Swiss Criminal Code


Open article in different language:  DE  |  FR  |  IT
Art. 55a46

3. Sus­pen­sion and aban­don­ment of pro­ceed­ings.

Spouse, re­gistered part­ner or life part­ner as vic­tim

 

1In a case of com­mon as­sault (Art. 123 no 2 para. 3–5), re­peated acts of ag­gres­sion (Art. 126 para. 2 let. b, bbis and c), threat­en­ing be­ha­viour (Art. 180 para. 2) and co­er­cion (Art. 181), the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court may sus­pend the pro­ceed­ings if:47

a.48
the vic­tim:
1.
is the spouse of the of­fend­er and the of­fence was com­mit­ted dur­ing the mar­riage or with­in a year of di­vorce, or
2.
is the re­gistered part­ner of the of­fend­er and the of­fence was com­mit­ted dur­ing the re­gistered part­ner­ship or with­in a year of its dis­sol­u­tion, or
3.
is the hetero- or ho­mo­sexu­al part­ner of the of­fend­er or the ex-part­ner of the of­fend­er if they have been sep­ar­ated for less than a year; and
b.49
the vic­tim or, if he or she lacks leg­al ca­pa­city, his or her leg­al rep­res­ent­at­ive re­quests this to be done; and
c.50
sus­pen­sion ap­pears ap­pro­pri­ate in or­der to sta­bil­ise or im­prove the vic­tim’s situ­ation.

2 The pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court may dur­ing the peri­od of sus­pen­sion re­quire the ac­cused to at­tend a course on vi­ol­ence pre­ven­tion. The pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court shall no­ti­fy the au­thor­ity or or­gan­isa­tion com­pet­ent un­der can­ton­al law for mat­ters re­lat­ing to do­mest­ic vi­ol­ence about the meas­ures taken.51

3 Sus­pen­sion is not per­mit­ted if:

a.
the ac­cused has been con­victed of a felony or mis­de­mean­our against life and limb, against liberty, or against sexu­al in­teg­rity;
b.
he or she has re­ceived a sen­tence or been made sub­ject to a meas­ure; and
c.
the vic­tim of the of­fence is a per­son lis­ted in para­graph 1 let­ter a.52

4 Sus­pen­sion is lim­ited to six months. The pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court shall re­sume the pro­ceed­ings if the vic­tim or, if he or she lacks leg­al ca­pa­city, his or her leg­al rep­res­ent­at­ive re­quests this to be done or it tran­spires that the sus­pen­sion has neither sta­bil­ised nor im­proved the vic­tim’s situ­ation.53

5 Be­fore the sus­pen­sion ends, the pub­lic pro­sec­utor or the court shall con­duct an as­sess­ment. If the vic­tim’s situ­ation has sta­bil­ised or im­proved, it shall or­der the aban­don­ment of the pro­ceed­ings.54

46 In­ser­ted by No I of the FA of 3 Oct. 2003 (Pro­sec­u­tion of Of­fences with­in Mar­riage or Re­gistered Part­ner­ships), in force since 1 April 2004 (AS 2004 14031407; BBl 2003 19091937).

47 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Im­proved Pro­tec­tion for Vic­tims of Vi­ol­ence, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307).

48 Amended by Art. 37 No 1 of the Same-Sex Part­ner­ship Act of 18 June 2004, in force since 1 Jan. 2007 (AS 20055685; BBl 2003 1288).

49 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Im­proved Pro­tec­tion for Vic­tims of Vi­ol­ence, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307).

50 In­ser­ted by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Im­proved Pro­tec­tion for Vic­tims of Vi­ol­ence, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307).

51 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Im­proved Pro­tec­tion for Vic­tims of Vi­ol­ence, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307).

52 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Im­proved Pro­tec­tion for Vic­tims of Vi­ol­ence, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307).

53 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Im­proved Pro­tec­tion for Vic­tims of Vi­ol­ence, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307).

54 In­ser­ted by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Im­proved Pro­tec­tion for Vic­tims of Vi­ol­ence, in force since 1 Ju­ly 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307).

BGE

149 IV 105 (6B_1083/2021, 6B_1084/2021) from 16. Dezember 2022
Regeste: Art. 32 und Art. 33 Abs. 1 und 3 StGB; Art. 392 StPO; Rückzug des Strafantrags; Folgen des Prinzips der Unteilbarkeit des Strafantrags. Wenn in einem Strafverfahren, das wegen einer nur auf Antrag hin zu verfolgenden Straftat eröffnet wurde, rechtskräftige Strafbefehle gegen gewisse an der Straftat beteiligte Personen erlassen worden sind, hat ein Rückzug des Strafantrags keine Folgen auf diese. Das Prinzip der Unteilbarkeit des Strafantrags verlangt nicht, die Einstellung des Verfahrens auf bereits rechtskräftig verurteilte Mitbeschuldigte auszudehnen (keine extensive Anwendung von Art. 392 StPO) (E. 3).

 

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzrichtlinie und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Feedback
Laden