in­al en­vir­on­ment in or­der to in­vest­ig­ate par­tic­u­larly ser­i­ous of­fences.

126 In­ser­ted by No I of the FA of 14 Dec. 2012 on Un­der­cov­er In­vest­ig­a­tions and En­quir­ies, in force since 1 May 2013 (AS 20131051; BBl 201255915609).

Art. 286 Requirements

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may or­der an un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion if:

a.
it is sus­pec­ted that an of­fence lis­ted in para­graph 2 has been com­mit­ted;
b.
the ser­i­ous­ness of the of­fence jus­ti­fies the cov­ert in­vest­ig­a­tion; and
c.
pre­vi­ous in­vest­ig­at­ive activ­it­ies have been un­suc­cess­ful or the en­quir­ies would oth­er­wise have no pro­spect of suc­cess or be made un­reas­on­ably com­plic­ated.

2 An un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion is per­mit­ted in re­spect of of­fences un­der the fol­low­ing Art­icles:

a.127
SCC128: Art­icles 111–113, 122, 124, 129, 135, 138–140, 143 para­graph 1, 144 para­graph 3, 144bis num­ber 1 para­graph 2 and num­ber 2 para­graph 2, 146 para­graphs 1 and 2, 147 para­graphs 1 and 2, 148, 156, 160, 182–185, 187, 188 num­ber 1, 189 para­graphs 1 and 3, 190 para­graphs 1 and 3, 191, 192 para­graph 1, 195, 196, 197 para­graphs 3–5, 221 para­graphs 1 and 2, 223 num­ber 1, 224 para­graph 1, 227 num­ber 1 para­graph 1, 228 num­ber 1 para­graph 1, 230bis, 231 num­ber 1, 232 num­ber 1, 233 num­ber 1, 234 para­graph 1, 237 num­ber 1, 238 para­graph 1, 240 para­graph 1, 242, 244 para­graph 2, 251 num­ber 1, 260bis–260sex­ies, 264–267, 271, 272 num­ber 2, 273, 274 num­ber 1 para­graph 2, 301, 305bis num­ber 2, 310, 322ter, 322quater, 322sep­ties;
b.129
For­eign Na­tion­als and In­teg­ra­tion Act of 16. Decem­ber 2005130: Art­icles 116 para­graph 3 and 118 para­graph 3;
c.
Fed­er­al Act of 22. June 2001131 on the Hag­ue Con­ven­tion on Ad­op­tion and on Meas­ures to Pro­tect Chil­dren in In­ter­na­tion­al Ad­op­tion Cases: Art­icle 24;
d.132
War Ma­ter­i­al Act of 13 Decem­ber 1996133: Art­icles 33 para­graph 2 and 34–35b;
e.
Nuc­le­ar En­ergy Act of 21 March 2003134: Art­icles 88 para­graphs 1 and 2, 89 para­graphs 1 and 2 and 90 para­graph 1;
f.135
Nar­cot­ics Act of 3 Oc­to­ber 1951136: Art­icles 19 num­ber 1 second sen­tence and num­ber 2, and 20 num­ber 1 second sen­tence;
g.
Goods Con­trol Act of 13 Decem­ber 1996137: Art­icle 14 para­graph 2;
h.138
Sport Pro­mo­tion Act of 17 June 2011139: Art­icles 22 para­graph 2 and 25a para­graph 3;
i.140
Weapons Act of 20 June 1997141: Art­icle 33 para­graph 3;
j.142
Medi­cin­al Products Act of 15 Decem­ber 2000143: Art­icle 86 para­graphs 2 and 3;
k.144
Gambling Act of 29 Septem­ber 2017145: Art­icle 130 para­graph 2 for the of­fences un­der Art­icle 130 para­graph 1 let­ter a;
l.146
In­tel­li­gence Ser­vice Act of 25 Septem­ber 2015147: Art­icle 74 para­graph 4.

3 If the ad­ju­dic­a­tion an of­fence sub­ject to mil­it­ary jur­is­dic­tion is as­signed to the jur­is­dic­tion of the civil courts, an un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion may also be ordered in re­spect of of­fences un­der Art­icle 70 para­graph 2 of the Mil­it­ary Crim­in­al Pro­ced­ure Code of 23 March 1979148.

127 Amended by An­nex No II 3 of the FedD of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ap­prov­al and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Coun­cil of Europe Con­ven­tion on the Pre­ven­tion of Ter­ror­ism and its Ad­di­tion­al Pro­tocol and the Strength­en­ing of Crim­in­al Justice In­stru­ments for com­bat­ing Ter­ror­ism and Or­gan­ised Crime, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2021 (AS 2021 360; BBl 2018 6427).

128 SR 311.0

129 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125).

130 SR 142.20

131 SR 211.221.31

132 Amended by No II of the FA of 16 March 2012, in force since 1 Feb. 2013 (AS 2013 295; BBl 20115905).

133 SR 514.51

134 SR 732.1

135 Cor­rec­tion by the Fed­er­al As­sembly Draft­ing Com­mit­tee dated 19 Sept. 2014, pub­lished on 4 Oct. 2014 (AS 2011 4487).

136 SR 812.121

137 SR 946.202

138 In­ser­ted by Art. 34 No 2 of the Sport Pro­mo­tion Act of 17 June 2012 (AS 2012 3953; BBl 2009 8189). Amended by An­nex No II 2 of the Gambling Act of 29 Sept. 2017, in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 5103; BBl 2015 8387).

139 SR 415.0

140 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 1 of the FA of 18 March 2016 on the Sur­veil­lance of Postal and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Traffic, in force since 1 March 2018 (AS 2018 117; BBl 2013 2683).

141 SR 514.54

142 In­ser­ted by An­nex No 1 of the FD of 29 Sept. 2017 (Medicrime Con­ven­tion), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 4771; BBl 2017 3135).

143 SR 812.21

144 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 2 of the Gambling Act of 29 Sept. 2017, in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 5103; BBl 2015 8387).

145 SR 935.51

146 In­ser­ted by An­nex No II 3 of the FedD of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ap­prov­al and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Coun­cil of Europe Con­ven­tion on the Pre­ven­tion of Ter­ror­ism and its Ad­di­tion­al Pro­tocol and the Strength­en­ing of Crim­in­al Justice In­stru­ments for com­bat­ing Ter­ror­ism and Or­gan­ised Crime, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2021 (AS 2021 360; BBl 2018 6427).

147 SR 121

148 SR 322.1

Art. 287 Requirements for the persons deployed

1 The fol­low­ing per­sons may be de­ployed as un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­ors:

a.
mem­bers of a Swiss or for­eign po­lice force;
b.
per­sons em­ployed tem­por­ar­ily on po­lice du­ties even if they have not re­ceived po­lice train­ing.

2 Only mem­bers of a po­lice force may be de­ployed as com­mand staff.

3 If mem­bers of a for­eign po­lice force are de­ployed, they are nor­mally led by their reg­u­lar com­mand­er.

Art. 288 Cover and guarantee of anonymity

1 The po­lice shall provide un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­ors with a cov­er.149

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may guar­an­tee to un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­ors that their true iden­tity will not be re­vealed even if they ap­pear in court pro­ceed­ings as a per­son provid­ing in­form­a­tion or as a wit­ness.150

2 It may guar­an­tee to un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­ors that their true iden­tity will not be dis­closed even if they ap­pear in court pro­ceed­ings as per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion or wit­nesses.

3 If un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­ors com­mit an of­fence while de­ployed, the com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall de­cide on the iden­tity un­der which crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings are brought.

149 Amended by No I of the FA of 14 Dec. 2012 on Un­der­cov­er In­vest­ig­a­tions and En­quir­ies, in force since 1 May 2013 (AS 20131051; BBl 201255915609).

150 Amended by No I of the FA of 14 Dec. 2012 on Un­der­cov­er In­vest­ig­a­tions and En­quir­ies, in force since 1 May 2013 (AS 20131051; BBl 201255915609).

Art. 289 Authorisation procedure

1 The de­ploy­ment of an un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or re­quires the au­thor­isa­tion of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall sub­mit the fol­low­ing doc­u­ments to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court with­in 24 hours of or­der­ing the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion:

a.
the or­der;
b.
a state­ment of the reas­ons and the case doc­u­ments rel­ev­ant for au­thor­isa­tion.

3 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall de­cide and provide a brief state­ment of the reas­ons with­in 5 days of the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion be­ing ordered. It may grant au­thor­isa­tion sub­ject to a time lim­it or oth­er con­di­tions, or re­quest fur­ther in­form­a­tion or in­vest­ig­a­tions.

4 The au­thor­isa­tion shall ex­pressly state wheth­er it is per­mit­ted:

a.
to pro­duce or al­ter of­fi­cial doc­u­ments in or­der to cre­ate or main­tain a cov­er;
b.
to guar­an­tee an­onym­ity;
c.
to de­ploy per­sons with no po­lice train­ing.

5 The com­puls­ory meas­ures court shall grant au­thor­isa­tion for a max­im­um of 12 months. Au­thor­isa­tion may be ex­ten­ded on one or more oc­ca­sions for a max­im­um of 6 months at a time. If an ex­ten­sion is re­quired, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall file an ap­plic­a­tion for the ex­ten­sion, stat­ing the reas­ons there­for, be­fore ex­piry of the cur­rent au­thor­isa­tion.

6 If au­thor­isa­tion is not gran­ted or no au­thor­isa­tion has been ob­tained, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall ter­min­ate de­ploy­ment im­me­di­ately. All re­cords must be des­troyed im­me­di­ately. Find­ings made by means of the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion may not be used.

Art. 290 Briefing before deployment

The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall brief the com­mand­ing of­ficer and the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or be­fore de­ploy­ment.

Art. 291 Commanding officer

1 Dur­ing de­ploy­ment, the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or is sub­ject to the dir­ect in­struc­tions of the com­mand­ing of­ficer. Dur­ing de­ploy­ment, any con­tact between the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or shall take place ex­clus­ively via the com­mand­ing of­ficer.

2 The com­mand­ing of­ficer has the fol­low­ing du­ties in par­tic­u­lar:

a.
he or she shall brief the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or in de­tail and con­tinu­ously on the as­sign­ment and powers and on how to deal with the cov­er story.
b.
he or she shall in­struct and ad­vise the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or and con­tinu­ally as­sess the risk situ­ation.
c.
he or she shall keep a writ­ten re­cord of or­al re­ports made by the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or and a full dossier on the op­er­a­tion.
d.
he or she shall in­form the pub­lic pro­sec­utor reg­u­larly and in full on the op­er­a­tion.

Art. 292 Duties of undercover investigators

1 Un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­ors shall carry out their op­er­a­tion in ac­cord­ance their du­ties and in line with their in­struc­tions.

2 They shall re­port to their com­mand­ing of­ficer reg­u­larly and in full on their activ­it­ies and their find­ings.

Art. 293 Scope of influence permitted

1 Un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­ors may not gen­er­ally en­cour­age oth­ers to com­mit of­fences or in­cite per­sons already will­ing to com­mit of­fences to com­mit more ser­i­ous of­fences. They must lim­it their activ­it­ies to sub­stan­ti­at­ing an ex­ist­ing de­cision to com­mit an of­fence.

2 Their activ­it­ies may only be of minor sig­ni­fic­ance in the de­cision to com­mit a spe­cif­ic of­fence.

3 If re­quired in or­der to bring about the main trans­ac­tion, they may make tri­al pur­chases or provide evid­ence of their abil­ity to pay.

4 If the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or ex­ceeds the re­mit of the au­thor­ised op­er­a­tion, the court must take due ac­count of this in as­sess­ing the sen­tence im­posed on the per­son sub­ject to the in­vest­ig­at­or's in­flu­ence, or may dis­pense with im­pos­ing any sen­tence.

Art. 294 Deployment in investigations under the Narcotics Act

Un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­ors may not be con­victed of an of­fence un­der Art­icles 19 and 20–22 of the Nar­cot­ics Act of 3 Oc­to­ber 1951151 if they are act­ing in the course of an au­thor­ised un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion.

Art. 295 Money for simulated transactions

1 At the re­quest of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the Con­fed­er­a­tion may provide sums of money via the Na­tion­al Bank in the re­quired amounts, forms and de­nom­in­a­tions for the pur­pose of sim­u­lated trans­ac­tions and to provide evid­ence of an abil­ity to pay.

2 The re­quest must be sub­mit­ted to the Fed­er­al Of­fice of Po­lice to­geth­er with a sum­mary of the facts of the case.

3 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall take the pre­cau­tions re­quired to pro­tect the money provided. In the event of loss, the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton to which pub­lic pro­sec­utor be­longs is li­able.

Art. 296 Accidental finds

1 Where evid­ence of an of­fence oth­er than that named in the in­vest­ig­a­tion or­der comes to light in the course of an un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion, the evid­ence may be used provided the or­der­ing of a cov­ert in­vest­ig­a­tion would have been per­mit­ted in or­der to in­vest­ig­ate the of­fence newly dis­closed.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall or­der an un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion im­me­di­ately and be­gin the au­thor­isa­tion pro­ced­ure.

Art. 297 Conclusion of the operation

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall ter­min­ate the op­er­a­tion im­me­di­ately if:

a.
the re­quire­ments are no longer met;
b.
au­thor­isa­tion or an ex­ten­sion there­of is re­fused; or
c.
the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or or the com­mand­ing of­ficer fails to fol­low in­struc­tions or fails to carry out his or her du­ties in some oth­er way, in par­tic­u­lar by wil­fully provid­ing false in­form­a­tion to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

2 In cases un­der para­graph 1 let­ters a and c, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall no­ti­fy the com­puls­ory meas­ures court of the ter­min­a­tion of the op­er­a­tion.

3 When ter­min­at­ing an op­er­a­tion, it must be en­sured that neither the un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­at­or nor any third parties in­volved in the in­vest­ig­a­tion are ex­posed to any avoid­able risks.

Art. 298 Notice

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall give no­tice to the ac­cused at the latest on con­clu­sion of the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings that he or she has been the sub­ject of an un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion.

2 No­tice may be de­ferred or dis­pensed with, sub­ject to the con­sent of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court, if:

a.
the find­ings are not used as evid­ence; and
b.
de­fer­ring or dis­pens­ing with no­tice is ne­ces­sary to pro­tect over­rid­ing pub­lic or private in­terests.

3 Per­sons who have been the sub­ject of an un­der­cov­er in­vest­ig­a­tion may file an ob­jec­tion in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 393–397. The peri­od for fil­ing the ob­jec­tion be­gins on re­ceipt of no­tice of the in­vest­ig­a­tion.

Section 5a Undercover Enquiries152

152 Inserted by No I of the FA of 14 Dec. 2012 on Undercover Investigations and Enquiries, in force since 1 May 2013 (AS 20131051; BBl 201255915609).

Art. 298a Definition

1 In un­der­cov­er en­quir­ies, po­lice of­ficers de­ployed for short peri­ods in such a way that their true iden­tity and func­tion re­mains con­cealed at­tempt to in­vest­ig­ate felon­ies and mis­de­mean­ours and to do so enter in­to or pre­tend that they wish to enter in­to fic­ti­tious trans­ac­tions.

2 Un­der­cov­er agents are not provided with a cov­er with­in the mean­ing of Art­icle 285a. Their true iden­tity and func­tion is dis­closed in the case files and at hear­ings.

Art. 298b Requirements

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor and, dur­ing po­lice en­quir­ies, the po­lice may or­der un­der­cov­er en­quir­ies if:

a.
it is sus­pec­ted that a felony or mis­de­mean­our has been com­mit­ted; and
b.
pre­vi­ous en­quir­ies or in­vest­ig­a­tions have been un­suc­cess­ful or the en­quir­ies would oth­er­wise have little pro­spect of suc­cess or would be made dis­pro­por­tion­ately more com­plex.

