|
Art. 25a Criminal provision
1 Any person who, for his own benefit or for the benefit of a third party, offers, promises or grants an undue advantage to a person who exercises a function at a sports competition at which sports betting is offered in order to falsify the outcome of that sports competition (indirect competition rigging) shall be liable to a custodial sentence not exceeding three years or to a monetary penalty. 2 Any person who exercises a function at a sports competition at which sports betting is offered and who requests, secures the promise of or accepts, for his own benefit or for the benefit of a third party, an undue advantage in order to falsify the outcome of that sports competition (direct competition rigging) shall be liable to a custodial sentence not exceeding three years or to a monetary penalty. 3 In serious cases, the penalty shall be a custodial sentence not exceeding five years or a monetary penalty. A serious case arises in particular where the offender:16
16 Amended by No I 15 of the FA of 17 Dec. 2021 on the Harmonisation of Sentencing Policy, in force since 1 July 2023 (AS 2023 259; BBl 2018 2827). BGE
145 IV 329 (6B_49/2019) from 2. August 2019
Regeste: Art. 22 SpoFöG, Art. 1 StGB; Doping, Legalitätsprinzip. Der Begriff "Dopingzweck" wird vom Gesetzgeber und allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch hinreichend bestimmt und die Strafnorm in Art. 22 SpoFöG verletzt das Legalitätsprinzip nicht (E. 2.3.2). Art. 22 SpoFöG ist auch ausserhalb von Wettkämpfen anwendbar (E. 2.4.2). |