|
Art. 89
d. Breach of probation 1 If a person released on parole commits a felony or misdemeanour during the probationary period, the court judging the new offence shall order his recall to custody. 2 If, despite the commission of a felony or misdemeanour during the probationary period, it is not expected that the offender will commit further offences, the court shall dispense with a recall to custody. It may admonish the offender and extend the probationary period by no more than half of the period originally fixed by the competent authority. If the extension is ordered after the expiry of the original probationary period, it begins on the day on which it is ordered. The provisions on probation assistance and conduct orders apply (Art. 93–95). 3 If a person released on parole fails to comply with the conditions of probation assistance or disregards the conduct orders, Article 95 paragraphs 3–5 applies. 4 A recall to custody may not be ordered if three years have elapsed since the expiry of the probationary period. 5 Any period of time spent on remand that the offender has served during the recall to custody proceedings is taken into account in the remainder of his sentence. 6 If the requirements for an unsuspended custodial sentence are fulfilled due to the new offence and if this coincides with the remainder of the sentence that must be executed by the recall to custody, the court shall impose a cumulative sentence in application of Article 49 a. The rules on parole again apply to this sentence. If only the remainder of the sentence is executed, Article 86 paragraphs 1–4 applies. 7 If the remainder of a sentence that must be executed in accordance with a decision on recall to custody coincides with the execution of a measure under Articles 59–61, Article 57 paragraphs 2 and 3 applies. BGE
147 IV 329 (1B_370/2020) from 10. Mai 2021
Regeste: Art. 19 Abs. 2 lit. b und Art. 334 Abs. 1 StPO; Urteilskompetenz des Einzelgerichts. Die Grenze von zwei Jahren Freiheitsentzug, bis zu der die Urteilskompetenz des Einzelgerichts vorgesehen werden kann, ist streng zu handhaben. Sie darf unter keinen Umständen überschritten werden. Dem Widerruf einer bedingten Entlassung aus dem Strafvollzug ist insoweit ebenso Rechnung zu tragen wie dem Widerruf einer bedingten Sanktion. Im zu beurteilenden Fall Aufhebung des Urteils des Einzelgerichts, das aufgrund der neu ausgesprochenen Strafe und einer zufolge Aufhebung einer ambulanten Massnahme vollziehbar erklärten Vorstrafe einen Freiheitsentzug von insgesamt 46 Monaten verantwortete (E. 2). |