Federal Act
on Private International Law
(PILA)

¹ A party may re­quest a re­view of an award if:

a.

it has sub­sequently be­come aware of sig­ni­fic­ant facts or un­covered de­cis­ive evid­ence which it could not have pro­duced in the earli­er pro­ceed­ings des­pite ex­er­cising due di­li­gence; the fore­go­ing does not ap­ply to facts or evid­ence that came in­to ex­ist­ence after the award was is­sued;

b.

crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings have es­tab­lished that the ar­bit­ral award was in­flu­enced to the det­ri­ment of the party con­cerned by a felony or mis­de­mean­our, even if no one is con­victed by a crim­in­al court; if crim­in­al pro­ceed­ings are not pos­sible, proof may be provided in some oth­er man­ner;

c.

a ground for a chal­lenge un­der Art­icle 180 para­graph 1 let­ter c only came to light after con­clu­sion of the ar­bit­ra­tion pro­ceed­ings des­pite ex­er­cising due di­li­gence and no oth­er leg­al rem­edy is avail­able.

² The re­quest for a re­view must be filed with­in 90 days of the grounds for re­view com­ing to light. A re­view may not be re­ques­ted more than ten years after the award be­comes leg­ally bind­ing, ex­cept in the case of para­graph 1 let­ter b.