Federal Act
on the Intelligence Service
(Intelligence Service Act, IntelSA)

English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is provided for information purposes only and has no legal force.

of 25 September 2015 (Status as of 1 July 2021)


Open article in different language:  DE  |  FR  |  IT
Art. 64 Examination by the FDPIC

1 The FD­PIC shall con­duct an ex­am­in­a­tion in ac­cord­ance with Art­icle 63 para­graph 3 if so re­ques­ted by the ap­plic­ant.

2 It shall no­ti­fy the ap­plic­ant either that no data re­lat­ing to the ap­plic­ant has been un­law­fully pro­cessed or that it has iden­ti­fied er­rors re­lat­ing to the de­fer­ral of the pro­vi­sion of in­form­a­tion and has made a re­com­mend­a­tion as defined in Art­icle 27 FADP28 to the FIS in re­spect of their rec­ti­fic­a­tion.

3 It shall no­ti­fy the ap­plic­ant that he or she may re­quest the Fed­er­al Ad­min­is­trat­ive Court to re­view this no­ti­fic­a­tion or the im­ple­ment­a­tion of the re­com­mend­a­tion.

4 Art­icle 27 para­graphs 4–6 FADP ap­plies by ana­logy to the re­com­mend­a­tion in ac­cord­ance with para­graph 2.

5 If the ap­plic­ant cred­ibly shows that a de­fer­ral of the pro­vi­sion of in­form­a­tion will cause him or her con­sid­er­able harm that can­not be rec­ti­fied, the FD­PIC may re­com­mend that the FIS is­sue in­form­a­tion im­me­di­ately by way of ex­cep­tion provided this will not pose a risk to in­tern­al or ex­tern­al se­cur­ity.

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzrichtlinie und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Feedback
Laden