2 If un­der­cov­er en­quir­ies ordered by the po­lice have been car­ried out for one month, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor must ap­prove their con­tinu­ation.

Art. 298c Requirements for the persons deployed and conduct

1 Art­icle 287 ap­plies mu­tatis mutandis to the per­sons de­ployed. The de­ploy­ment of per­sons in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 287 para­graph 1 let­ter b is not per­mit­ted.

2 Art­icles 291–294 ap­ply by ana­logy to the status, du­ties and ob­lig­a­tions of the un­der­cov­er agents and their com­mand­ing of­ficers.

Art. 298d Termination and notification

1 The po­lice unit or pub­lic pro­sec­utor re­spons­ible shall ter­min­ate the un­der­cov­er en­quir­ies im­me­di­ately if:

a.
the re­quire­ments there­for are no longer met;
b.
pub­lic pro­sec­utor fails to ap­prove the con­tinu­ation of en­quir­ies ordered by the po­lice; or
c.
the un­der­cov­er agent or com­mand­ing of­ficer does not fol­low in­struc­tion or fails to ful­fil his or her ob­lig­a­tions in an­oth­er way, in par­tic­u­lar by provid­ing the pub­lic pro­sec­utor with false in­form­a­tion or at­tempt­ing to in­flu­ence the tar­get per­son in an un­law­ful man­ner.

2 The po­lice shall no­ti­fy the pub­lic pro­sec­utor of the ter­min­a­tion of un­der­cov­er en­quir­ies.

3 When ter­min­at­ing un­der­cov­er en­quir­ies, care should be taken to en­sure that the un­der­cov­er agent is not ex­posed to any avoid­able risk.

4 No­ti­fic­a­tion of un­der­cov­er en­quir­ies is gov­erned by Art­icle 298 para­graphs 1 and 3 mu­tatis mutandis.

Title 6 Preliminary Proceedings

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Art. 299 Definition and purpose

1 The pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings com­prise the po­lice en­quir­ies and the in­vest­ig­a­tion by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

2 In the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings, based on the sus­pi­cion that an of­fence has been com­mit­ted, en­quir­ies shall be car­ried out and evid­ence gathered in or­der to es­tab­lish wheth­er:

a.
a sum­mary pen­alty or­der should be is­sued to the ac­cused;
b.
charges should be brought against the ac­cused;
c.
the pro­ceed­ings should be aban­doned.

Art. 300 Commencement

1 Pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings com­mence when:

a.
en­quir­ies are be­gun by the po­lice;
b.
an in­vest­ig­a­tion is opened by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

2 The com­mence­ment of pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings may not be con­tested un­less the ac­cused claims it con­sti­tutes a vi­ol­a­tion of the rule against double jeop­ardy.

Art. 301 Right to report an offence

1 Any per­son is en­titled to re­port an of­fence to a crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity in writ­ing or or­ally.

2 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall if re­ques­ted no­ti­fy the per­son mak­ing the re­port of wheth­er crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings are be­ing com­menced and how they are pro­ceed­ing.

3 A per­son mak­ing a re­port who has neither suffered loss nor in­jury nor is a private claimant has no fur­ther pro­ced­ur­al rights.

Art. 302 Duty to report

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies are ob­liged to re­port to the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity all of­fences that have come to light or that have been re­por­ted to them in the course of their of­fi­cial activ­it­ies, un­less they them­selves are re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing the of­fence.

2 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall reg­u­late the duty to re­port of mem­bers of oth­er au­thor­it­ies.

3 The duty to re­port ceases to ap­ply for per­sons who have the right to re­main si­lent or to re­fuse to testi­fy in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 113 para­graph 1, 168, 169 and 180 para­graph 1.

Art. 303 Offences prosecuted on complaint or with official authorisation

1 In the case of of­fences that are pro­sec­uted only on com­plaint or with of­fi­cial au­thor­isa­tion, pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings shall be com­menced only if a crim­in­al com­plaint has been made or au­thor­isa­tion gran­ted.

2 The com­pet­ent au­thor­ity may act to se­cure evid­ence be­fore­hand where this can­not be delayed.

Art. 304 Form of the criminal complaint

1 A crim­in­al com­plaint must be sub­mit­ted in writ­ing or made or­ally and noted down in an of­fi­cial re­cord. It must be made to the po­lice, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions.

2 Where a per­son waives the right to file a com­plaint or with­draws a com­plaint, the same form is re­quired.

Art. 305 Information and referral for the victim 153154

1 The po­lice and the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall in­form the vic­tim in full at their first ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing of his or her rights and ob­lig­a­tions in the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings.

2 They shall at the same time in­form the vic­tim of:155

a.
the ad­dresses and ser­vices provided by vic­tim coun­selling ser­vices;
b.
the pos­sib­il­ity of claim­ing vari­ous vic­tim sup­port be­ne­fits;
c.
the time lim­it for the fil­ing claims for dam­ages and sat­is­fac­tion;
d.156
the right un­der Art­icle 92a SCC to re­quest in­form­a­tion on the de­cisions and and cir­cum­stances of the ex­e­cu­tion of pen­al­ties and meas­ure in re­la­tion to the of­fend­er.

3 If the vic­tim agrees, they shall pass his or her name and ad­dress on to a coun­selling ser­vice.

4 Para­graphs 1–3 also ap­ply mu­tatis mutandis to the re­l­at­ives of the vic­tim.

5 Con­firm­a­tion that the pro­vi­sions this Art­icle have been com­plied with must be re­cor­ded in the case file.

153 Amended by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010, in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125).

154 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 26 Sept. 2014 on Vic­tims’ Right to In­form­a­tion, in force since 1 Jan. 2016 (AS 2015 1623; BBl 2014 889913).

155 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 26 Sept. 2014 on Vic­tims’ Right to In­form­a­tion, in force since 1 Jan. 2016 (AS 2015 1623; BBl 2014 889913).

156 In­ser­ted by No I 3 of the FA of 26 Sept. 2014 on Vic­tims’ Right to In­form­a­tion, in force since 1 Jan. 2016 (AS 2015 1623; BBl 2014 889913).

Chapter 2 Police Enquiries

Art. 306 Duties of the police

1 The po­lice shall in the course of their en­quir­ies es­tab­lish the facts rel­ev­ant to an of­fence on the basis of re­ports, in­struc­tions from the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or their find­ings.

2 They must in par­tic­u­lar:

a.
se­cure and eval­u­ate forensic and oth­er evid­ence;
b.
identi­fy and in­ter­view per­sons suf­fer­ing harm and sus­pects;
c.
if ne­ces­sary, stop and ar­rest or at­tempt to trace sus­pects.

3 Their activ­it­ies are gov­erned by the reg­u­la­tions on in­vest­ig­a­tions, evid­ence and com­puls­ory meas­ures, sub­ject to the spe­cial pro­vi­sions of this Code.

Art. 307 Cooperation with the public prosecutor

1 The po­lice shall in­form the pub­lic pro­sec­utor im­me­di­ately of ser­i­ous of­fences and oth­er ser­i­ous in­cid­ents. The fed­er­al and can­ton­al pub­lic pro­sec­utors may is­sue more de­tailed pro­vi­sions on this duty to provide in­form­a­tion.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may is­sue in­struc­tions and as­sign­ments to the po­lice at any time or take over the con­duct of the pro­ceed­ings. In the cases un­der para­graph 1, it shall if pos­sible con­duct the first es­sen­tial ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings it­self.

3 The po­lice shall re­cord all their find­ings and the meas­ures they have taken in writ­ten re­ports and pass these on con­clu­sion of their en­quir­ies to­geth­er with the re­ports of of­fences, tran­scripts of ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings, oth­er files and prop­erty and as­sets that have been seized dir­ectly to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

4 They may dis­pense with mak­ing a re­port if:

a.
there is clearly no need for the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to take fur­ther pro­ceed­ings; and
b.
no com­puls­ory meas­ures or oth­er form­al en­quir­ies have been car­ried out.

Chapter 3 Investigation by the Public Prosecutor

Section 1 Duties of the Public Prosecutor

Art. 308 Definition and purpose of the investigation

1 In the in­vest­ig­a­tion, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall cla­ri­fy the fac­tu­al and leg­al as­pects of the case in or­der that it may con­clude the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings.

2 If it is an­ti­cip­ated that charges will be brought or a sum­mary pen­alty or­der is­sued, it shall cla­ri­fy the per­son­al cir­cum­stances of the ac­cused.

3 If charges are to be brought, the in­vest­ig­a­tion must provide the court with the ba­sic in­form­a­tion re­quired to as­sess the guilt of the ac­cused and to im­pose a sen­tence.

Art. 309 Opening the investigation

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall open an in­vest­ig­a­tion if:

a.
there is a reas­on­able sus­pi­cion that an of­fence has been com­mit­ted based on the in­form­a­tion and re­ports from the po­lice, the com­plaint or its own find­ings;
b.
it in­tends to or­der com­puls­ory meas­ures;
c.
it has re­ceived in­form­a­tion from the po­lice in terms of Art­icle 307 para­graph 1.

2 It may re­turn po­lice re­ports and crim­in­al com­plaints that do not con­tain clear in­dic­a­tions that an of­fence has been com­mit­ted to the po­lice so that they may carry out ad­di­tion­al en­quir­ies.

3 It shall open the in­vest­ig­a­tion by is­su­ing a rul­ing in which it shall name the ac­cused and the of­fence that he or she is sus­pec­ted of com­mit­ting. The rul­ing need not con­tain a state­ment of reas­ons or be made pub­lic. It is non-con­test­able.

4 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may not open an in­vest­ig­a­tion if it im­me­di­ately is­sues a no-pro­ceed­ings or­der or a sum­mary pen­alty or­der.

Art. 310 No-proceedings order

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall rule that no pro­ceed­ings be taken as soon as it is es­tab­lished on the basis of the com­plaint or the po­lice re­port that:

a.
the ele­ments of the of­fence con­cerned or the pro­ced­ur­al re­quire­ments have clearly not been ful­filled;
b.
there are pro­ced­ur­al im­ped­i­ments;
c.
there should be no pro­sec­u­tion for the reas­ons stated in Art­icle 8.

2 The pro­ced­ure is oth­er­wise gov­erned by the pro­vi­sions on abandon­ing pro­ceed­ings.

Section 2 Conduct of the Investigation

Art. 311 Gathering of evidence and extending the investigation

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utors shall gath­er the evid­ence them­selves. The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall de­cide on the ex­tent to which they may del­eg­ate spe­cif­ic in­vest­ig­at­ive activ­it­ies to their staff.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may ex­tend the in­vest­ig­a­tion to in­clude ad­di­tion­al per­sons or of­fences. Art­icle 309 para­graph 3 ap­plies.

Art. 312 Assignments given by the public prosecutor to the police

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may in­struct the po­lice to carry out ad­di­tion­al en­quir­ies after the in­vest­ig­a­tion has been opened. It shall is­sue writ­ten in­struc­tions, or in cases of ur­gency or­al in­struc­tions, that lim­it the en­quir­ies to clearly defined is­sues.

2 In the case of ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings car­ried out by the po­lice on be­half of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the per­sons in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings have the pro­ced­ur­al rights that they would be ac­cor­ded in the case of ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

Art. 313 Taking evidence for civil claims

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall gath­er the evid­ence re­quired to as­sess the civil claim provided the pro­ceed­ings are not un­duly ex­ten­ded or delayed thereby.

2 It may the make the gath­er­ing of evid­ence that primar­ily serves to fur­ther the civil claim con­di­tion­al on an ad­vance pay­ment by the private claimant to cov­er costs.

Art. 314 Suspension

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may sus­pend an in­vest­ig­a­tion, in par­tic­u­lar if:

a.
the iden­tity of the of­fend­er or his or her where­abouts is un­known is or there are oth­er tem­por­ary pro­ced­ur­al im­ped­i­ments;
b.
the out­come of the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings de­pends on oth­er pro­ceed­ings and it seems ap­pro­pri­ate to await their con­clu­sion;
c.
private set­tle­ment pro­ceed­ings are on­go­ing and it seems ap­pro­pri­ate to await their out­come;
d.
a de­cision on the sub­stance of the case de­pends on how the con­sequences of the of­fence de­vel­op.

2 In the case of para­graph 1 let­ter c, the peri­od of sus­pen­sion shall be lim­ited to 3 months; it may be ex­ten­ded on one oc­ca­sion by a fur­ther 3 months.

3 Be­fore sus­pend­ing pro­ceed­ings, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall gath­er any evid­ence that is at risk of be­ing lost. If the iden­tity of the of­fend­er or his or her where­abouts is un­known, it shall or­der that he or she be traced.

4 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall give no­tice of the sus­pen­sion to the ac­cused, the private claimant and the vic­tims.

5 The pro­ced­ure is oth­er­wise gov­erned by the pro­vi­sions on the aban­don­ment of pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 315 Resumption of proceedings

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall re­sume a sus­pen­ded in­vest­ig­a­tion ex of­fi­cio if the grounds for sus­pen­sion no longer ap­ply.

2 A de­cision to re­sume pro­ceed­ings may not be con­tested.

Section 3 Private Settlements

Art. 316

1 Where the pro­ceed­ings re­late to an of­fence that is pro­sec­uted only on com­plaint, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor may sum­mon the com­plain­ant and the ac­cused to a hear­ing with the aim of achiev­ing a set­tle­ment. If the com­plain­ant fails to at­tend, the com­plaint is deemed to have been with­drawn.

2 If con­sid­er­a­tion is be­ing giv­en to an ex­emp­tion from pun­ish­ment due to re­par­a­tion be­ing made in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 53 SCC157, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall in­vite the per­son suf­fer­ing harm and the ac­cused to a hear­ing with the aim of agree­ing on re­par­a­tion.

3 If an agree­ment is reached, this shall be placed on re­cord and signed by those in­volved. The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall then aban­don the pro­ceed­ings.

4 If the ac­cused fails to at­tend a hear­ing in ac­cord­ance with para­graphs 1 or 2 or if no agree­ment is reached, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall im­me­di­ately pro­ceed with the in­vest­ig­a­tion. In cases where it is jus­ti­fied, it may re­quire the com­plain­ant to provide se­cur­ity for costs and dam­ages with­in ten days.

Section 4 Conclusion of the Investigation

Art. 317 Final examination hearing

In ex­tens­ive and com­plex pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall ques­tion the ac­cused again in a fi­nal ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing be­fore con­clud­ing the in­vest­ig­a­tion and re­quest the ac­cused to com­ment on the find­ings.

Art. 318 Conclusion

1 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor re­gards the in­vest­ig­a­tion as com­pleted, it shall is­sue a sum­mary pen­alty or­der or give writ­ten no­tice to those parties whose ad­dress is known of the im­min­ent con­clu­sion of the in­vest­ig­a­tion and in­form them wheth­er it is in­ten­ded to bring charges or aban­don the pro­ceed­ings. At the same time, it shall al­low the parties a peri­od with­in which to sub­mit re­quests for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken.

2 It may re­ject re­quests for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken only if the evid­ence in­volves mat­ters that are ir­rel­ev­ant, ob­vi­ous, known to the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity or already sat­is­fact­or­ily proven in leg­al terms. The de­cision shall be is­sued in writ­ing and with a brief state­ment of the grounds. Re­quests for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken that are re­fused may be made again in the main pro­ceed­ings.

