Federal Act
on Financial Market Infrastructures and Market Conduct in Securities and Derivatives Trading
(Financial Market Infrastructure Act, FinMIA)


Open article in different language:  DE  |  FR  |  IT
Art. 154 Exploitation of insider information

1 A cus­todi­al sen­tence not ex­ceed­ing three years or a mon­et­ary pen­alty shall be im­posed on any per­son who as a body or a mem­ber of a man­aging or su­per­vis­ory body of an is­suer or of a com­pany con­trolling or con­trolled by them, or as a per­son who due to their hold­ing or activ­ity has le­git­im­ate ac­cess to in­sider in­form­a­tion, if they gain a pe­cu­ni­ary ad­vant­age for them­selves or for an­oth­er with in­sider in­form­a­tion by:

a.72
ex­ploit­ing it to ac­quire or dis­pose of se­cur­it­ies ad­mit­ted to trad­ing on a trad­ing ven­ue or DLT trad­ing fa­cil­ity which has its re­gistered of­fice in Switzer­land or to use de­riv­at­ives of such se­cur­it­ies;
b.
dis­clos­ing it to an­oth­er;
c.73
ex­ploit­ing it to re­com­mend that an­oth­er ac­quire or dis­pose of se­cur­it­ies ad­mit­ted to trad­ing on a trad­ing ven­ue or DLT trad­ing fa­cil­ity which has its re­gistered of­fice in Switzer­land or to use de­riv­at­ives of such se­cur­it­ies.

2 Any per­son who through an act set out in para­graph 1 gains a pe­cu­ni­ary ad­vant­age ex­ceed­ing one mil­lion francs shall be li­able to a cus­todi­al sen­tence not ex­ceed­ing five years or a mon­et­ary pen­alty.

3 Any per­son who gains a pe­cu­ni­ary ad­vant­age for them­selves or for an­oth­er by ex­ploit­ing in­sider in­form­a­tion or a re­com­mend­a­tion based on in­sider in­form­a­tion dis­closed or giv­en to them by a per­son re­ferred to in para­graph 1 or ac­quired through a felony or mis­de­mean­our in or­der to ac­quire or dis­pose of se­cur­it­ies ad­mit­ted to trad­ing on a trad­ing ven­ue or DLT trad­ing fa­cil­ity which has its re­gistered of­fice in Switzer­land or in or­der to use de­riv­at­ives of such se­cur­it­ies shall be li­able to a cus­todi­al sen­tence not ex­ceed­ing one year or to a mon­et­ary pen­alty.74

4 Any per­son who is not a per­son re­ferred to in para­graphs 1 to 3 and yet who gains a pe­cu­ni­ary ad­vant­age for them­selves or for an­oth­er by ex­ploit­ing in­sider in­form­a­tion or a re­com­mend­a­tion based on in­sider in­form­a­tion in or­der to ac­quire or dis­pose of se­cur­it­ies ad­mit­ted to trad­ing on a trad­ing ven­ue or DLT trad­ing fa­cil­ity which has its re­gistered of­fice in Switzer­land or to use de­riv­at­ives of such se­cur­it­ies shall be li­able to a fine.75

72 Amended by No I 10 of the FA of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ad­apt­a­tion of Fed­er­al Law to De­vel­op­ments in Dis­trib­uted Ledger Tech­no­logy, in force since 1 Aug. 2021 (AS 2021 33, 399; BBl 2020 233).

73 Amended by No I 10 of the FA of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ad­apt­a­tion of Fed­er­al Law to De­vel­op­ments in Dis­trib­uted Ledger Tech­no­logy, in force since 1 Aug. 2021 (AS 2021 33, 399; BBl 2020 233).

74 Amended by No I 10 of the FA of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ad­apt­a­tion of Fed­er­al Law to De­vel­op­ments in Dis­trib­uted Ledger Tech­no­logy, in force since 1 Aug. 2021 (AS 2021 33, 399; BBl 2020 233).

75 Amended by No I 10 of the FA of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ad­apt­a­tion of Fed­er­al Law to De­vel­op­ments in Dis­trib­uted Ledger Tech­no­logy, in force since 1 Aug. 2021 (AS 2021 33, 399; BBl 2020 233).

BGE

145 IV 407 (6B_90/2019) from 7. August 2019
Regeste: a Art. 130 lit. d, 337 StPO; persönliches Erscheinen der Staatsanwaltschaft vor Gericht, notwendige Verteidigung. Der Umstand, dass der Staatsanwalt vom erstinstanzlichen Richter zur Hauptverhandlung vorgeladen wurde, hindert ihn nicht, auf sein persönliches Erscheinen zu verzichten, wenn die Voraussetzungen für eine notwendige Verteidigung nicht erfüllt sind und er von der Verfahrensleitung nicht zur persönlichen Vertretung der Anklage verpflichtet worden ist (E. 1).

147 II 432 (1C_196/2021) from 28. Mai 2021
Regeste: Art. 2 Abs. 1 und Art. 23 AVUS; Art. 8 und 35 Abs. 1 IRSG; Art. 154 FinfraG; Auslieferung an die USA; beidseitige Strafbarkeit; Insidertatbestand; Günstigkeitsprinzip. Art. 154 Abs. 3 FinfraG ermöglicht a priori wie seine Vorgängerbestimmungen (aArt. 40 Abs. 3 BankG, aArt. 161 Abs. 2 StGB) die Bestrafung eines indirekten Insiders (E. 2). Rekapitulation der Grundlagen des Günstigkeitsprinzips (E. 3.1). Art. 23 AVUS bekräftigt dieses Prinzip für die Beziehungen zu den USA (E. 3.2). Die Anwendung des günstigeren Landesrechts (vorliegend Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG) erfordert keine Gegenseitigkeit (E. 3).

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzrichtlinie und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Feedback
Laden