Swiss Criminal Code

of 21 December 1937 (Status as of 1 June 2022)


Open article in different language:  DE  |  FR  |  IT
Art. 305bis349

Money laun­der­ing

 

1. Any per­son who car­ries out an act that is aimed at frus­trat­ing the iden­ti­fic­a­tion of the ori­gin, the tra­cing or the for­feit­ure of as­sets which he knows or must as­sume ori­gin­ate from a felony or ag­grav­ated tax mis­de­mean­our shall be li­able to a cus­todi­al sen­tence not ex­ceed­ing three years or to a mon­et­ary pen­alty.350

1bis. An ag­grav­ated tax mis­de­mean­our is any of the of­fences set out in Art­icle 186 of the Fed­er­al Act of 14 Decem­ber 1990351 on Dir­ect Fed­er­al Tax­a­tion and Art­icle 59 para­graph 1 clause one of the Fed­er­al Act of 14 Decem­ber 1990352 on the Har­mon­isa­tion of Dir­ect Fed­er­al Tax­a­tion at Can­ton­al and Com­mun­al Levels, if the tax evaded in any tax peri­od ex­ceeds 300 000 francs.353

2. In ser­i­ous cases, the pen­alty is a cus­todi­al sen­tence not ex­ceed­ing five years or a mon­et­ary pen­alty. A cus­todi­al sen­tence is com­bined with a mon­et­ary pen­alty not ex­ceed­ing 500 daily pen­alty units.354

A ser­i­ous case is con­sti­tuted, in par­tic­u­lar, where the of­fend­er:

a.355
acts as a mem­ber of a crim­in­al or ter­ror­ist or­gan­isa­tion;
b.
acts as a mem­ber of a group that has been formed for the pur­pose of the con­tin­ued con­duct of money laun­der­ing activ­it­ies; or
c.
achieves a large turnover or sub­stan­tial profit through com­mer­cial money laun­der­ing.

3. The of­fend­er is also li­able to the fore­go­ing pen­al­ties where the main of­fence was com­mit­ted abroad, provided such an of­fence is also li­able to pro­sec­u­tion at the place of com­mis­sion.356

349In­ser­ted by No I of the FA of 23 March 1990, in force since 1 Aug. 1990 (AS 1990 10771078; BBl 1989 II 1061).

350 Amended by No I 4 of the FA of 12 Dec. 2014 on the Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the 2012 Re­vi­sion of the Re­com­mend­a­tions of the Fin­an­cial Ac­tion Task Force, in force since 1 Jan. 2016 (AS 20151389; BBl 2014605).

351 SR 642.11

352 SR 642.14

353 In­ser­ted by No I 4 of the FA of 12 Dec. 2014 on the Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the 2012 Re­vi­sion of the Re­com­mend­a­tions of the Fin­an­cial Ac­tion Task Force, in force since 1 Jan. 2016 (AS 20151389; BBl 2014605). See also the trans­ition­al pro­vi­sion to this amend­ment at the end of the text.

354 Pen­al­ties re­vised by No II 1 para. 16 of the FA of 13 Dec. 2002, in force since 1 Jan. 2007 (AS 2006 34593535; BBl 1999 1979).

355 Amended by An­nex No II 2 of the FedD of 25 Sept. 2020 on the Ap­prov­al and Im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Coun­cil of Europe Con­ven­tion on the Pre­ven­tion of Ter­ror­ism and its Ad­di­tion­al Pro­tocol and the Strength­en­ing of Crim­in­al Justice In­stru­ments for com­bat­ing Ter­ror­ism and Or­gan­ised Crime, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2021 (AS 2021 360; BBl 2018 6427).

356Cor­rec­ted by the Draft­ing Com­mit­tee of the Fed­er­al As­sembly (Art. 33 Par­lPA; AS19741051).

BGE

123 IV 70 () from 7. März 1997
Regeste: Art. 305 StGB; Begünstigung. Ein Tierpräparator, der ihm zum Ausstopfen übergebene geschützte Tiere entgegen der jagdgesetzlichen Vorschrift nicht anzeigt, macht sich nicht der Begünstigung durch Unterlassen schuldig, weil er keine Garantenstellung innehat (E. 2). Art. 59 Ziff. 2 StGB; Ersatzforderung. Bestimmung des Betrags der Ersatzforderung zulasten des Tierpräparators (E. 3).

 

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzrichtlinie und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Feedback
Laden