3 No­tice in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 1 and de­cisions in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 2 are non-con­test­able.

Chapter 4 Abandoning Proceedings and Bringing Charges

Section 1 Abandoning Proceedings

Art. 319 Grounds

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall or­der the com­plete or par­tial aban­don­ment of the pro­ceed­ings if:

a.
no sus­pi­cions are sub­stan­ti­ated that jus­ti­fy bring­ing charges;
b.
the con­duct does not ful­fil the ele­ments of an of­fence;
c.
grounds jus­ti­fy­ing the con­duct mean that it does not con­sti­tute an of­fence;
d.
it is im­possible to ful­fil the pro­ced­ur­al re­quire­ments or pro­ced­ur­al im­ped­i­ments have aris­en;
e.
a stat­utory reg­u­la­tion ap­plies that per­mit the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to dis­pense with bring­ing charges or im­pos­ing a pen­alty.

2 It may also aban­don the pro­ceed­ings by way of ex­cep­tion if:

a.
this is es­sen­tial in the in­terests of a vic­tim who was un­der the age of 18 at the time of the of­fence and this in­terest clearly over­rides the in­terest of the state in a pro­sec­u­tion; and
b.
the vic­tim or in the event that the vic­tim lacks leg­al ca­pa­city, his or her leg­al agent con­sents to the aban­don­ment.

Art. 320 Ruling abandoning proceedings

1 The form and gen­er­al con­tent of the rul­ing abandon­ing pro­ceed­ings are gov­erned by Art­icles 80 and 81.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall re­voke ex­ist­ing com­puls­ory meas­ures in the rul­ing abandon­ing pro­ceed­ings. It may or­der the for­feit­ure of prop­erty and as­sets.

3 Civil claims are not ad­dressed in the rul­ing abandon­ing pro­ceed­ings. A private claimant may take civil ac­tion after the rul­ing be­comes leg­ally bind­ing.

4 A leg­ally bind­ing rul­ing abandon­ing pro­ceed­ings is equi­val­ent to a fi­nal ver­dict of ac­quit­tal.

Art. 321 Notice

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall give no­tice of the rul­ing abandon­ing pro­ceed­ings to:

a.
the parties;
b.
the vic­tim;
c.
the oth­er per­sons in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings af­fected by the rul­ing;
d.
any oth­er au­thor­it­ies des­ig­nated by the can­tons provided they have a right of ap­peal.

2 The fore­go­ing is sub­ject to the ex­press waiver of any per­son in­volved in the pro­ceed­ings.

3 Art­icles 84–88 are oth­er­wise ap­plic­able mu­tatis mutandis.

Art. 322 Approval and rights of appeal

1 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons may stip­u­late that the rul­ing abandon­ing pro­ceed­ings be ap­proved by the Of­fice of the Chief Can­ton­al Pro­sec­utor.

2 The parties may con­test the rul­ing abandon­ing pro­ceed­ings with the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity with­in 10 days.

Art. 323 Reopening of proceedings

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall or­der the re­open­ing of pro­ceed­ings that have been aban­doned by a leg­ally-bind­ing rul­ing if it ob­tains new evid­ence or in­form­a­tion that:

a.
in­dic­ates that the ac­cused is guilty of a crim­in­al of­fence; and
b.
does not res­ult from the pre­vi­ous files.

2 It shall give no­tice of the re­open­ing of pro­ceed­ings to the per­sons and au­thor­it­ies that pre­vi­ously re­ceived no­tice of the aban­don­ment.

Section 2 Bringing Charges

Art. 324 Principles

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall bring charges in the com­pet­ent court if, based on the res­ults of the in­vest­ig­a­tion, it re­gards the grounds for sus­pi­cion as suf­fi­cient and it is not com­pet­ent to is­sue a sum­mary pen­alty or­der.

2 The bring­ing of charges is non-con­test­able.

Art. 325 Content of the indictment

1 The in­dict­ment shall in­dic­ate:

a.
the place and the date;
b.
the pub­lic pro­sec­utor bring­ing the charges;
c.
the court com­pet­ent to hear the charges;
d.
the ac­cused and his or her de­fence law­yer;
e.
the per­son suf­fer­ing harm;
f.
as briefly but pre­cisely as pos­sible: the acts that the ac­cused is al­leged to have com­mit­ted with de­tails of the locus, date, time, nature and con­sequences of their com­mis­sion;
g.
the of­fences that are in the opin­ion of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor con­sti­tuted by these acts with de­tails of the ap­plic­able stat­utory pro­vi­sions.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may bring al­tern­at­ive charges or sec­ond­ary charges for the event that the main charges are dis­missed.

Art. 326 Further information and applications

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall provide the court with the fol­low­ing de­tails and make the fol­low­ing ap­plic­a­tions un­less they are already in­cluded in the in­dict­ment:

a.
the private claimant and any civil claims;
b.
the com­puls­ory meas­ures ordered;
c.
the seized prop­erty and as­sets;
d.
the costs in­curred in the in­vest­ig­a­tion;
e.
if deemed ne­ces­sary, its ap­plic­a­tion for pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion;
f.
its ap­plic­a­tions for sanc­tions or no­tice that these ap­plic­a­tions will be made at the main hear­ing;
g.
its ap­plic­a­tions for sub­sequent ju­di­cial de­cisions;
h.
its re­quest to re­ceive a sum­mons to the main hear­ing.

2 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor is not per­son­ally rep­res­en­ted in court, it may at­tach a fi­nal re­port to the in­dict­ment that ex­plains the cir­cum­stances of the case, which also con­tains com­ments on the as­sess­ment of evid­ence.

Art. 327 Service of the indictment

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall im­me­di­ately serve the in­dict­ment to­geth­er with any fi­nal re­port:

a.
on the ac­cused, provided his or her where­abouts is known;
b.
on the private claimant;
c.
on the vic­tim;
d.
on the com­pet­ent court, to­geth­er with the files and the seized prop­erty and as­sets.

2 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor ap­plies for an or­der of pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion, when fil­ing the rel­ev­ant ap­plic­a­tion, it shall also serve a copy of the in­dict­ment on the com­puls­ory meas­ures court.

Title 7 Main Proceedings of First Instance

Chapter 1 Pending Status, Preparation for the Main Hearing, General Provisions on the Main Hearing

Art. 328 Pending status

1 On re­ceipt of the in­dict­ment, the pro­ceed­ings be­come pending be­fore the court.

2 When the pro­ceed­ings be­come pending, au­thor­ity over the pro­ceed­ings passes to the court.

Art. 329 Examination of the indictment; suspension and abandonment of the proceedings

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall ex­am­ine wheth­er:

a.
the in­dict­ment and the files have been presen­ted in the prop­er man­ner;
b.
the pro­ced­ur­al re­quire­ments are ful­filled;
c.
there are any pro­ced­ur­al im­ped­i­ments.

2 If it is de­term­ined in this ex­am­in­a­tion or later in the pro­ceed­ings that a judg­ment can­not be is­sued at this time, the court shall sus­pend the pro­ceed­ings. If re­quired, it shall re­turn the in­dict­ment to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor for amend­ment or cor­rec­tion.

3 The court shall de­cide wheth­er a sus­pen­ded case re­mains pending be­fore it.

4 If it is per­man­ently im­possible to is­sue a judg­ment, the court shall aban­don the pro­ceed­ings after grant­ing the parties and oth­er third parties ad­versely af­fected by aban­don­ment the right to be heard. Art­icle 320 ap­plies mu­tatis mutandis.

5 If the pro­ceed­ings are only aban­doned in re­la­tion to spe­cif­ic charges on the in­dict­ment aban­doned, the aban­don­ment or­der may be is­sued with the judg­ment.

Art. 330 Preparation for the main hearing

1 If the charges are to be con­sidered, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall im­me­di­ately is­sue the or­ders re­quired for the main hear­ing to be con­duc­ted.

2 In the case of courts with two or more judges on the bench, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall cir­cu­late the files.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall in­form the vic­tim of his or her rights, un­less the pro­sec­u­tion au­thor­it­ies have already done so; Art­icle 305 ap­plies mu­tatis mutandis.

Art. 331 Scheduling the main hearing

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall de­cide on the evid­ence that may be taken at the main hear­ing. He or she shall no­ti­fy the parties of the com­pos­i­tion of the court and what evid­ence is to be presen­ted.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall at the same time set a dead­line with­in which the parties must sub­mit and jus­ti­fy re­quests for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken; when do­ing so, he or she shall no­ti­fy the parties of the po­ten­tial ef­fect on costs and dam­ages of delayed re­quests for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken.

3 If the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings re­jects a re­quest for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken, he or she shall no­ti­fy the parties of this and give a brief state­ment of the grounds. Re­jec­tion is non-con­test­able, but re­jec­ted re­quests for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken may be sub­mit­ted again at the main hear­ing.

4 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall fix a date, time and place for the main hear­ing and sum­mon the parties, to­geth­er with the wit­nesses, per­sons provid­ing in­form­a­tion and ex­pert wit­nesses who are to be ques­tioned.

5 He or she shall make a fi­nal de­cision on ap­plic­a­tions for post­pone­ment that are sub­mit­ted be­fore the start of the main hear­ing.

Art. 332 Preliminary hearings

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may sum­mon the parties to a pre­lim­in­ary hear­ing in or­der to settle or­gan­isa­tion­al is­sues.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may sum­mon the parties to dis­cuss a private set­tle­ment in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 316.

3 If it is ex­pec­ted that it will not be pos­sible to take cer­tain evid­ence in the main hear­ing, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may take that evid­ence pri­or to the main hear­ing, en­trust the task to a del­eg­ate of the court or in cases of ur­gency to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, or ar­range for the evid­ence to be taken through mu­tu­al as­sist­ance pro­ced­ures. The parties shall be giv­en the op­por­tun­ity to par­ti­cip­ate if evid­ence is taken in this way.

Art. 333 Amending and adding charges

1 The court shall al­low the pub­lic pro­sec­utor the op­por­tun­ity to amend the charges if in its view the cir­cum­stances out­lined in the in­dict­ment could con­sti­tute a dif­fer­ent of­fence but the in­dict­ment does not meet the stat­utory re­quire­ments.

2 If fur­ther of­fences by the ac­cused come to light dur­ing the main hear­ing, the court may per­mit the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to add charges to the in­dict­ment.

3 Ad­di­tions are not per­mit­ted if the pro­ceed­ings would be made un­duly com­plex or this would af­fect the jur­is­dic­tion of the court or if a case in­volves co-of­fend­ing or par­ti­cip­a­tion. In these cases, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall com­mence pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings.

4 The court may only base its judg­ment on a charge that has been amended or ad­ded to if the party rights of the ac­cused and the private claimant have been ob­served. If ne­ces­sary, it shall ad­journ the main hear­ing.

Art. 334 Transfer

1 If the court con­cludes that in pro­ceed­ings pending be­fore it a sen­tence or meas­ure must be con­sidered that ex­ceeds its com­pet­ence, it shall trans­fer the case at the latest fol­low­ing the party sub­mis­sions to the com­pet­ent court. This court shall con­duct its own pro­ced­ure for tak­ing evid­ence.

2 The de­cision to trans­fer the case to an­oth­er court is non-con­test­able.

Chapter 2 Conduct of the Main Hearing

Section 1 Court and Persons involved in the Proceedings

Art. 335 Composition of the court

1 The court shall sit for the en­tire dur­a­tion of the main hear­ing in the com­pos­i­tion re­quired by law and in the pres­ence of a clerk of court.

2 If a judge be­comes un­able to at­tend dur­ing the main hear­ing, the en­tire main hear­ing shall be held again un­less the parties waive this re­quire­ment.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may or­der that from the out­set a sub­sti­tute mem­ber of the court par­ti­cip­ates in the hear­ing in or­der to re­place a mem­ber of the court if ne­ces­sary.

4 If the court is hear­ing a case in­volving sexu­al of­fences, if so re­ques­ted by the vic­tim at least one of its mem­bers must be of the same gender as the vic­tim. Where the court com­prises one judge sit­ting alone, this rule need not be ap­plied if the case in­volves vic­tims of both genders.

Art. 336 Accused, duty defence lawyer and mandatory defence lawyer

1 The ac­cused must at­tend the main hear­ing in per­son if:

a.
the case in­volves a felony or mis­de­mean­our; or
b.
the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings or­ders a per­son­al ap­pear­ance.

2 Duty de­fence law­yers and the man­dat­ory de­fence law­yers must at­tend the main hear­ing in per­son.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may dis­pense with the re­quire­ment for the ac­cused to at­tend in per­son at the ac­cused's re­quest if the ac­cused shows good cause and his or her pres­ence is not re­quired.

4 If the ac­cused fails to at­tend without be­ing ex­cused, the reg­u­la­tions on pro­ceed­ings in ab­sen­tia ap­ply.

5 If a duty de­fence law­yer or man­dat­ory de­fence law­yer fails to at­tend, the hear­ing shall be post­poned.

Art. 337 Public prosecutor

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may sub­mit writ­ten ap­plic­a­tions to the court or be rep­res­en­ted by a pro­sec­utor in court.

2 It is neither bound by the leg­al as­sess­ment nor by the ap­plic­a­tions set out in the in­dict­ment.

3 If it re­quests a cus­todi­al sen­tence of more than one year or a cus­todi­al meas­ure, it must be rep­res­en­ted in court by a pro­sec­utor.

4 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may re­quire the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to be rep­res­en­ted by a pro­sec­utor in oth­er cases if he or she re­gards it as ne­ces­sary.

5 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor is not rep­res­en­ted by a pro­sec­utor at the main hear­ing, des­pite be­ing re­quired to be rep­res­en­ted, the hear­ing shall be post­poned.

Art. 338 Private claimant and third parties

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may dis­pense with the re­quire­ments for a private claimant to at­tend at the claimant's re­quest if his or her pres­ence is not re­quired.

2 A third party af­fected by an ap­plic­a­tion for for­feit­ure is not re­quired to ap­pear in per­son.

3 If a private claimant or a third party af­fected by an ap­plic­a­tion for for­feit­ure does not ap­pear in per­son, he or she may be rep­res­en­ted or sub­mit writ­ten ap­plic­a­tions.

Section 2 Commencement of the Main Hearing

Art. 339 Opening; Preliminary and supplementary issues

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall open the main hear­ing, an­nounce the com­pos­i­tion of the court and es­tab­lish wheth­er the per­sons summoned are present.

2 The court and the parties may then raise pre­lim­in­ary is­sues in par­tic­u­lar re­lat­ing to:

a.
the com­pet­ence of the charge;
b.
pro­ced­ur­al re­quire­ments;
c.
pro­ced­ur­al im­ped­i­ments;
d.
the files and the evid­ence taken;
e.
the ad­mis­sion of the pub­lic to the hear­ing;
f.
the di­vi­sion of the hear­ing.

3 The court de­cides im­me­di­ately on the pre­lim­in­ary is­sues after grant­ing the parties present the right to be heard.

4 If the parties raise sup­ple­ment­ary is­sues dur­ing the main hear­ing, the court shall deal with these in the same way as pre­lim­in­ary is­sues.

5 The court may ad­journ the main hear­ing at any time in or­der to deal with pre­lim­in­ary or sup­ple­ment­ary is­sues, and to add to or have the pub­lic pro­sec­utor add to the files or the evid­ence.

Art. 340 Continuation of the hearing

1 The fact that any pre­lim­in­ary is­sues have been dealt with has the fol­low­ing con­sequences:

a.
the main hear­ing must be con­duc­ted to its com­ple­tion without un­ne­ces­sary in­ter­rup­tions;
b.
the charge may no longer be with­drawn and, sub­ject to Art­icle 333, may no longer be amended;
c.
parties re­quired to at­tend may only leave the ven­ue for the hear­ing with the con­sent of the court; if a party leaves the ven­ue for the hear­ing, the hear­ing shall nev­er­the­less con­tin­ue.

