Federal Act
on Foreign Nationals and Integration
(Foreign Nationals and Integration Act, FNIA)1

1 Amended by No I of the FA of 16 Dec. 2016 (Integration), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2017 6521, 2018 3171; BBl 2013 2397, 2016 2821).


Open article in different language:  DE  |  FR  |  IT
Art. 43 Spouses and children of persons with a settlement permit 63

1 The for­eign spouse and un­mar­ried chil­dren un­der 18 of a per­son with a set­tle­ment per­mit are en­titled to be gran­ted a res­id­ence per­mit and to have their res­id­ence per­mit ex­ten­ded provided:

a.
they live with that per­son;
b.
suit­able ac­com­mod­a­tion is avail­able;
c.
they do not de­pend on so­cial as­sist­ance;
d.
they are able to com­mu­nic­ate in the na­tion­al lan­guage spoken at their place of res­id­ence; and
e.
the fam­ily mem­ber they are join­ing is not claim­ing sup­ple­ment­ary be­ne­fits un­der the Fed­er­al Act of 6 Oc­to­ber 200664 on Be­ne­fits sup­ple­ment­ary to the Old Age, Sur­viv­ors’ and In­valid­ity In­sur­ance (SBA) or would not be en­titled to claim such be­ne­fits due to fam­ily re­uni­fic­a­tion.

2 In or­der to ob­tain a res­id­ence per­mit, it is suf­fi­cient to re­gister for a lan­guage sup­port pro­gramme as an al­tern­at­ive to meet­ing the re­quire­ment set out in para­graph 1 let­ter d.

3 In the case of un­mar­ried chil­dren un­der the age of 18, the re­quire­ment in para­graph 1 let­ter d does not ap­ply.

4 The grant­ing and ex­ten­sion of the res­id­ence per­mit may be linked to the con­clu­sion of an in­teg­ra­tion agree­ment if there is a spe­cial need for in­teg­ra­tion in ac­cord­ance with the cri­ter­ia set out in Art­icle 58a.

5 After a law-abid­ing and un­in­ter­rup­ted peri­od of stay of five years, spouses are en­titled to be gran­ted a set­tle­ment per­mit if the in­teg­ra­tion cri­ter­ia set out in Art­icle 58a are met.

6 Chil­dren un­der twelve are en­titled to be gran­ted a set­tle­ment per­mit.

63 Amended by No I of the FA of 16 Dec. 2016 (In­teg­ra­tion), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2017 6521, 2018 3171; BBl 2013 2397, 2016 2821).

64 SR 831.30

BGE

149 II 1 (2C_60/2022) from 27. Dezember 2022
Regeste: Art. 43 Abs. 1 lit. c und e, Art. 44 Abs. 1 lit. c und e, Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c AIG; Rechtmässigkeit des Widerrufs einer Niederlassungsbewilligung, wenn Ergänzungsleistungen zur AHV/IV bezogen werden. Bezüglich der Frage, ob Sozialhilfeabhängigkeit im Sinne von Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c AIG besteht, ist auf den Zeitpunkt des angefochtenen Urteils abzustellen. Wird in diesem Zeitpunkt keine Sozialhilfe mehr bezogen, sondern Ergänzungsleistungen, ist der Widerrufsgrund nicht mehr erfüllt (E. 4).

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzrichtlinie und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Feedback
Laden