Federal Act
on Private International Law
(PILA)


Open article in different language:  DE  |  FR  |  IT
Art. 5

IV. Choice of for­um

 

1In mat­ters in­volving an eco­nom­ic in­terest, the parties may agree on the court that will have to de­cide any ex­ist­ing or fu­ture dis­pute arising from a spe­cif­ic leg­al re­la­tion­ship. The agree­ment may be done in writ­ing, or by any oth­er means al­low­ing it to be evid­enced by text.5 Un­less oth­er­wise agreed, the choice of for­um is ex­clus­ive.

1bis If the parties have merely agreed that the place of jur­is­dic­tion is in Switzer­land, the jur­is­dic­tion of the Swiss courts shall be de­term­ined in ac­cord­ance with the pro­vi­sions of this Act. If there is no such pro­vi­sion, the court first seised shall have jur­is­dic­tion.6

2The choice of for­um has no ef­fect if it res­ults in ab­us­ively de­priving a party from the pro­tec­tion gran­ted to it by a for­um provided by Swiss law.

3 ...7

5 Sen­tence amended by An­nex No 1 of the FedD of 22 Dec. 2023 on the Ad­op­tion and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Hag­ue Con­ven­tion on Choice of Court Agree­ments, in force since 1 Jan. 2025 (AS 2024 561; BBl 2023 1460).

6 In­ser­ted by An­nex No 1 of the FedD of 22 Dec. 2023 on the Ad­op­tion and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Hag­ue Con­ven­tion on Choice of Court Agree­ments, in force since 1 Jan. 2025 (AS 2024 561; BBl 2023 1460).

7 Re­pealed by An­nex No 2 of the FedD of 22 Dec. 2023 on the Ad­op­tion and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Hag­ue Con­ven­tion on Choice of Court Agree­ments, with ef­fect from 1 Jan. 2025 (AS 2024 561; BBl 2023 1460).

 

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzrichtlinie und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Feedback
Laden