2 After any pre­lim­in­ary is­sues have been dealt with, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall an­nounce the ap­plic­a­tions made by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, un­less the parties dis­pense with this re­quire­ment.

Section 3 Procedure for Taking Evidence

Art. 341 Examination hearings

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings or a mem­ber of the court that they have ap­poin­ted shall con­duct the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings.

2 The oth­er mem­bers of the court and the parties may re­quest the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings to ask sup­ple­ment­ary ques­tions or re­quest their au­thor­isa­tion to ask them them­selves.

3 At the start of the be­gin­ning of the pro­ced­ure for tak­ing evid­ence, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall ques­tion the ac­cused in de­tail on his or her per­son­al cir­cum­stances, on the charge and on the res­ults of the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 342 Division of the main hearing

1 The court may at the re­quest of the ac­cused or the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or ex of­fi­cio di­vide the main hear­ing in­to two parts; in do­ing so, it may stip­u­late that:

a.
in the first part of the pro­ceed­ings only the of­fence and the is­sue of the ac­cused's guilt will be con­sidered, and that in the second the con­sequences of con­vic­tion or ac­quit­tal shall be con­sidered; or
b.
in the first part of the pro­ceed­ings only the of­fence will be con­sidered and in the second the is­sue of the ac­cused's guilt to­geth­er with the con­sequences of con­vic­tion or ac­quit­tal will be con­sidered.

2 The de­cision on the di­vi­sion of the main hear­ing is non-con­test­able.

3 In the event of the di­vi­sion of the pro­ceed­ings, the per­son­al cir­cum­stances of the ac­cused may only be con­sidered in the main hear­ing in the event of that the ac­cused is found guilty, un­less that the ac­cused's per­son­al cir­cum­stances are of sig­ni­fic­ance in as­sess­ing the ob­ject­ive facts of the case or the state of mind of the ac­cused.

4 The ver­dict shall be giv­en fol­low­ing the de­lib­er­a­tions, but it may only be con­tested in con­junc­tion with the en­tire judg­ment.

Art. 343 Taking of evidence

1 The court shall take new evid­ence and add to evid­ence already taken that is in­com­plete.

2 It shall take evid­ence again that was not taken in the prop­er man­ner in the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings.

3 It shall take evid­ence again that was taken in the prop­er man­ner in the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings if dir­ect know­ledge of the evid­ence ap­pears ne­ces­sary in or­der to reach a de­cision.

Art. 344 Differences in legal assessment

If the court in­tends to make an as­sess­ment of the leg­al as­pects of the case that dif­fers from that of pub­lic pro­sec­utor in the in­dict­ment, it shall give no­tice of this to the parties present and give them the op­por­tun­ity to com­ment.

Art. 345 Conclusion of the procedure for taking evidence

Be­fore con­clud­ing the pro­ced­ure for tak­ing evid­ence, the court shall give the parties the op­por­tun­ity to sub­mit ad­di­tion­al re­quests for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken.

Section 4 Party Submissions and Conclusion of the Party Hearing

Art. 346 Party submissions

1 On con­clu­sion of the pro­ced­ure for tak­ing evid­ence, the parties shall present and jus­ti­fy their ap­plic­a­tions. The parties shall make their sub­mis­sions in the fol­low­ing or­der:

a.
the pub­lic pro­sec­utor;
b.
the private claimant;
c.
third parties af­fected by an ap­plic­a­tion for for­feit­ure (Art. 69–73 SCC158);
d.
the ac­cused or his or her de­fence law­yer.

2 The parties have the right to make a second party sub­mis­sion.

Art. 347 Conclusion of the party hearing

1 The ac­cused is en­titled to have the last word on con­clu­sion of the party sub­mis­sions.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall then de­clare the party hear­ing closed.

Section 5 Judgment

Art. 348 Deliberations on the judgment

1 The court shall re­tire on con­clu­sion of the party hear­ing in or­der to de­lib­er­ate on the judg­ment in private.

2 The clerk of court shall par­ti­cip­ate in an ad­vis­ory ca­pa­city.

Art. 349 Additional evidence

If the court is not yet in a po­s­i­tion to is­sue a judg­ment in the case, it may de­cide to take ad­di­tion­al evid­ence and the re­open the party hear­ing.

Art. 350 Latitude in assessing the charge; Basis for the judgment

1 The court is bound by the facts of the case set out in the in­dict­ment but not by the leg­al as­sess­ment of the case therein.

2 It shall take ac­count of the evid­ence taken in the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings and main pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 351 Decision on and notice of the judgment

1 If the court is able to de­cide on the sub­stance of the charge, it shall reach a ver­dict, and a de­cision on the sanc­tions and oth­er con­sequences.

2 It shall reach its de­cision on all points of the judg­ment by a simple ma­jor­ity. Each mem­ber is ob­liged to vote.

3 It shall give no­tice of its judg­ment in ac­cord­ance with the pro­vi­sions of Art­icle 84.

Title 8 Special Procedures

Chapter 1 Summary Penalty Order Procedure, Contravention Procedure

Section 1 Summary Penalty Order Procedure

Art. 352 Requirements

1 If the ac­cused has ac­cep­ted re­spons­ib­il­ity for the of­fence in the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings or if his or her re­spons­ib­il­ity has oth­er­wise been sat­is­fact­or­ily es­tab­lished, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall is­sue a sum­mary pen­alty or­der if, hav­ing taken ac­count of any sus­pen­ded sen­tence or pa­role or­der that must be re­voked, it re­gards any of the fol­low­ing sen­tences as ap­pro­pri­ate:

a.
a fine;
b.
a mon­et­ary pen­alty of no more than 180 daily pen­alty units;
c.159
d.
a cus­todi­al sen­tence of no more than 6 months.

2 Any of these sen­tences may be com­bined with a meas­ure in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 66 and 67e–73 SCC160.161

3 Sen­tences in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 1 let­ters b–d may be com­bined with each oth­er provided the total sen­tence im­posed cor­res­ponds to a cus­todi­al sen­tence of no more than 6 months. A fine may al­ways be com­bined with any an­oth­er sen­tence.

159 Re­pealed by An­nex No 3 of the FA of 19 June 2015 (Amend­ments to the Law of Crim­in­al Sanc­tions), with ef­fect from 1 Jan. 2018 (AS 2016 1249; BBl 2012 4721).

160 SR 311.0

161 Amended by An­nex No 5 of the FA of 20 March 2015 (Im­ple­ment­a­tion of Art. 121 para. 3–6 Fed­er­al Con­sti­tu­tion on the ex­pul­sion of for­eign na­tion­als con­victed of cer­tain crim­in­al of­fences), in force since 1 Oct. 2016 (AS 2016 2329; BBl 2013 5975).

Art. 353 Content and notice of the summary penalty order

1 The sum­mary pen­alty or­der con­tains:

a.
the name of the au­thor­ity is­su­ing the or­der;
b.
the name of the ac­cused;
c.
a de­scrip­tion of the act com­mit­ted by the ac­cused;
d.
the of­fence con­sti­tuted by the act;
e.
the sanc­tion;
f.
no­tice of the re­voc­a­tion of a sus­pen­ded sen­tence or of pa­role with a brief state­ment of the reas­ons;
g.
the costs and dam­ages due;
h.
de­tails of any seized prop­erty or as­sets that are to be re­leased or for­feited;
i.
ref­er­ence to the pos­sib­il­ity of re­ject­ing the or­der and the con­sequences of fail­ing to re­ject the or­der;
j.
place and date of is­sue;
k.
the sig­na­ture of the per­son is­su­ing the or­der.

2 If the ac­cused has ac­cep­ted the civil claims of the private claimant, this shall also be re­cor­ded in the sum­mary pen­alty or­der. Claims that are not ac­cep­ted shall be re­ferred for civil pro­ceed­ings.

3 Im­me­di­ate writ­ten no­tice of the sum­mary pen­alty or­der shall be giv­en to per­sons and au­thor­it­ies who are en­titled to re­ject the or­der.

Art. 354 Rejection

1 A writ­ten re­jec­tion of the sum­mary pen­alty or­der may be filed with the pub­lic pro­sec­utor with­in 10 days by:

a.
the ac­cused;
b.
oth­er af­fected per­sons;
c.
if so provided, the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al of Switzer­land or of the can­ton in fed­er­al or can­ton­al pro­ceed­ings re­spect­ively.

2 A re­jec­tion oth­er than that made by the ac­cused must be ac­com­pan­ied by a state­ment of grounds.

3 Un­less a val­id re­jec­tion is filed, the sum­mary pen­alty or­der be­comes a fi­nal judg­ment.

Art. 355 Procedure for rejection

1 If a re­jec­tion is filed, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall gath­er the ad­di­tion­al evid­ence re­quired to as­sess the re­jec­tion.

2 If the per­son fil­ing the re­jec­tion fails to at­tend an ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing without an ex­cuse des­pite be­ing served with a sum­mons, the re­jec­tion is deemed to have been with­drawn.

3 After tak­ing the evid­ence, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall de­cide to either:

a.
stand by the sum­mary pen­alty or­der;
b.
aban­don the pro­ceed­ings;
c.
is­sue a new sum­mary pen­alty or­der;
d.
bring charges in the court of first in­stance.

Art. 356 Procedure before the court of first instance

1 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor de­cides to stand by the sum­mary pen­alty or­der, it shall send the files im­me­di­ately to the court of first in­stance for the con­duct of the main hear­ing. The sum­mary pen­alty or­der con­sti­tutes the in­dict­ment.

2 The court of first in­stance shall de­cide on the valid­ity of the sum­mary pen­alty or­der and its re­jec­tion.

3 The re­jec­tion may be with­drawn at any time pri­or to the con­clu­sion of the party sub­mis­sions.

4 If the per­son fil­ing the re­jec­tion fails to at­tend the main hear­ing without ex­cuse or be­ing rep­res­en­ted, the re­jec­tion is deemed to have been with­drawn.

5 If the sum­mary pen­alty or­der is in­val­id, the court shall re­voke it and refer the case back to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor for new pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings to be con­duc­ted.

6 If the re­jec­tion relates only to costs and dam­ages or oth­er in­cid­ent­al leg­al or­ders, so the court shall de­cide in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings, un­less the per­son fil­ing the re­jec­tion ex­pressly re­quests a hear­ing.

7 If sum­mary pen­alty or­ders have been is­sued to two or more per­sons in re­la­tion to the same act, Art­icle 392 ap­plies mu­tatis mutandis.

Section 2 Contravention Proceedings

Art. 357

1 The ad­min­is­trat­ive au­thor­it­ies ap­poin­ted to pro­sec­ute and ad­ju­dic­ate con­tra­ven­tions have the powers of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

2 The pro­ced­ure is gov­erned mu­tatis mutandis by the reg­u­la­tions on the sum­mary pen­alty or­der pro­ced­ure.

3 If ele­ments of the con­tra­ven­tion have not been ful­filled, so the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions shall aban­don the pro­ceed­ings by is­su­ing a rul­ing with a brief state­ment of the reas­ons.

4 If in the view of the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions the facts of the case con­sti­tute a felony or mis­de­mean­our, it shall refer the case to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor.

Chapter 2 Accelerated Proceedings

Art. 358 Principles

1 At any time pri­or to bring­ing charges, the ac­cused may re­quest the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to con­duct ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings provided the ac­cused ad­mits the mat­ters es­sen­tial to the leg­al ap­prais­al of the case and re­cog­nises, if only in prin­ciple, the civil claims.

2 Ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings are not an op­tion in cases where the pub­lic pro­sec­utor re­quests a cus­todi­al sen­tence of more than five years.

Art. 359 Opening proceedings

1 The de­cision of the pub­lic pro­sec­utor on wheth­er to con­duct ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings is fi­nal. The rul­ing need not con­tain a state­ment of reas­ons.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall no­ti­fy the parties that ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings are to be con­duc­ted and shall set the private claimant a time lim­it of 10 days to file civil claims and re­quest the re­im­burse­ment of costs in­curred in the pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 360 Indictment

1 The in­dict­ment shall con­tain:

a.
the de­tails re­quired in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 325 and 326;
b.
the sen­tence;
c.
any meas­ures;
d.
in­struc­tions re­lated to the im­pos­i­tion of a sus­pen­ded sen­tence;
e.
the re­voc­a­tion of sus­pen­ded sen­tences or pa­role;
f.
the rul­ing on the civil claims made by the private claimant;
g.
the rul­ing on costs and dam­ages;
h.
no­tice to the parties that by con­sent­ing to the in­dict­ment, they waive their rights to or­din­ary pro­ceed­ings and their rights of ap­peal.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall serve the in­dict­ment on the parties. The parties must de­clare with­in ten days wheth­er they con­sent to the in­dict­ment or not. Con­sent is ir­re­voc­able.

3 If the private claimant fails to give writ­ten no­tice re­ject­ing the in­dict­ment with­in the time lim­it, he or she is deemed to have con­sen­ted to it.

4 If the parties con­sent, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall pass the in­dict­ment with the files to the court of first in­stance.

5 If any party re­jects the in­dict­ment, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall con­duct or­din­ary pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 361 Main hearing

1 The court of first in­stance shall con­duct a main hear­ing.

2 At the main hear­ing, the court shall ques­tion the ac­cused and es­tab­lish wheth­er:

a.
he or she ad­mits the mat­ters on which the charges are based; and
b.
this ad­mis­sion cor­res­ponds to the cir­cum­stances set out in the files.

3 If ne­ces­sary, the court shall also ques­tion oth­er parties present.

4 No pro­ced­ure for tak­ing evid­ence shall be con­duc­ted.

Art. 362 Judgment or rejection of application

1 The court shall be free to de­cide wheth­er:

a.
the con­duct of ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings is law­ful and reas­on­able;
b.
the charge cor­res­ponds to the res­ult the main hear­ing and the files; and
c.
the re­ques­ted sanc­tions are equit­able.

2 If the re­quire­ments for a judg­ment in the ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings are ful­filled, the court shall is­sue a judg­ment that sets out the of­fences, sanc­tions and civil claims con­tained in the in­dict­ment, to­geth­er with a brief state­ment of reas­ons for the ful­fil­ment of the re­quire­ments for the ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings.

3 If the re­quire­ments for a judg­ment in the ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings are not ful­filled, the court shall re­turn the files to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor so that or­din­ary pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings may be con­duc­ted. The court shall give no­tice of its de­cision not to is­sue a judg­ment both or­ally and by is­su­ing writ­ten con­clu­sions. This de­cision is non-con­test­able.

4 Fol­low­ing a de­cision not to is­sue a judg­ment in ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings, state­ments made by the parties for the pur­pose of the ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings may not be used in any sub­sequent or­din­ary pro­ceed­ings.

5 The sole grounds for ap­peal against a judg­ment in ac­cel­er­ated pro­ceed­ings are that a party did not con­sent to the in­dict­ment or that the judg­ment does not cor­res­pond to the in­dict­ment.

Chapter 3 Procedure for Separate Subsequent Court Decisions

Art. 363 Jurisdiction

1 The court that is­sued the first in­stance judg­ment shall also take any sep­ar­ate sub­sequent de­cisions del­eg­ated to a ju­di­cial au­thor­ity un­less the Con­fed­er­a­tion or can­tons provide oth­er­wise.

