Swiss Criminal Procedure Code
(Criminal Procedure Code, CrimPC)

English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is provided for information purposes only and has no legal force.

of 5 October 2007 (Status as of 1 July 2021)


Open article in different language:  DE  |  FR  |  IT
Art. 154 Special measures to protect child victims

1 A vic­tim is a child with­in the mean­ing of this Art­icle if he or she is un­der 18 years of age at the time of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing or con­front­a­tion hear­ing.

2 The first ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing with the child must take place as quickly as pos­sible.

3 The au­thor­ity may ex­clude the con­fid­ant from the pro­ceed­ings if this per­son could ex­ert a de­cis­ive in­flu­ence on the child.

4 If it is evid­ent that the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing or the con­front­a­tion hear­ing could be a ser­i­ous psy­cho­lo­gic­al bur­den for the child, the fol­low­ing rules ap­ply:

a.
A con­front­a­tion hear­ing with the ac­cused may be ordered only if the child ex­pressly re­quests the con­front­a­tion hear­ing or the ac­cused's right to be heard can­not be guar­an­teed in any oth­er way.
b.
The child may not nor­mally be in­ter­viewed more than twice dur­ing the en­tire pro­ceed­ings.
c.
A second in­ter­view shall take place only if parties were un­able to ex­er­cise their rights at the first in­ter­view or the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing is es­sen­tial in the in­terests of the en­quir­ies or of the child. If pos­sible, the child should be ques­tioned by the same per­son who con­duc­ted the first in­ter­view.
d.
Ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ings shall be con­duc­ted in the pres­ence of a spe­cial­ist by an in­vest­ig­at­ing of­ficer spe­cific­ally trained for this pur­pose. Un­less a con­front­a­tion hear­ing is held, au­dio and video re­cord­ings shall be made of the ex­am­in­a­tion hear­ing.
e.
The parties shall ex­er­cise their rights through the per­son ask­ing the ques­tions.
f.
The per­son ask­ing the ques­tions and the spe­cial­ist shall re­cord their spe­cial ob­ser­va­tions in a re­port.

BGE

106 IA 404 () from 23. April 1980
Regeste: Untersuchungshaft; provisorische Haftentlassung. Art. 27 GE-KV, Art. 5 Ziff. 3 EMRK. Die Schwere des zu beurteilenden Deliktes allein vermag eine Haftverlängerung nach Abschluss der gegen den Beschuldigten geführten Untersuchung nicht zu rechtfertigen. Hinzutreten muss ein besonderer Haftgrund, wie namentlich die Gefahr der Wiederholung, der Kollusion oder der Flucht.

108 IA 64 () from 3. März 1982
Regeste: Haftverlängerung; persönliche Freiheit. 1. Die Anwendung kantonalen Verfassungsrechts überprüft das Bundesgericht grundsätzlich frei (E. 2b). 2. Die Voraussetzungen der Haftverlängerung sind dieselben, ob die Verlängerung im Untersuchungsverfahren oder für den Zeitraum zwischen Urteilsfällung und Eintritt der Rechtskraft durch das urteilende Gericht angeordnet wird (E. 3).

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzrichtlinie und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Feedback
Laden