Federal Act
on Foreign Nationals and Integration
(Foreign Nationals and Integration Act, FNIA)1

English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is provided for information purposes only and has no legal force.

of 16 December 2005 (Status as of 2 October 2021)

1 Amended by No I of the FA of 16 Dec. 2016 (Integration), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2017 6521, 2018 3171; BBl 2013 2397, 2016 2821).


Open article in different language:  FR  |  IT
Art. 74 Restriction and exclusion orders

1 The com­pet­ent can­ton­al au­thor­ity may re­quire a per­son not to leave the area they were al­loc­ated to or not to enter a spe­cif­ic area if:

a.
they do not hold a short stay, res­id­ence or set­tle­ment per­mit and they dis­rupt or rep­res­ent a threat to pub­lic se­cur­ity and or­der; this meas­ure serves in par­tic­u­lar to com­bat il­leg­al drug traf­fick­ing; or
b.166
they are sub­ject to a leg­ally bind­ing ex­pul­sion or re­mov­al or­der and spe­cif­ic in­dic­a­tions lead to the be­lief that the per­son con­cerned will not leave be­fore the de­par­ture dead­line or has failed to ob­serve the de­par­ture dead­line.
c.167
de­port­a­tion has been post­poned (Art. 69 para. 3).

1bis The com­pet­ent can­ton­al au­thor­ity shall re­quire a per­son who is ac­com­mod­ated in a spe­cial centre un­der Art­icle 24aAsylA168 not to leave the area they were al­loc­ated to or not to enter a spe­cif­ic area.169

2 These meas­ures shall be ordered by the au­thor­ity of the can­ton that is re­spons­ible for the im­ple­ment­a­tion of re­mov­al or ex­pul­sion. In the case of per­sons stay­ing in fed­er­al centres, the can­ton where the centre is loc­ated is re­spons­ible. The pro­hib­i­tion from en­ter­ing a spe­cif­ic area may also be is­sued by the au­thor­ity of the can­ton where this area is loc­ated.170

3 Ap­peals may be lodged with a can­ton­al ju­di­cial au­thor­ity against the or­der­ing of these meas­ures. The ap­peal has no sus­pens­ive ef­fect.

166 Amended by Art. 2 No 1 of the FD of 18 June 2010 on the Ad­op­tion of the EC Dir­ect­ive on the Re­turn of Il­leg­al Im­mig­rants (Dir­ect­ive 2008/115/EC), in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 5925; BBl 2009 8881).

167 In­ser­ted by Art. 2 No 1 of the FD of 18 June 2010 on the Ad­op­tion of the EC Dir­ect­ive on the Re­turn of Il­leg­al Im­mig­rants (Dir­ect­ive 2008/115/EC), in force since 1 Jan. 2011 (AS 2010 5925; BBl 2009 8881).

168 SR 142.31

169 In­ser­ted by An­nex No 1 of the FA of 25 Sept. 2015, in force since 1 March 2019 (AS 2016 3101, 2018 2855; BBl 2014 7991).

170 Amended by An­nex No 1 of the FA of 25 Sept. 2015, in force since 1 March 2019 (AS 2016 3101, 2018 2855; BBl 2014 7991).

BGE

147 IV 232 (6B_1398/2020) from 10. März 2021
Regeste: Art. 291 StGB, Art. 115 AIG, Rückführungsrichtlinie 2008/115/CE; Verweisungsbruch, Freiheitsstrafe. Der Straftatbestand des Verweisungsbruchs (Art. 291 StGB) kann nur durch ausländische Staatsangehörige begangen werden. Art. 115 Abs. 1 lit. a und b AIG ist subsidiär zu Art. 291 StGB, der die Missachtung einer Verweisung durch Einreise oder Aufenthalt hierzulande trotz entsprechenden Entscheids sanktioniert (E. 1.1). Im Lichte der EuGH-Rechtsprechung zur Rückführungsrichtlinie kann eine wegen Verweisungsbruchs im Sinne von Art. 291 StGB verurteilte Person nur dann mit einer Freiheitsstrafe belegt werden, wenn die erforderlichen Entfernungs- und Fernhaltemassnahmen ergriffen worden resp. aufgrund des Verhaltens dieser Person gescheitert sind (E. 1.2-1.4 und 1.6). Vorliegend ist die Verurteilung des Beschwerdeführers zu einer Freiheitsstrafe mangels Anordnung oder Scheiterns solcher Massnahmen nicht mit der Rückführungsrichtlinie vereinbar (E. 1.7).

Previous article Show article in the law Next article

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzrichtlinie und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Feedback
Gesetzeskürzel Name
DE FR IT EN
DE FR IT EN
Laden