2 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor is­sued the de­cision in sum­mary pen­alty or­der pro­ceed­ings or the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions is­sued the de­cision in con­tra­ven­tion pro­ceed­ings, these au­thor­it­ies shall also take the sub­sequent de­cisions.

3 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall spe­cify the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for mak­ing sub­sequent de­cisions that are not made by the court.

Art. 364 Procedure

1 The com­pet­ent au­thor­ity shall be­gin pro­ceed­ings to is­sue a sub­sequent ju­di­cial de­cision ex of­fi­cio un­less fed­er­al law provides oth­er­wise. It shall sub­mit the rel­ev­ant files and its ap­plic­a­tion to the court.

2 In all oth­er cases, the per­son con­victed or any oth­er en­titled per­sons may re­quest pro­ceed­ings be ini­ti­ated by fil­ing a writ­ten and jus­ti­fied ap­plic­a­tion.

3 The court shall ex­am­ine wheth­er the re­quire­ments for the sub­sequent ju­di­cial de­cision are ful­filled, and shall if ne­ces­sary add to the files or ar­range for fur­ther en­quir­ies to be car­ried out by the po­lice.

4 It shall give the per­sons and au­thor­it­ies con­cerned the op­por­tun­ity to com­ment on the in­ten­ded de­cision and to sub­mit ap­plic­a­tions.

Art. 364a Preventive detention with a view to a separate subsequent court decision 162

1 The au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for ini­ti­at­ing the pro­ceed­ings to is­sue a sep­ar­ate de­cision ex of­fi­cio may or­der the ar­rest of the con­victed per­son if it is ser­i­ously to be ex­pec­ted that:

a.
the per­son will be ordered to serve a cus­todi­al sanc­tion; and
b.
the per­son:
1.
will at­tempt to evade serving the sanc­tion, or
2.
will com­mit a fur­ther felony or ser­i­ous mis­de­mean­our.

2 The pro­ced­ure is gov­erned by ana­logy by Art­icles 222–228.

3 The com­pet­ent au­thor­ity shall sub­mit the rel­ev­ant files and its ap­plic­a­tion to the court re­spons­ible for the sep­ar­ate sub­sequent de­cision as quickly as pos­sible.

162 In­ser­ted by No I of the FA of 25 Sept. 2020 (Pre­vent­ive De­ten­tion in the Pro­ced­ure for Sep­ar­ate Sub­sequent De­cisions), in force since 1 March 2021 (AS 2021 75; BBl 2019 6697).

Art. 364b Preventive detention during the court proceedings 163

1 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may or­der the ar­rest of the con­victed per­son sub­ject to the re­quire­ments of Art­icle 364apara­graph 1.

2 It shall con­duct de­ten­tion pro­ceed­ings by ana­log­ous ap­plic­a­tion of Art­icle 224 and re­quest the com­puls­ory meas­ures court or the dir­ect­or of ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings to or­der pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion. The pro­ced­ure is gov­erned by ana­logy by Art­icles 225 and 226.

3 If pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion has already been ordered, the pro­ced­ure is gov­erned by ana­logy by Art­icle 227.

4 Art­icles 222 and 230–233 also ap­ply by ana­logy.

163 In­ser­ted by No I of the FA of 25 Sept. 2020 (Pre­vent­ive De­ten­tion in the Pro­ced­ure for Sep­ar­ate Sub­sequent De­cisions), in force since 1 March 2021 (AS 2021 75; BBl 2019 6697).

Art. 365 Decision

1 The court shall de­cide based on the files. It may also or­der a hear­ing.

2 It shall is­sue its de­cision in writ­ing with a brief state­ment of reas­ons. If a hear­ing has been held, it shall make an im­me­di­ate or­al an­nounce­ment of its de­cision.

Chapter 4 Procedure in the Absence of the Accused

Section 1 Requirements and Conduct

Art. 366 Requirements

1 If an ac­cused who has been duly summoned fails to ap­pear be­fore the court of first in­stance, the court shall fix a new hear­ing and sum­mon the per­son again or ar­range for him or her to be brought be­fore the court. It shall take evid­ence where this can­not be delayed.

2 If the ac­cused fails to ap­pear for the re-ar­ranged main hear­ing or if it is not pos­sible to bring him or her be­fore the court, the main hear­ing may be held in the ab­sence of the ac­cused. The court may also sus­pend the pro­ceed­ings.

3 If the ac­cused is suf­fer­ing from a vol­un­tar­ily in­duced un­fit­ness to plead or if he or she re­fuses to be brought from de­ten­tion to the main hear­ing, the court may con­duct pro­ceed­ings im­me­di­ately in ab­sen­tia.

4 Pro­ceed­ings in ab­sen­tia may only be held if:

a.
the ac­cused has pre­vi­ously had ad­equate op­por­tun­ity in the pro­ceed­ings to com­ment on the of­fences of which he or she is ac­cused
b.
suf­fi­cient evid­ence is avail­able to reach a judg­ment without the pres­ence of the ac­cused.

Art. 367 Conduct and decision

1 The parties and the de­fence shall be per­mit­ted to make party sub­mis­sions.

2 The court shall reach its judg­ment based on the evid­ence taken in the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings and the main pro­ceed­ings.

3 On con­clu­sion of the party sub­mis­sions the court may is­sue a judg­ment or sus­pend the pro­ceed­ings un­til the ac­cused ap­pears in court in per­son.

4 Pro­ceed­ings in ab­sen­tia are oth­er­wise gov­erned by the pro­vi­sions on the main pro­ceed­ings in the first in­stance.

Section 2 Re-assessment

Art. 368 Application for a re-assessment

1 If it is pos­sible to serve the judg­ment in ab­sen­tia per­son­ally, the per­son con­victed shall be no­ti­fied that he or she has 10 days to make a writ­ten or or­al ap­plic­a­tion to the court that is­sued the judg­ment for it to re-as­sess the case.

2 In the ap­plic­a­tion, the per­son con­victed must briefly ex­plain why he or she was un­able to ap­pear at the main hear­ing.

3 The court shall re­ject the ap­plic­a­tion if the per­son con­victed was duly summoned, but failed to ap­pear at the main hear­ing without ex­cuse.

Art. 369 Procedure

1 If it is prob­able that the re­quire­ments for a re-as­sess­ment will be ful­filled, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall fix a new main hear­ing. At this hear­ing, the court shall de­cide on the ap­plic­a­tion for re-as­sess­ment and shall if ap­plic­able reach a new judg­ment.

2 The ap­peal courts shall sus­pend any ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings raised by oth­er parties.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall de­cide be­fore the main hear­ing on grant­ing sus­pens­ive ef­fect and on pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion.

4 If the con­victed per­son again fails to ap­pear for the main hear­ing, the judg­ment in ab­sen­tia shall re­main val­id.

5 The ap­plic­a­tion for re-as­sess­ment may be with­drawn at any time pri­or to the con­clu­sion of the party hear­ing sub­ject to the pay­ment of costs and dam­ages.

Art. 370 New judgment

1 The court shall is­sue a new judg­ment, which is sub­ject to the cus­tom­ary rights of ap­peal.

2 When the new judg­ment be­comes leg­ally bind­ing, the judg­ment in ab­sen­tia, and ap­peal against the same and de­cisions already taken in the ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings be­come void.

Art. 371 Relationship to an appeal

1 With­in the ap­plic­able time lim­it, a per­son con­victed may file an ap­peal against the judg­ment in ab­sen­tia in ad­di­tion to or in­stead of the ap­plic­a­tion for re-as­sess­ment. The per­son con­victed must be no­ti­fied of this pos­sib­il­ity in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 368 para­graph 1.

2 An ap­peal shall only be con­sidered if the ap­plic­a­tion for re-as­sess­ment has been re­jec­ted.

Chapter 5 Separate Measures Procedures

Section 1 Good Behaviour Bond Order

Art. 372 Requirements and jurisdiction

1 If it is not com­pet­ent to or­der a good be­ha­viour bond in terms of Art­icle 66 SCC164 in the course of the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings against the ac­cused, sep­ar­ate pro­ceed­ings shall be held.

2 If the ac­cused is in de­ten­tion due to a risk that he or she will com­mit a threatened felony or mis­de­mean­our or that he or she will com­mit that felony or mis­de­mean­our again, a good be­ha­viour bond or­der is not com­pet­ent.

3 The ap­plic­a­tion to be­gin sep­ar­ate pro­ceed­ings must be sub­mit­ted to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor in the place where the threat was made or the in­ten­tion was ex­pressed to com­mit the of­fence again.

Art. 373 Procedure

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall ques­tion the per­sons in­volved and then pass the files to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court. The court shall or­der the meas­ures men­tioned in Art­icle 66 SCC165. The per­son con­cerned may file an ob­jec­tion against an or­der of de­ten­tion with the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity.

2 The per­son threatened has the same rights as a private claimant. He or she may where this is jus­ti­fied be re­quired to lodge se­cur­ity for the costs of the pro­ceed­ings and for dam­ages.

3 The per­son al­leged to have made the threat has the rights of an ac­cused.

4 Where money bail in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 66 para­graph 3 SCC is for­feited to the state, a rul­ing there­on shall be is­sued in ap­plic­a­tion of Art­icle 240.

5 If a per­son threatens im­me­di­ate danger, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor may place this per­son pro­vi­sion­ally in de­ten­tion or take oth­er pro­tect­ive meas­ures. The pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall bring the per­son im­me­di­ately be­fore the com­pet­ent com­puls­ory meas­ures court; this court shall de­cide on wheth­er to or­der de­ten­tion.

Section 2 Procedure where the Accused is not legally responsible due to a Mental Disorder

Art. 374 Requirements and procedure

1 If an ac­cused is not leg­ally re­spons­ible due to a men­tal dis­order and if the ap­plic­a­tion of Art­icle 19 para­graph 4 or 263 SCC166 is not an op­tion, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall make a writ­ten ap­plic­a­tion to the court of first in­stance for a meas­ure in ac­cord­ance with Art­icles 59–61, 63, 64, 67 or 67b or 67e SCC, without abandon­ing the pro­ceed­ings be­fore­hand due to the ac­cused not be­ing leg­ally re­spons­ible due to a men­tal dis­order.167

2 The court of first in­stance may in con­sid­er­a­tion of the ac­cused's state of health or to pro­tect the ac­cused's pri­vacy:

a.
con­duct the pro­ceed­ings in the ab­sence of the ac­cused;
b.
ex­clude the pub­lic from the pro­ceed­ings.

3 It shall give any private claimant the op­por­tun­ity to com­ment on the ap­plic­a­tion made by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and on his or her civil claim.

4 The pro­vi­sions on the main pro­ceed­ings at first in­stance oth­er­wise ap­ply.

166 SR 311.0

167 Amended by An­nex No 1 of the FA of 13 Dec. 2013 on Activ­ity Pro­hib­i­tion Or­ders and Con­tact Pro­hib­i­tion and Ex­clu­sion Or­ders, in force since 1 Jan. 2015 (AS 2014 2055; BBl 20128819).

Art. 375 Decision

1 The court shall or­der the meas­ures re­ques­ted or oth­er meas­ures if it is sat­is­fied that the ac­cused com­mit­ted the act but is not leg­ally re­spons­ible due to a men­tal dis­order and that meas­ure is re­quired. It shall de­cide on any civil claims at the same time.

2 The or­der in re­spect of the meas­ure and the de­cision on the civil claims are is­sued in a judg­ment.

3 If the court is sat­is­fied that the ac­cused has the men­tal ca­pa­city to be leg­ally re­spons­ible or that he or she com­mit­ted the of­fences while lack­ing such men­tal ca­pa­city, it shall re­ject the ap­plic­a­tion made by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor. When this de­cision be­comes leg­ally bind­ing, the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings against the ac­cused shall be con­tin­ued.

Section 3 Separate Forfeiture Proceedings

Art. 376 Requirements

Sep­ar­ate for­feit­ure pro­ceed­ings are con­duc­ted if a de­cision must be made on the for­feit­ure of prop­erty or as­sets out­side of crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 377 Procedure

1 Prop­erty or as­sets that will prob­ably be for­feited in sep­ar­ate pro­ceed­ings shall be seized.

2 If the re­quire­ments for for­feit­ure are ful­filled the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall or­der their for­feit­ure in a for­feit­ure or­der; it shall give the per­son con­cerned the op­por­tun­ity to re­spond.

3 If the re­quire­ments are not ful­filled, it shall or­der the aban­don­ment of the pro­ceed­ings and re­turn the prop­erty or as­sets to the en­titled per­son.

4 The re­jec­tion pro­ced­ure is gov­erned by the pro­vi­sions on sum­mary pen­alty or­ders. Any de­cision made by the court shall be is­sued in the form of a de­cree or rul­ing.

Art. 378 Use for the benefit of the person suffering harm

The pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court shall also de­cide on the ap­plic­a­tions made by the per­son suf­fer­ing harm for the for­feited prop­erty or as­sets to be used for his or her be­ne­fit. Art­icle 267 para­graphs 3–6 ap­plies mu­tatis mutandis.

Title 9 Appellate Remedies

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Art. 379 Applicable regulations

Ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings are gov­erned mu­tatis mutandis by the gen­er­al pro­vi­sions of this Code, un­less this Title provides oth­er­wise.

Art. 380 Final or non-contestable decisions

Where this Code provides that a de­cision is fi­nal or non-con­test­able, there is no ap­pel­late rem­edy in re­spect of that de­cision un­der this Code.

Art. 381 Rights of the public prosecutor

1 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor may seek an ap­pel­late rem­edy for the be­ne­fit or to the det­ri­ment of an ac­cused or a per­son con­victed.

2 If the Con­fed­er­a­tion or can­tons provide for a chief pro­sec­utor or an at­tor­ney gen­er­al, they shall spe­cify which pub­lic pro­sec­utor is en­titled to seek an ap­pel­late rem­edy.

3 They shall spe­cify which au­thor­it­ies may seek an ap­pel­late rem­edy in con­tra­ven­tion pro­ceed­ings.

4 The Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al of Switzer­land may seek an ap­pel­late rem­edy in re­spect of can­ton­al de­cisions if:

a.
fed­er­al law provides that it or an­oth­er fed­er­al au­thor­ity must be no­ti­fied of the de­cision;
b.
it has re­ferred the crim­in­al case to the can­ton­al au­thor­it­ies for in­vest­ig­a­tion and ad­ju­dic­a­tion.

Art. 382 Rights of other parties

1 Any party with a le­git­im­ate in­terest in the quash­ing or amend­ment of a de­cision may seek an ap­pel­late rem­edy.

2 A private claimant may not con­test a de­cision on a sanc­tion that has been im­posed.

3 In the event of the death of the ac­cused, the per­son con­victed or a private claimant the next-of-kin in terms of Art­icle 110 para­graph 1 SCC168 and in ac­cord­ance with their rank­ing un­der the law of suc­ces­sion may seek an ap­pel­late rem­edy or con­tin­ue the ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings provided their le­git­im­ate in­terests are af­fected.

Art. 383 Payment of security

1 The dir­ect­or of ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings may re­quire the private claimant to lodge se­cur­ity with­in of a time lim­it to cov­er any costs and dam­ages. Art­icle 136 re­mains re­served.

2 If the se­cur­ity is not paid in time, the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity shall not con­sider the ap­pel­late rem­edy.

Art. 384 Commencement of the period for requesting the appellate remedy

The peri­od for re­quest­ing an ap­pel­late rem­edy be­gins:

a.
in the case of a judg­ment: with the han­dover or ser­vice of the con­clu­sions;
b.
in the case of oth­er de­cisions: with the ser­vice of the de­cision;
c.
in the case of a pro­ced­ur­al act not sub­ject to writ­ten no­tice: when the re­cip­i­ent is in­formed of it.

