Swiss Criminal Code


Open article in different language:  DE  |  FR  |  IT
Art. 67c109

c. Com­mon pro­vi­sions

En­force­ment of pro­hib­i­tion or­ders

 

1 A pro­hib­i­tion or­der comes in­to ef­fect on the day on which the judg­ment takes full leg­al ef­fect.

2 The dur­a­tion of a cus­todi­al sen­tence or of a cus­todi­al meas­ure (Art. 59–61 and 64) is not taken in­to ac­count in de­term­in­ing the term of the pro­hib­i­tion or­der.

3 If the of­fend­er fails to com­plete the pro­ba­tion­ary peri­od suc­cess­fully and if the sus­pen­ded cus­todi­al sen­tence is ex­ecuted or a re­call to cus­tody is ordered in re­spect of a sen­tence or meas­ure, the term of the pro­hib­i­tion or­der is cal­cu­lated from the day on which the of­fend­er is re­leased on pa­role or gran­ted fi­nal re­lease or on which the sanc­tion is re­voked or re­mit­ted.

4 If the of­fend­er com­pletes the pro­ba­tion­ary peri­od suc­cess­fully, the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity shall de­cide on any modi­fic­a­tion of the con­di­tions or term of the pro­hib­i­tion or­der un­der Art­icle 67 para­graph 1 or Art­icle 67b, or on wheth­er the pro­hib­i­tion or­der should be re­voked.

5 The of­fend­er may ap­ply to the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity for a modi­fic­a­tion of the con­di­tions or term of the pro­hib­i­tion or­der, or to have the pro­hib­i­tion or­der re­voked:

a.
in the case of a pro­hib­i­tion or­der un­der Art­icle 67 para­graph 1 or un­der Art­icle 67b: after the or­der has been in force for two years;
b.
in the case of a lim­ited pro­hib­i­tion or­der un­der Art­icle 67 para­graph 2: after half of the term of the pro­hib­i­tion or­der, provided the or­der has been in force for at least three years;
c.110
...
d.111
in the case of a lifelong pro­hib­i­tion or­der un­der Art­icle 67 para­graph 2bis: after the or­der has been in force for ten years.

6 If it is con­sidered un­likely that the of­fend­er will com­mit any fur­ther felon­ies or mis­de­mean­ours by mis­us­ing an activ­ity or by hav­ing con­tact with spe­cif­ic per­sons of a spe­cif­ic group to and the of­fend­er has provided reas­on­able com­pens­a­tion for the loss, dam­age or in­jury caused, the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity shall re­voke the pro­hib­i­tion or­der in cases fall­ing un­der para­graph 4 or 5.

6bis Pro­hib­i­tion or­ders un­der Art­icle 67 para­graphs 3 or 4 may not re­voked.112

7 If the of­fend­er breaches an activ­ity pro­hib­i­tion or­der or a con­tact pro­hib­i­tion and ex­clu­sion or­der or if he fails to com­ply with the as­so­ci­ated pro­ba­tion as­sist­ance, or if such as­sist­ance can­not be provided or is no longer re­quired, the com­pet­ent au­thor­ity shall sub­mit a re­port to the court or the ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity. The court or the ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity may re­voke or make a new or­der for pro­ba­tion as­sist­ance.

7bis The ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity may or­der pro­ba­tion as­sist­ance for the en­tire dur­a­tion of the pro­hib­i­tion from car­ry­ing on an activ­ity or the con­tact and ex­clu­sion or­der.113

8 If the of­fend­er fails to com­ply with the pro­ba­tion as­sist­ance dur­ing a pro­ba­tion­ary peri­od, Art­icle 95 para­graphs 4 and 5 ap­ply.

9 If the of­fend­er breaches an activ­ity pro­hib­i­tion or­der or a con­tact pro­hib­i­tion and ex­clu­sion or­der dur­ing a pro­ba­tion­ary peri­od, Art­icle 294 and the pro­vi­sions on re­vok­ing a sus­pen­ded sen­tence or the sus­pen­ded part of a sen­tence and on a re­call to cus­tody in re­spect of a sen­tence or meas­ure ap­ply.

109 In­ser­ted by No I 1 of the FA of 13 Dec. 2013 on Activ­ity Pro­hib­i­tion Or­ders and Con­tact Pro­hib­i­tion and Ex­clu­sion Or­ders, in force since 1 Jan. 2015 (AS 2014 2055; BBl 2012 8819).

110 Re­pealed by No I 1 of the FA of 16 March 2018 (Im­ple­ment­a­tion of Art. 123c Cst.), with ef­fect from 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 3803; BBl 2016 6115).

111 Amended by No I 1 of the FA of 16 March 2018 (Im­ple­ment­a­tion of Art. 123c Cst.), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 3803; BBl 2016 6115).

112 In­ser­ted by No I 1 of the FA of 16 March 2018 (Im­ple­ment­a­tion of Art. 123c Cst.), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 3803; BBl 2016 6115).

113 In­ser­ted by No I 1 of the FA of 16 March 2018 (Im­ple­ment­a­tion of Art. 123c Cst.), in force since 1 Jan. 2019 (AS 2018 3803; BBl 2016 6115).

BGE

149 IV 161 (6B_156/2023) from 3. April 2023
Regeste: Art. 67 Abs. 3 lit. d Ziff. 2 i.V.m. Art. 67 Abs. 4bis StGB; Ausnahme vom lebenslänglichen Tätigkeitsverbot. Darstellung, unter welchen kumulativen Voraussetzungen ausnahmsweise von der Anordnung eines Tätigkeitsverbots gemäss Art. 67 Abs. 3 und 4 StGB abgesehen werden kann, und in welchen Konstellationen eine Ausnahme von Gesetzes wegen ausgeschlossen ist (E. 2.5.1-2.5.6). Sind die beiden Voraussetzungen von Art. 67 Abs. 4bis StGB erfüllt, hat das Gericht von einem Tätigkeitsverbot abzusehen, sofern kein Fall von Art. 67 Abs. 4bis lit. a und b StGB vorliegt (E. 2.5.7). Voraussetzungen für ein Absehen von der Anordnung eines Tätigkeitsverbots im konkreten Fall verneint (E. 2.6).

 

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzrichtlinie und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Feedback