|
Art. 55a46
3. Suspension and abandonment of proceedings. Spouse, registered partner or life partner as victim 1In a case of common assault (Art. 123 no 2 para. 3–5), repeated acts of aggression (Art. 126 para. 2 let. b, bbis and c), threatening behaviour (Art. 180 para. 2) and coercion (Art. 181), the public prosecutor or the court may suspend the proceedings if:47
2 The public prosecutor or the court may during the period of suspension require the accused to attend a course on violence prevention. The public prosecutor or the court shall notify the authority or organisation competent under cantonal law for matters relating to domestic violence about the measures taken.51 3 Suspension is not permitted if:
4 Suspension is limited to six months. The public prosecutor or the court shall resume the proceedings if the victim or, if he or she lacks legal capacity, his or her legal representative requests this to be done or it transpires that the suspension has neither stabilised nor improved the victim’s situation.53 5 Before the suspension ends, the public prosecutor or the court shall conduct an assessment. If the victim’s situation has stabilised or improved, it shall order the abandonment of the proceedings.54 46 Inserted by No I of the FA of 3 Oct. 2003 (Prosecution of Offences within Marriage or Registered Partnerships), in force since 1 April 2004 (AS 2004 14031407; BBl 2003 19091937). 47 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Improved Protection for Victims of Violence, in force since 1 July 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307). 48 Amended by Art. 37 No 1 of the Same-Sex Partnership Act of 18 June 2004, in force since 1 Jan. 2007 (AS 20055685; BBl 2003 1288). 49 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Improved Protection for Victims of Violence, in force since 1 July 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307). 50 Inserted by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Improved Protection for Victims of Violence, in force since 1 July 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307). 51 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Improved Protection for Victims of Violence, in force since 1 July 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307). 52 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Improved Protection for Victims of Violence, in force since 1 July 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307). 53 Amended by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Improved Protection for Victims of Violence, in force since 1 July 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307). 54 Inserted by No I 3 of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 on Improved Protection for Victims of Violence, in force since 1 July 2020 (AS 2019 2273; BBl 2017 7307). BGE
149 IV 105 (6B_1083/2021, 6B_1084/2021) from 16. Dezember 2022
Regeste: Art. 32 und Art. 33 Abs. 1 und 3 StGB; Art. 392 StPO; Rückzug des Strafantrags; Folgen des Prinzips der Unteilbarkeit des Strafantrags. Wenn in einem Strafverfahren, das wegen einer nur auf Antrag hin zu verfolgenden Straftat eröffnet wurde, rechtskräftige Strafbefehle gegen gewisse an der Straftat beteiligte Personen erlassen worden sind, hat ein Rückzug des Strafantrags keine Folgen auf diese. Das Prinzip der Unteilbarkeit des Strafantrags verlangt nicht, die Einstellung des Verfahrens auf bereits rechtskräftig verurteilte Mitbeschuldigte auszudehnen (keine extensive Anwendung von Art. 392 StPO) (E. 3). |