Art. 385 Statement of the grounds and form

1 If this Code re­quires that the ap­pel­late rem­edy be ac­com­pan­ied by a state­ment of the grounds, the per­son or the au­thor­ity seek­ing the ap­pel­late rem­edy must in­dic­ate pre­cisely:

a.
which points of the de­cision are con­tested;
b.
what grounds there are for reach­ing a dif­fer­ent de­cision;
c.
what evid­ence they wish to ad­duce in sup­port of the ap­pel­late rem­edy.

2 If the sub­mis­sion fails to sat­is­fy these re­quire­ments, the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity shall re­turn the same and fix a short ad­di­tion­al peri­od with­in which it may be amended. If the sub­mis­sion still fails to sat­is­fy the re­quire­ments after this ad­di­tion­al peri­od, the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity shall not con­sider the ap­pel­late rem­edy.

3 The in­cor­rect des­ig­na­tion of an ap­pel­late rem­edy does not ad­versely af­fect its valid­ity.

Art. 386 Waiver and withdrawal

1 Any per­son with a right to seek an ap­pel­late rem­edy may waive this right by mak­ing a writ­ten or or­al de­clar­a­tion to the au­thor­ity is­su­ing the de­cision on re­ceiv­ing no­tice of the con­test­able de­cision.

2 Any per­son who has re­ques­ted an ap­pel­late rem­edy may with­draw the same:

a.
in or­al pro­ceed­ings: be­fore the con­clu­sion of the party hear­ings;
b.
in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings: be­fore the con­clu­sion of the ex­change of sub­mis­sions and any amend­ments to the evid­ence or files.

3 Waiver and with­draw­al are fi­nal un­less the party has been in­duced to make his or her de­clar­a­tion by de­cep­tion, an of­fence or in­cor­rect of­fi­cial in­form­a­tion.

Art. 387 Suspensive effect

Ap­pel­late rem­ed­ies have no sus­pens­ive ef­fect, sub­ject to any pro­vi­sions of this Code that provide oth­er­wise or or­ders is­sued by the dir­ect­or of ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 388 Procedural and preliminary measures

The dir­ect­or of ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings shall take the re­quired pro­ced­ur­al and pre­lim­in­ary meas­ures that can­not be delayed. They may in par­tic­u­lar:

a.
in­struct the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to take evid­ence where this can­not be delayed;
b.
or­der de­ten­tion;
c.
ap­point a duty de­fence law­yer.

Art. 389 Additional evidence

1 The ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings are based on the evid­ence that was taken in the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings and in the main pro­ceed­ings be­fore the court of first in­stance.

2 Evid­ence taken by the court of first in­stance shall only be taken again if:

a.
rules on evid­ence have been in­fringed;
b.
the evid­ence taken was in­com­plete;
c.
the files on the evid­ence taken ap­pear to be un­re­li­able.

3 The ap­pel­late au­thor­ity shall take the re­quired ad­di­tion­al evid­ence ex of­fi­cio or at the re­quest of a party.

Art. 390 Written procedure

1 Any per­son who wishes to re­quest an ap­pel­late rem­edy for which this Code stip­u­lates a writ­ten pro­ced­ure must file the rel­ev­ant pe­ti­tion.

2 If the ap­pel­late rem­edy is not ob­vi­ously in­ad­miss­ible or un­jus­ti­fied, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall send the pe­ti­tion to the oth­er parties and the lower court to ob­tain their re­sponse. If the pe­ti­tion can­not be sent to a party or if a party fails to re­spond, the pro­ceed­ings shall nev­er­the­less be con­tin­ued.

3 The ap­pel­late au­thor­ity shall if ne­ces­sary or­der a second ex­change of writ­ten sub­mis­sions.

4 It shall make its de­cision by way of cir­cu­la­tion or by de­lib­er­at­ing in cam­era based on the files and any ad­di­tion­al evid­ence taken.

5 It may or­der a hear­ing ex of­fi­cio at the re­quest of a party.

Art. 391 Decision

1 In mak­ing its de­cision, the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity is not bound by:

a.
the grounds put for­ward by the parties;
b.
the ap­plic­a­tions made by the parties un­less it is con­sid­er­ing civil claims.

2 It may not amend de­cisions to the pre­ju­dice of an ac­cused or per­son con­victed if the ap­peal was filed solely for that per­son's be­ne­fit. However, it may im­pose a more severe pen­alty where facts have come to light that the court of first in­stance could not have known.

3 It may not amend de­cisions on civil mat­ters to the pre­ju­dice of a private claimant if this is the only per­son to re­quest an ap­pel­late rem­edy.

Art. 392 Extending the application of successful appellate remedies

1 Where only cer­tain in­di­vidu­al sus­pects or per­son con­victed in the same pro­ceed­ings have re­ques­ted an ap­pel­late rem­edy and if this ap­pel­late rem­edy is gran­ted, the con­tested de­cision shall also be quashed or amended in fa­vour of the per­sons who did not re­quest an ap­pel­late rem­edy if:

a.
the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity as­sessed the facts of the case dif­fer­ently; and
b.
their con­sid­er­a­tions area also rel­ev­ant to the oth­er parties.

2 Be­fore mak­ing their de­cision, the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity shall if ne­ces­sary hear the ac­cused or per­son con­victed who have not re­ques­ted an ap­pel­late rem­edy, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor and the private claimant.

Chapter 2 Objections

Art. 393 Admissibility and grounds

1 An ob­jec­tion is ad­miss­ible against:

a.
the rul­ings and the pro­ced­ur­al acts of the po­lice, pub­lic pro­sec­utor and au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions;
b.
the rul­ings, de­crees and pro­ced­ur­al acts of courts of first in­stance, with the ex­cep­tion of pro­ced­ur­al de­cisions;
c.
the de­cisions of the com­puls­ory meas­ures court in the cases provided for by this Code.

2 An ob­jec­tion may con­test:

a.
an in­fringe­ment of the law, in­clud­ing ex­ceed­ing and ab­us­ing dis­cre­tion­ary powers, the deni­al of justice and un­jus­ti­fied delay;
b.
an in­com­plete or in­cor­rect as­sess­ment of the cir­cum­stances of the case;
c.
a de­cision that is in­equit­able.

Art. 394 Inadmissibility of the objection

An ob­jec­tion is not per­mit­ted:

a.
if an ap­peal is ad­miss­ible;
b.
against the re­jec­tion of re­quests for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions, if the ap­plic­a­tion may be filed again be­fore the court of first in­stance without leg­al dis­ad­vant­age.

Art. 395 Collegial court as objections authority

If the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity is a col­legi­al court, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall de­cide on the ob­jec­tion alone if it has the fol­low­ing sub­ject mat­ter:

a.
con­tra­ven­tions only;
b.
the fin­an­cial con­sequences of a de­cision where the amount in dis­pute is no more than 5000 francs.

Art. 396 Form and time limit

1 An ob­jec­tion against de­cisions is­sued in writ­ing or or­ally must be filed with­in 10 days in writ­ing and with a state­ment of grounds with the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity.

2 There is no time lim­it for fil­ing an ob­jec­tion al­leging a deni­al of justice or un­jus­ti­fied delay.

Art. 397 Procedure and decision

1 An ob­jec­tion shall be dealt with by writ­ten pro­ceed­ings.

2 If the au­thor­ity up­holds the ob­jec­tion, it shall make a new de­cision or quash the con­tested de­cision and refer the case back to the lower court for a new de­cision.

3 If it up­holds an ob­jec­tion to a rul­ing abandon­ing pro­ceed­ings, it may is­sue in­struc­tions to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the au­thor­ity re­spons­ible for pro­sec­ut­ing con­tra­ven­tions on the con­tinu­ation of the pro­ceed­ings.

4 If it holds that there has been a deni­al of justice or un­jus­ti­fied delay, it may is­sue in­struc­tions to the au­thor­ity con­cerned and set time lim­its for its com­pli­ance.

Chapter 3 Appeals

Section 1 General Provisions

Art. 398 Admissibility and grounds

1 An ap­peal is per­mit­ted against judg­ments of courts of first in­stance that con­clude the pro­ceed­ings in their en­tirety or in part.

2 The court of ap­peal may re­view the judg­ment com­pre­hens­ively on all con­tested points.

3 An ap­peal may con­test:

a.
an in­fringe­ment of the law, in­clud­ing ex­ceed­ing and ab­us­ing dis­cre­tion­ary powers, the deni­al of justice and un­jus­ti­fied delay;
b.
an in­com­plete or in­cor­rect as­sess­ment of the cir­cum­stances of the case;
c.
a de­cision that is in­equit­able.

4 Where the main hear­ing be­fore the court of first in­stance con­sidered con­tra­ven­tions only, the ap­peal may only claim that the judg­ment con­tains er­rors in law or the as­sess­ment of the cir­cum­stances was clearly in­cor­rect or based on an in­fringe­ment of the law. New aver­ments and evid­ence may not be raised.

5 If the ap­peal is lim­ited to civil mat­ters, the first in­stance judg­ment shall only be re­viewed to the ex­tent per­mit­ted by the civil pro­ced­ure law ap­plic­able at the place of jur­is­dic­tion.

Art. 399 Notice of intention to appeal and appeal petition

1 No­tice of in­ten­tion to ap­peal must be giv­en in writ­ing or or­ally to the court of first in­stance with­in 10 days of the is­su­ing of the judg­ment.

2 When it has drawn up the writ­ten judg­ment stat­ing the grounds, the court of first in­stance shall trans­mit the no­tice to­geth­er with the files to the court of ap­peal.

3 The party that has giv­en no­tice of in­ten­tion to ap­peal shall file a writ­ten ap­peal pe­ti­tion with the court of ap­peal with­in 20 days of re­ceiv­ing the writ­ten judg­ment stat­ing the grounds. In the pe­ti­tion, he or she must in­dic­ate:

a.
wheth­er he or she is con­test­ing the judg­ment in its en­tirety or only in part;
b.
which changes to the judg­ment is­sued by the court of first in­stance judg­ment it is re­quest­ing; and
c.
what re­quests for fur­ther evid­ence to be taken it is mak­ing.

4 If a per­son is only con­test­ing part of the judg­ment, he or she must in­dic­ate in the ap­peal pe­ti­tion which of the fol­low­ing parts the ap­peal is lim­ited to:

a.
the ver­dict, and which ver­dict if there is more than one of­fence;
b.
the sen­tence im­posed;
c.
the meas­ures ordered;
d.
the civil claim or in­di­vidu­al civil claims;
e.
the in­cid­ent­al ef­fects of the judg­ment;
f.
the award of costs, dam­ages or sat­is­fac­tion;
g.
the sub­sequent ju­di­cial de­cisions.

Art. 400 Preliminary examination

1 If it is not clear from the ap­peal pe­ti­tion wheth­er the first in­stance judg­ment is be­ing con­tested in its en­tirety or only in part, the dir­ect­or of ap­peal pro­ceed­ings shall re­quest the party to cla­ri­fy the pe­ti­tion and set a time lim­it for that pur­pose.

2 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall send a copy of the ap­peal pe­ti­tion to the oth­er parties im­me­di­ately.

3 With­in 20 days of re­ceipt of the ap­peal pe­ti­tion, the oth­er parties may:

a.
make a writ­ten ap­plic­a­tion for the dis­missal of the ap­peal without con­sid­er­ing its sub­stance; the ap­plic­a­tion con­tain with a state­ment of the grounds;
b.
de­clare their in­ten­tion to file a cross-ap­peal.

Art. 401 Cross-appeal

1 Cross-ap­peals are gov­erned mu­tatis mutandis by Art­icle 399 para­graphs 3 and 4.

2 They are not lim­ited to the scope of the main ap­peal, un­less it relates solely to the civil as­pect of the judg­ment.

3 If the main ap­peal is with­drawn or dis­missed without its sub­stance be­ing con­sidered, the cross-ap­peal also lapses.

Art. 402 Effect of the appeal

An ap­peal has sus­pens­ive ef­fect with re­gard to the mat­ters con­tested.

Section 2 Procedure

Art. 403 Decision to consider the substance of the appeal

1 The court of ap­peal shall de­cide in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings wheth­er it should con­sider the sub­stance of the ap­peal where the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings or a party claims:

a.
the no­tice of in­ten­tion to ap­peal or ap­peal pe­ti­tion was filed too late or is in­ad­miss­ible;
b.
the ap­peal is in­ad­miss­ible un­der Art­icle 398;
c.
pro­ced­ur­al re­quire­ments have not been ful­filled or there are pro­ced­ur­al im­ped­i­ments.

2 It shall give the parties op­por­tun­ity to com­ment.

3 If it de­cides not to con­sider the sub­stance of the ap­peal, it shall give no­tice of its de­cision and the grounds there­for to the parties.

4 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall oth­er­wise and without any fur­ther form­al­it­ies make the re­quired ar­range­ments for con­duct­ing the ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 404 Extent of consideration

1 The court of ap­peal shall con­sider only the con­tested points in the first in­stance judg­ment.

2 It may also con­sider points not con­tested for the be­ne­fit of the ac­cused in or­der to pre­vent an un­law­ful or un­fair de­cision from be­ing made.

Art. 405 Oral procedure

1 The or­al ap­peal hear­ing is gov­erned by the pro­vi­sions on the main hear­ing in the first in­stance.

2 If the ac­cused or the private claimant filed the ap­peal or cross-ap­peal, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall sum­mon him or her to the ap­peal hear­ing. In simple cases, he or she may, if re­ques­ted, be gran­ted dis­pens­a­tion not to at­tend and be per­mit­ted to sub­mit and jus­ti­fy their ap­plic­a­tions in writ­ing.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall sum­mon the pub­lic pro­sec­utor to the hear­ing:

a.
in the cases men­tioned in Art­icle 337 para­graphs 3 and 4;
b.
if the pub­lic pro­sec­utor has filed the ap­peal or the cross-ap­peal.

4 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor is not summoned, it may sub­mit writ­ten ap­plic­a­tions and a writ­ten state­ment of the grounds or ap­pear per­son­ally in court.

Art. 406 Written procedure

1 The court of ap­peal may deal with the ap­peal in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings if:

a.
its de­cision relates solely to leg­al is­sues;
b.
only the civil as­pect is be­ing con­tested;
c.
the sub­ject mat­ter of the judg­ment of the court of first in­stance is a con­tra­ven­tion and the ap­peal does not re­quest a con­vic­tion for a felony or mis­de­mean­our;
d.
only an award of costs, dam­ages or sat­is­fac­tion is be­ing con­tested;
e.
only meas­ures un­der Art­icle 66–73 SCC169 are be­ing con­tested.

2 With the con­sent the parties, the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings may also or­der writ­ten pro­ceed­ings if:

a.
the pres­ence the ac­cused is not re­quired;
b.
the ap­peal relates to the de­cision of a judge sit­ting alone.

3 The dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings shall fix a time lim­it with­in which the party fil­ing the ap­peal must sub­mit a writ­ten state­ment of the grounds.

4 The sub­sequent pro­ceed­ings are gov­erned by Art­icle 390 para­graphs 2–4.

Art. 407 Default by the parties

1 The ap­peal or cross-ap­peal is deemed to have been with­drawn if the party that has filed it:

a.
fails without ex­cuse to at­tend or to ar­range to be rep­res­en­ted at the or­al ap­peal hear­ing;
b.
fails to file any writ­ten sub­mis­sions; or
c.
can­not be summoned.

