Drucken
Artikel, Notizen und Markierungen werden geladen... Bitte um etwas Geduld.

Federal Act
on the Amendment of the Swiss Civil Code
(Part Five: The Code of Obligations)

English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is provided for information purposes only and has no legal force.

of 30 March 1911 (Status as of 1 January 2022)

Art. 271a

II. No­tice served by the land­lord

 

1 No­tice of ter­min­a­tion served by the land­lord may be chal­lenged in par­tic­u­lar where it is giv­en:

a.
be­cause the ten­ant is as­sert­ing claims arising un­der the lease in good faith;
b.
be­cause the land­lord wishes to im­pose a uni­lat­er­al amend­ment of the lease to the ten­ant’s det­ri­ment or to change the rent;
c.
for the sole pur­pose of in­du­cing the ten­ant to pur­chase the leased premises;
d.
dur­ing con­cili­ation or court pro­ceed­ings in con­nec­tion with the lease, un­less the ten­ant ini­ti­ated such pro­ceed­ings in bad faith;
e.
with­in three years of the con­clu­sion of con­cili­ation or court pro­ceed­ings in con­nec­tion with the lease in which the land­lord:
1.
was largely un­suc­cess­ful,
2.
with­drew or con­sid­er­ably re­duced his claim or ac­tion,
3.
de­clined to bring the mat­ter be­fore the court,
4.
reached a set­tle­ment or some oth­er com­prom­ise with the ten­ant;
f.
be­cause of changes in the ten­ant’s fam­ily cir­cum­stances which do not give rise to any sig­ni­fic­ant dis­ad­vant­age to the land­lord.

2Para­graph 1 let. e. is also ap­plic­able where the ten­ant can pro­duce doc­u­ments show­ing that he reached a set­tle­ment with the land­lord con­cern­ing a claim in con­nec­tion with the lease out­side con­cili­ation or court pro­ceed­ings.

3 Para­graph 1 let. d. and e. are not ap­plic­able where no­tice of ter­min­a­tion is giv­en:

a.
be­cause the land­lord ur­gently needs the prop­erty for his own use or that of fam­ily mem­bers or in-laws;
b.
be­cause the ten­ant is in de­fault on his pay­ments (Art. 257d);
c.
be­cause the ten­ant is in ser­i­ous breach of his duty of care and con­sid­er­a­tion (Art. 257f para. 3 and 4);
d.
as a res­ult of ali­en­a­tion of the leased premises (Art. 261);
e.
for good cause (Art. 266g);
f.
be­cause the ten­ant is bank­rupt (Art. 266h).