2 If the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the private claimant has filed an ap­peal against the ver­dict or the sen­tence and the ac­cused fails without ex­cuse to at­tend the hear­ing, so pro­ceed­ings in ab­sen­tia shall be held.

3 If the private claimant has lim­ited his or her ap­peal to the civil as­pect and the ac­cused fails without ex­cuse to at­tend the hear­ing, the court of ap­peal shall de­cide as on the basis of the find­ings made in the main hear­ing be­fore the court of first in­stance and the oth­er files.

Section 3 Appeal Decision

Art. 408 New judgment

If the court of ap­peal de­cides to con­sider the sub­stance of the ap­peal, it shall is­sue a new judg­ment which re­places the first in­stance judg­ment.

Art. 409 Quashing the judgment and remitting the case

1 If the pro­ceed­ings in the first in­stance were so ser­i­ously flawed that they can­not be rec­ti­fied by the ap­peal pro­ceed­ings, the court of ap­peal shall quash the con­tested judg­ment and re­mit the case to the court of first in­stance so that it may con­duct a new main hear­ing and is­sue a new judg­ment.

2 The court of ap­peal shall de­cide which pro­ced­ur­al acts must be re­peated or car­ried out.

3 The court of first in­stance is bound by the in­ter­pret­a­tion of law made by the court of ap­peal in the de­cree re­mit­ting the case and by the in­struc­tion is­sued in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 2.

Chapter 4 Review

Art. 410 Admissibility of and grounds for a review

1 Any per­son who is ad­versely af­fected by a leg­ally bind­ing fi­nal judg­ment, a sum­mary pen­alty or­der, a sub­sequent ju­di­cial de­cision or a de­cision in sep­ar­ate pro­ceed­ings on meas­ures may re­quest a re­view of the case if:

a.
new cir­cum­stances that arose be­fore the de­cision or new evid­ence have come to light that are likely to lead to an ac­quit­tal, a con­sid­er­ably re­duced or more severe pen­alty for the con­victed per­son or the con­vic­tion of an ac­quit­ted per­son;
b.
the de­cision is ir­re­con­cil­ably con­tra­dict­ory to a sub­sequent crim­in­al judg­ment re­lat­ing to the same set of cir­cum­stances;
c.
it has been proven in oth­er crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings that the res­ult of pro­ceed­ings was in­flu­enced by a crim­in­al of­fence; a con­vic­tion is not re­quired; if it is not pos­sible to con­duct crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings, proof may be ad­duced in an­oth­er way.

2 The re­view of a case due to a vi­ol­a­tion of the Con­ven­tion of 4 Novem­ber 1950170 for the Pro­tec­tion of Hu­man Rights and Fun­da­ment­al Freedoms (ECHR) may be re­ques­ted if:

a.
the European Court of Hu­man Rights has held in a fi­nal judg­ment that the ECHR or its Pro­to­cols have been vi­ol­ated;
b.
the con­sequences the vi­ol­a­tion can­not be com­pensated for by the pay­ment of dam­ages; and
c.
the re­view of a case is ne­ces­sary in or­der to re­dress the vi­ol­a­tion.

3 The re­view of a case for the be­ne­fit of the per­son con­victed may also be re­ques­ted after the case be­comes time-barred.

4 Is the re­view of a case is lim­ited to civil claims, it shall be ad­miss­ible only if the civil pro­ced­ure law ap­plic­able at the place of jur­is­dic­tion would al­low a re­view of a case.

Art. 411 Form and time limit

1 Ap­plic­a­tions for the re­view of a case must be sub­mit­ted to the court of ap­peal in writ­ing and in­clude a state­ment of the grounds. The ap­plic­a­tion must in­dic­ate and sub­stan­ti­ate the grounds for the re­view.

2 Ap­plic­a­tions in terms of Art­icle 410 para­graph 1 let­ter b and 2 must be filed with­in 90 days of re­ceiv­ing no­tice of the de­cision con­cerned. In oth­er cases, ap­plic­a­tions for the re­view of a case are not sub­ject to a time lim­it.

Art. 412 Preliminary examination and decision to consider the substance of the case

1 The court of ap­peal shall con­duct a pre­lim­in­ary ex­am­in­a­tion of the ap­plic­a­tion for a re­view in writ­ten pro­ceed­ings.

2 If the ap­plic­a­tion is clearly in ad­miss­ible or un­jus­ti­fied or if an ap­plic­a­tion on the same grounds has already been made and re­jec­ted, the court shall not con­sider the sub­stance of the case.

3 The court shall oth­er­wise re­quest the oth­er parties and the lower court to com­ment in writ­ing.

4 It shall de­cide on the re­quired ad­di­tions to the evid­ence and files as well as on pre­lim­in­ary meas­ures, un­less this is the re­spons­ib­il­ity of the dir­ect­or of pro­ceed­ings in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 388.

Art. 413 Decision

1 If the court of ap­peal re­jects the grounds for a re­view put for­ward, it shall dis­miss the ap­plic­a­tion for a re­view and can­cel any pre­lim­in­ary meas­ures.

2 If the court of ap­peal ac­cepts the grounds for a re­view put for­ward, it shall quash the con­tested de­cision in its en­tirety or in part and:

a.
re­mit the case to the au­thor­ity that it des­ig­nates for re­con­sid­er­a­tion and a new judg­ment; or
b.
make a new de­cision it­self, provided the state of the files so per­mits.

3 In the event that it re­mits the case, it shall de­cide on the ex­tent to which the grounds for a re­view ac­cep­ted nul­li­fy the leg­al­ity and en­force­ab­il­ity of the con­tested de­cision and at what stage the pro­ceed­ings should be re­sumed.

4 It may or­der the ac­cused to be placed tem­por­ar­ily or to re­main in pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion, if the rel­ev­ant re­quire­ments are ful­filled.

Art. 414 New proceedings

1 If the court of ap­peal has re­mit­ted the case to the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor shall de­cide wheth­er to raise a new pro­sec­u­tion, to is­sue a sum­mary pen­alty or­der or to aban­don the pro­ceed­ings.

2 If it has re­mit­ted the case to a court, the court shall take any ad­di­tion­al evid­ence re­quired and, fol­low­ing a main hear­ing, shall is­sue a new judg­ment.

Art. 415 Consequences of the new decision

1 If the new de­cision im­poses a high­er sen­tence on the ac­cused, the por­tion of the ori­gin­al sen­tence already served shall be taken in­to ac­count.

2 If the ac­cused is ac­quit­ted or a more le­ni­ent sen­tence is im­posed or if the pro­ceed­ings are aban­doned, any fines or mon­et­ary pen­al­ties that have been over­paid shall be re­fun­ded. Claims made by the ac­cused for dam­ages or sat­is­fac­tion are gov­erned by Art­icle 436 para­graph 4.

3 If a con­vic­tion is over­turned and an ac­quit­tal im­posed, the ac­cused or, fol­low­ing his or her death, his or her next-of-kin may de­mand that the new de­cision be pub­lished.

Title 10 Procedural Costs, Damages and Satisfaction

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Art. 416 Scope of application

The pro­vi­sions of this Title ap­ply to all pro­ced­ures un­der this Code.

Art. 417 Liability to pay costs for procedural default

In the event of fail­ure to com­ply with pro­ced­ur­al re­quire­ments or any oth­er form of pro­ced­ur­al de­fault, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity may re­quire the party re­spons­ible for the de­fault to pay pro­ced­ur­al costs and dam­ages re­gard­less of the out­come of the pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 418 Participation of more than one person and liability of third parties

1 If more than one per­son is li­able to pay costs, the costs shall be im­posed pro­por­tion­ately.

2 Where two or more per­sons are jointly re­spons­ible for costs be­ing in­curred, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity may or­der that per­sons con­cerned are jointly and sev­er­ally li­able to pay the costs.

3 It may re­quire third parties in ac­cord­ance with the civil law prin­ciples of li­ab­il­ity to bear the costs jointly and sev­er­ally with the ac­cused.

Art. 419 Liability to pay costs of persons not legally responsible due to a mental disorder

If the pro­ceed­ings are aban­doned or res­ult in an ac­quit­tal be­cause the ac­cused is not leg­ally re­spons­ible due to a men­tal dis­order, the costs may be im­posed on the ac­cused if this ap­pears reas­on­able in all the cir­cum­stances.

Art. 420 Legal action

The Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton may take leg­al ac­tion against per­sons who wil­fully or through gross neg­li­gence lead it to in­cur costs by:

a.
caus­ing pro­ceed­ings to be in­sti­tuted;
b.
make the pro­ceed­ings con­sid­er­ably more com­plic­ated;
c.
bring­ing about a de­cision that is over­turned in re­view pro­ceed­ings.

Art. 421 Decision on costs

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall de­cide who is to bear any costs in the fi­nal judg­ment.

2 It may make an ad­vance de­cision in:

a.
in­ter­im de­cisions;
b.
de­cisions on the par­tial aban­don­ment of the pro­ceed­ings;
c.
de­cisions on ap­peals against in­ter­im and aban­don­ment de­cisions.

Chapter 2 Procedural Costs

Art. 422 Definition

1 The pro­ced­ur­al costs com­prise the charges that cov­er fees and out­lays in a spe­cif­ic crim­in­al case.

2 Out­lays are in par­tic­u­lar:

a.
the cost of the duty de­fence law­yer and leg­al aid rep­res­ent­at­ive;
b.
the cost of trans­la­tions;
c.
the cost of ex­pert re­ports;
d.
the cost in­curred by in­volving oth­er au­thor­it­ies;
e.
post­age, tele­phone and sim­il­ar ex­penses.

Art. 423 Principles

1 The pro­ced­ur­al costs shall be borne by the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton that con­ducts the pro­ceed­ings, un­less oth­er­wise provided in this Code.

2 and 3171

171 Re­pealed by An­nex No II 7 of the Crim­in­al Justice Au­thor­it­ies Act of 19 March 2010, with ef­fect from 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 3267; BBl 2008 8125).

Art. 424 Calculation and fees

1 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall is­sue reg­u­la­tions on the cal­cu­la­tion of pro­ced­ur­al costs and shall stip­u­late the fees.

2 They may stip­u­late flat-rate fees for simple cases that also cov­er the out­lays.

Art. 425 Deferment and remission

The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity may de­fer its claim to pro­ced­ur­al costs or, tak­ing ac­count of the fin­an­cial cir­cum­stances of the per­son li­able to pay, re­duce or re­mit the sum due.

Art. 426 Liability to pay costs of the accused and parties to separate measures proceedings

1 The ac­cused shall bear the pro­ced­ur­al costs if he or she is con­victed. Ex­emp­ted there­from are the costs of the duty de­fence law­yer; Art­icle 135 para­graph 4 is re­served.

2 If the pro­ceed­ings are aban­doned or the ac­cused ac­quit­ted, all or part of the pro­ced­ur­al costs may be im­posed on the ac­cused if he or she has un­law­fully or culp­ably caused the pro­ceed­ings to be ini­ti­ated or has ob­struc­ted their con­duct.

3 The ac­cused shall not bear the pro­ced­ur­al costs that:

a.
the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton has in­curred through un­ne­ces­sary or flawed pro­ced­ur­al acts;
b.
are in­curred for trans­la­tions that were ne­ces­sary be­cause the ac­cused speaks a for­eign lan­guage.

4 The ac­cused shall bear the costs of the private claimant's leg­al aid rep­res­ent­at­ive only if he or she has the fin­an­cial means to do so.

5 The pro­vi­sions of this Art­icle ap­ply mu­tatis mutandis to parties to sep­ar­ate meas­ures pro­ced­ures if they are un­suc­cess­ful.

Art. 427 Liability to pay costs of the private claimant and the complainant

1 The private claimant may be ordered to pay pro­ced­ur­al costs in­curred as a res­ult of his or her ap­plic­a­tions on civil mat­ters if:

a.
the pro­ceed­ings are aban­doned or the ac­cused is ac­quit­ted;
b.
the private claimant with­draws the civil claim be­fore the con­clu­sion of the main hear­ing be­fore the court of first in­stance;
c.
the civil pro­ceed­ings are dis­missed or re­mit­ted to the civil courts.

2 In the case of of­fences pro­sec­uted only on com­plaint, pro­ced­ur­al costs may be im­posed on the com­plain­ant where he or she has wil­fully or through gross neg­li­gence brought about the pro­ceed­ings or has ob­struc­ted their con­duct, or on the private claimant where:

a.
the pro­ceed­ings are aban­doned or the ac­cused is ac­quit­ted; and
b.
the ac­cused is not li­able to pay costs in terms of Art­icle 426 para­graph 2.

3 If the com­plain­ant with­draws the crim­in­al com­plaint as part of a set­tle­ment ar­ranged by the pub­lic pro­sec­utor, the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton shall nor­mally bear the pro­ced­ur­al costs.

4 An agree­ment between the com­plain­ant and the ac­cused on who is to bear the costs in the event that the crim­in­al com­plaint is with­drawn re­quires the ap­prov­al of the au­thor­ity that or­ders the case to be aban­doned. The agree­ment may not pre­ju­dice the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton.

Art. 428 Allocation of costs in appellate proceedings

1 The costs of the ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings are borne by the parties ac­cord­ing to wheth­er they are suc­cess­ful or not. An ap­pel­lant is also re­garded as un­suc­cess­ful if the ap­peal is dis­missed without its sub­stance be­ing con­sidered or if the ap­peal is with­drawn.

2 Where an ap­pel­lant se­cures a more fa­vour­able de­cision, he or she may be ordered to pay costs if:

a.
the ap­peal is suc­cess­ful due to cir­cum­stances that be­came ap­par­ent for the first time in the ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings; or
b.
only minor changes are made to the con­tested de­cision.

3 If the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity it­self is­sues a new de­cision, it shall also re­view the rul­ing on costs is­sued by the lower court.

4 If it quashes a de­cision and re­mits the case to the lower for a new de­cision, the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton shall bear the costs of the ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings, if the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity so de­cides, those of the lower court.

5 If an ap­plic­a­tion for a re­view is ap­proved, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity that must sub­sequently deal with the case shall de­cide at its dis­cre­tion on the costs of the first pro­ceed­ings.

Chapter 3 Damages and Satisfaction

Section 1 Accused

Art. 429 Claims

1 If the ac­cused is wholly or partly ac­quit­ted or if the pro­ceed­ings against the ac­cused are aban­doned, he or she is en­titled to:

a.
dam­ages for his or her ex­pendit­ure in­curred in the ap­pro­pri­ate ex­er­cise of their pro­ced­ur­al rights;
b.
dam­ages for the fin­an­cial losses that he or she in­curs due to the re­quired par­ti­cip­a­tion in the crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings;
c.
sat­is­fac­tion for par­tic­u­larly ser­i­ous vi­ol­a­tions of his or her per­son­al cir­cum­stances, in par­tic­u­lar due to depriva­tion of liberty.

2 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall ex­am­ine the claim ex of­fi­cio. It may re­quire the ac­cused to quanti­fy and sub­stan­ti­ate the claim.

Art. 430 Reduction or refusal of damages or satisfaction

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity may re­duce the dam­ages or sat­is­fac­tion or re­fuse to pay if:

a.
the ac­cused has un­law­fully and culp­ably brought about the pro­ceed­ings or has ob­struc­ted their con­duct;
b.
the private claimant is re­quired to pay dam­ages to the ac­cused; or
c.
the ac­cused's ex­pendit­ure is neg­li­gible.

2 In the ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings, dam­ages and sat­is­fac­tion may be fur­ther re­duced if the re­quire­ments of Art­icle 428 para­graph 2 are ful­filled.

Art. 431 Unlawfully applied compulsory measures

1 If com­puls­ory meas­ures have been ap­plied to the ac­cused un­law­fully, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall award the ac­cused ap­pro­pri­ate dam­ages and sat­is­fac­tion.

2 There is a right to dam­ages and sat­is­fac­tion in re­la­tion to re­mand and pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion if the per­mit­ted peri­od of de­ten­tion is ex­ceeded is and the ex­cess­ive depriva­tion of liberty can­not be not ac­coun­ted for in sanc­tions im­posed in re­spect of oth­er of­fences.

3 The right un­der para­graph 2 ceases to ap­ply if the ac­cused:

a.
is sen­tenced to a mon­et­ary pen­alty, com­munity ser­vice or a fine and the equi­val­ent al­tern­at­ive cus­todi­al sen­tence would not be sub­stan­tially short­er than the time spent on re­mand or in pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion;
b.
re­ceives a sus­pen­ded cus­todi­al sen­tence the length of which ex­ceeds the time spent on re­mand or in pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion.

Art. 432 Rights in relation to the private claimant and the complainant

1 The ac­cused, if ac­quit­ted, is en­titled to ap­pro­pri­ate dam­ages from the private claimant in re­spect of ex­pendit­ure in­curred in re­la­tion to the civil claim.

2 If the ac­cused is ac­quit­ted of an of­fence pro­sec­uted only on com­plaint, the com­plain­ant may be re­quired to com­pensate the ac­cused for ex­pendit­ure in­curred in the prop­er ex­er­cise of his or her pro­ced­ur­al rights, provided the com­plain­ant has brought about the pro­ceed­ings wil­fully or through gross neg­li­gence or has ob­struc­ted their con­duct.

Section 2 Private Claimant and Third Parties

Art. 433 Private claimant

1 The private claimant is en­titled to ap­pro­pri­ate dam­ages from the ac­cused for costs in­curred in the pro­ceed­ings if:

a.
the claim is suc­cess­ful; or
b.
the ac­cused is li­able to pay costs in terms of Art­icle 426 para­graph 2.

2 The private claimant must sub­mit his or her dam­ages claim to the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity, and quant­ity and sub­stan­ti­ate the same. If he or she fails to ful­fil this ob­lig­a­tion, the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity shall not con­sider the claim

Art. 434 Third parties

1 Third parties have the right to ap­pro­pri­ate dam­ages for losses that are not oth­er­wise covered and to sat­is­fac­tion if they have in­curred losses as a res­ult of pro­ced­ur­al acts or in provid­ing sup­port to the crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies. Art­icle 433 para­graph 2 ap­plies mu­tatis mutandis.

2 A de­cision shall be made on the claims in the fi­nal judg­ment. In clear cases, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor may is­sue a de­cision in the pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ings.

Section 3 Special Provisions

Art. 435 Time limits

Claims for dam­ages and sat­is­fac­tion against the Con­fed­er­a­tion or the can­ton must be filed with­in 10 years of the date on which the de­cision be­comes leg­ally bind­ing.

Art. 436 Damages and satisfaction in appellate proceedings

1 Claims for dam­ages and sat­is­fac­tion in ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings are gov­erned by Art­icles 429–434.

2 Where the ac­cused is neither fully nor partly ac­quit­ted and the pro­ceed­ings are not aban­doned but the ac­cused is suc­cess­ful on oth­er points, he or she is en­titled to ap­pro­pri­ate dam­ages for his or her ex­pendit­ure.

3 If the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity quashes a de­cision in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 409, the parties are en­titled to ap­pro­pri­ate dam­ages for their ex­pendit­ure in the ap­pel­late pro­ceed­ings and that part of the pro­ceed­ings be­fore the court of first in­stance that re­lated to the quashed de­cision.

4 An ac­cused who is ac­quit­ted or re­ceives a re­duced sen­tence fol­low­ing a re­view of the case is en­titled to ap­pro­pri­ate dam­ages for his or her ex­pendit­ure in the re­view pro­ceed­ings. He or she is also en­titled to sat­is­fac­tion and dam­ages for time spent in cus­tody, provided this depriva­tion of liberty can­not be not ac­coun­ted for in sanc­tions im­posed in re­spect of oth­er of­fences.

Title 11 Legal Effect and Execution of Decisions in Criminal Proceedings

Chapter 1 Legal Effect

Art. 437 Entry into force

1 Judg­ments and oth­er de­cisions con­clud­ing pro­ceed­ings against which an ap­pel­late rem­edy may be re­ques­ted un­der this Code be­come leg­ally bind­ing when:

a.
the peri­od for re­ques­ted ap­pel­late rem­edy has ex­pired and no re­quest has been made;
b.
the en­titled per­son de­clares that he or she is waiv­ing his or her right to an ap­pel­late rem­edy or with­draw­ing an ap­pel­late rem­edy already re­ques­ted;
c.
the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity de­cides not to con­sider the sub­stance of the ap­pel­late rem­edy or to re­ject it.

2 The de­cision be­comes leg­ally bind­ing with ret­ro­spect­ive ef­fect from the day on which the de­cision was is­sued.

3 De­cisions that are not sub­ject to the right to an ap­pel­late rem­edy un­der this Code be­come leg­ally bind­ing on be­ing is­sued.

Art. 438 Notification of legal effect

1 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity that has is­sued a de­cision shall note the date on which it be­comes leg­ally bind­ing in the files or in the judg­ment.

2 If the parties have been no­ti­fied that an ap­pel­late rem­edy has been re­ques­ted, they shall also be no­ti­fied of the date on which the judg­ment be­comes leg­ally bind­ing.

3 If there is a dis­pute over wheth­er or when a de­cision has be­come leg­ally bind­ing, the au­thor­ity that has is­sued the de­cision shall rule on the mat­ter.

4 An ob­jec­tion may be filed against the rul­ing on the leg­ally bind­ing ef­fect of the de­cision.

Chapter 2 Enforcement of Decisions in Criminal Proceedings

Art. 439 Execution of sentences and measures

1 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall de­term­ine the au­thor­it­ies re­spons­ible for the ex­e­cu­tion of sen­tences and meas­ures as well as the rel­ev­ant pro­ced­ure; spe­cial reg­u­la­tions in this Code and in the SCC172 are re­served.

2 The ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity shall is­sue an ex­e­cu­tion or­der.

3 Leg­ally-bind­ing cus­todi­al sen­tences and cus­todi­al meas­ures must be ex­ecuted im­me­di­ately:

a.
if there is a risk of ab­scond­ing;
b.
if there is a ser­i­ous risk to the pub­lic; or
c.
if there is no guar­an­tee that the pur­pose of the meas­ure will oth­er­wise be ful­filled.

4 In or­der to im­ple­ment the ex­e­cu­tion or­der, the ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity may ar­rest the per­son con­victed, is­sue a war­rant for his or her ar­rest or re­quest his or her ex­tra­di­tion.

Art. 440 Preventive detention

1 In cases of ur­gency, the ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity may place the per­son con­victed in pre­vent­ive de­ten­tion to en­sure of that the sen­tence or the meas­ure is ex­ecuted.

2 It shall sub­mit the case with­in 5 days of the per­son's de­ten­tion:

a.
to the court that im­posed the sen­tence or meas­ure that is to be ex­ecuted;
b.
in the case of sum­mary pen­alty or­ders, to the com­puls­ory meas­ures court at the place where the pub­lic pro­sec­utor is­sued the sum­mary pen­alty or­der.

3 The court shall make a fi­nal de­cision on wheth­er the per­son con­victed re­mains in de­ten­tion un­til the com­mence­ment of the sen­tence or meas­ure.

Art. 441 Time limit for enforcement

1 Sen­tences that are time-barred may not be en­forced.

2 The ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity shall veri­fy ex of­fi­cio wheth­er the sen­tence is time barred.

3 The per­son con­victed may con­test the planned ex­e­cu­tion of a time-barred sen­tence or meas­ure be­fore the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity of the can­ton of ex­e­cu­tion. This au­thor­ity shall also de­cide on wheth­er the ap­peal has sus­pens­ive ef­fect.

4 If the per­son con­victed is made to serve a time-barred cus­todi­al sanc­tion, he or she shall be en­titled to dam­ages and sat­is­fac­tion in ana­log­ous ap­plic­a­tion of Art­icle 431.

Art. 442 Enforcement of decisions on procedural costs and other financial payments

1 Pro­ced­ur­al costs, mon­et­ary pen­al­ties, fines and oth­er fin­an­cial pay­ments to be made in con­nec­tion with crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings shall be col­lec­ted in ac­cord­ance with the pro­vi­sions of the DEBA173.

2 Claims in re­spect of pro­ced­ur­al costs must be filed with­in 10 years of the date on which the de­cision on costs be­comes leg­ally bind­ing. De­fault in­terest amounts to 5 per cent.

3 The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall de­term­ine the au­thor­it­ies that col­lect fin­an­cial pay­ments.

4 The crim­in­al justice au­thor­it­ies may set off their claims in re­spect of pro­ced­ur­al costs against the claims to dam­ages of the party li­able to pay arising from the same crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings and against seized as­sets.

Art. 443 Enforcement of criminal judgments on civil matters

In­so­far as the judg­ment relates to civil claims, it shall be en­forced in ac­cord­ance with the civil pro­ced­ure law ap­plic­able at the place of ex­e­cu­tion and the DEBA174.

Art. 444 Official notices

The Con­fed­er­a­tion and the can­tons shall de­term­ine the au­thor­it­ies that must is­sue of­fi­cial no­tices.

Title 12 Final Provisions

Chapter 1 Implementing Provisions

Art. 445

The Fed­er­al Coun­cil and, in­so­far as they are re­spons­ible, the can­tons shall is­sue the pro­vi­sions re­quired to im­ple­ment this Code.

Chapter 2 Amendment of Legislation

Art. 446 Repeal and amendment of current legislation

1 The re­peal and the amend­ment of cur­rent le­gis­la­tion are reg­u­lated in An­nex 1.

2 The Fed­er­al As­sembly may amend by or­din­ance pro­vi­sions of fed­er­al acts that are con­tra­dict­ory to this Code but which have not been form­ally amended herein.

Art. 447 Coordination provisions

The co­ordin­a­tion of pro­vi­sions of oth­er en­act­ments with this Code is reg­u­lated in An­nex 2.

Chapter 3 Transitional Provisions

Section 1 General Procedural Provisions

Art. 448 Applicable law

1 Pro­ceed­ings that are pending when this Code comes in­to force shall be con­tin­ued in ac­cord­ance with the new law un­less the fol­low­ing pro­vi­sions provide oth­er­wise.

2 Pro­ced­ur­al acts that were ordered or car­ried out be­fore this Code came in­to force shall re­main val­id.

Art. 449 Jurisdiction

1 Pro­ceed­ings that are pending when this Code comes in­to force shall be con­tin­ued by the com­pet­ent au­thor­it­ies un­der the new law un­less the fol­low­ing pro­vi­sions provide oth­er­wise.

2 Con­flicts on jur­is­dic­tion between au­thor­it­ies of the same can­ton shall be de­cided by the ob­jec­tions au­thor­ity of the can­ton con­cerned and con­flicts between the au­thor­it­ies of dif­fer­ent can­tons or between can­ton­al and fed­er­al au­thor­it­ies shall be de­cided by the Fed­er­al Crim­in­al Court.

Section 2 Main Proceedings of First Instance and Special Proceedings

Art. 450 Main proceedings of first instance

If the main hear­ing has already be­gun when this Code comes in­to force, it shall be con­tin­ued in ac­cord­ance with the pre­vi­ous law in the pre­vi­ously com­pet­ent court of first in­stance.

Art. 451 Separate subsequent court decisions

After this Code comes in­to force, sep­ar­ate sub­sequent court de­cisions shall be made by the crim­in­al justice au­thor­ity that would have been re­spons­ible for the first in­stance judg­ment un­der this Code.

Art. 452 Proceedings in absentia

1 Ap­plic­a­tions for re-as­sess­ment fol­low­ing a judg­ment in ab­sen­tia that are pending when this Code comes in­to force shall be con­sidered in ac­cord­ance with the pre­vi­ous law.

2 Ap­plic­a­tions for re-as­sess­ment fol­low­ing a judg­ment in ab­sen­tia un­der the pre­vi­ous law that are made after this Code comes in­to force shall be con­sidered in ac­cord­ance with the law that is more fa­vour­able to the ap­plic­ant.

3 The new law ap­plies to the re-as­sess­ment. The court that would have been re­spons­ible for the judg­ment in ab­sen­tia in ac­cord­ance with this Code has jur­is­dic­tion.

Section 3 Appellate Proceedings

Art. 453 Decisions made before this Code comes into force

1 If a de­cision was made be­fore this Code comes in­to force, an ap­pel­late rem­edy against it shall be judged in ac­cord­ance with the pre­vi­ous law by the au­thor­it­ies com­pet­ent un­der the pre­vi­ous law.

2 If pro­ceed­ings are re­mit­ted by the ap­pel­late au­thor­ity or the Fed­er­al Su­preme Court for re-as­sess­ment, the new law ap­plies. The re-as­sess­ment shall be car­ried out by the au­thor­ity that would have been re­spons­ible for the quashed de­cision in ac­cord­ance with this Code.

Art. 454 Decision made after this Code comes into force

1 Ap­pel­late rem­ed­ies against first in­stance de­cisions that are made after this Code comes in­to force are gov­erned by the new law.

2 Ap­pel­late rem­ed­ies against first in­stance de­cisions of high­er courts that are made in ac­cord­ance with the pre­vi­ous law after this Code comes in­to force are gov­erned by the pre­vi­ous law.

Section 4 Rejections of Summary Penalty Orders; Private Prosecutions

Art. 455 Rejections of summary penalty orders

Re­jec­tions of sum­mary pen­alty or­ders are gov­erned by Art­icle 453 mu­tatis mutandis.

Art. 456 Private prosecutions

Private pro­sec­u­tions un­der the pre­vi­ous can­ton­al law that are pending be­fore a court of first in­stance when this Code comes in­to force shall be con­tin­ued to the con­clu­sion of first in­stance pro­ceed­ings in ac­cord­ance with the pre­vi­ous law by the court that was com­pet­ent un­der the pre­vi­ous law.

Section 5 Transitional Provision to the Amendment of 28 September 2012175

175 Inserted by No I 2 of the FA of 28 Sept. 2012 (Transcription Regulations), in force since 1 May 2013 (AS 2013 851; BBl 2012 57075719).

Art. 456a

In pro­ceed­ings that are pending when the Amend­ment of 28 Septem­ber 2012 to this Code comes in­to force, the new law ap­plies to ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings from the date on which the Amend­ment comes in­to force.

Chapter 4 Referendum and Commencement

Art. 457

1 This Code is sub­ject to an op­tion­al ref­er­en­dum.

2 The Fed­er­al Coun­cil shall de­term­ine the com­mence­ment date.

Com­mence­ment date: 1 Janu­ary 2011176

176 FCD of 31 March 2010.

Annex 1

Repeal and Amendment of Current Legislation

Annex 2

Coordination Provisions

1. Coordination of Article 305 paragraph 2 letter b of the Criminal Procedure Code with the new Victim Support Act 180

180 The new VSA came into force on 1 Jan. 2009.

2. Coordination of Number 9 of Annex 1 with the new Victim Support Act

3. Coordination of the Military Criminal Procedure Code of 23 March 1979 (Annex 1 number 12) with the new VSA182182

4. Coordination of Article 269 paragraph 2 letter a with the Federal Decree of 18 December 2015 on the Adoption and Implementation of the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance